1,430 result(s)
-
951.
Washington State Ferries, MEC Decision 465 (2006) - 01/11/2006
MARINE EMPLOYEES COMMISSION - Marine Employees CommissionThe IBU charges Washington State Ferries with unfair labor practices within the meaning of RCW 47.64.130(1) by interfering with, restraining or coercing employees in the exercise of rights; encouraging or discouraging membership in an employee organization by discrimination in regard to: hiring, tenure, any term or [...] 4. WSF did not encourage or discourage membership in an employee organization by discrimination in regard to hiring, tenure, or any term or condition of employment.
-
952.
Mason County, Decision 7048 (PECB, 2000) - 05/09/2000
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeNo public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining, or in [...] (3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge;
-
953.
Cowlitz County, Decision 6204 (PECB, 1998) - 02/26/1998
DECISIONS - ElectionWhere there has been no showing of discrimination by the incumbent representative against the unit sought to be severed, nor a separate community of interest clearly demonstrated, existing bargaining relationships will not be disrupted by the Commission. [...] 8. The petitioned-for employees have not been discriminated against by their incumbent bargaining representative.
-
954.
City of Pasco, Decision 504 (PECB, 1978) - 10/05/1978
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicea. Discouraging membership in International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 280, or any other labor organization, by discharging or refusing to reinstate any of its employees, or by threatening employees with any other reprisals, or in any other manner discriminating in regard to hire or tenure of employment, [...] No public employer or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining, or in the
-
955.
Seattle School District (IUOE Local 610), Decision 9135 (PECB, 2005) - 10/17/2005
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice• discriminated in the application of the collective bargaining agreement. [...] In their closing briefs, both Zappler and the union included arguments regarding discrimination and reprisal for filing charges. [...] For complaints solely against unions by employees, the options are: (1) union interference with employee rights; (2) union discrimination for filing charges; and (3) other unfair labor practice (the complainant is asked to explain and specify on an attached sheet of paper).
-
956.
Town of Granite Falls, Decision 2692 (PECB, 1987) - 05/27/1987
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeRCW 41.56.040 RIGHT OF EMPLOYEES TO ORGANIZE AND DESIGNATE REPRESENTATIVES WITHOUT INTERFERENCE. No public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and [...] If the recall decision was affected by discrimination for Mirabella's having engaged in protected union activities, it is violative of the statute. [...] It is an unfair labor practice for an employer to refuse to hire an employee because of discrimination against that applicant's union activity or that of others with whom the applicant is aligned.
-
957.
Brewster School District (Brewster Education Association), Decision 2779 (EDUC, 1987) - 09/30/1987
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(c) To encourage or discourage membership in any employee organization by discrimination in regard to hire, tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment, but nothing contained in this subsection shall prevent an employer from requiring, as a condition of continued employment, payment of periodic dues and fees [...] (b) To cause or attempt to cause an employer to discriminate against an employee in violation of subsection (1)(c) of this section? ...
-
958.
City of Renton (WSCCCE), Decision 1825 (PECB, 1984) - 02/03/1984
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThis duty is qualified by a general standard requiring good faith and non-discrimination. [...] Other shop stewards routinely work in areas with telephones and they have not felt isolated or discriminated against.
-
959.
City of Seattle, Decision 12060-A (PECB, 2014) - 12/16/2014
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployers have interests in the uniform application of rules of conduct, the uniform application of discipline, and preventing workplace discrimination. [...] For example, there is no question employers have a legitimate managerial interest in preventing workplace discrimination or harassment.
-
960.
Everett Community College, Decision 11135-C (CCOL, 2013) - 04/09/2013
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complaint alleged employer discrimination and refusal to bargain. [...] An Examiner conducted a hearing and issued a decision finding that the employer did not discriminate and did not unilaterally change wages, hours, and working conditions.[1] The Examiner found that the employer unlawfully skimmed bargaining unit work without providing an opportunity for bargaining.
-
961.
City of Mountlake Terrace, Decision 11605 (PECB, 2012) - 12/20/2012
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge; [...] Arbitrators have no particular expertise in other issues, and the Commission does not defer any “representation,” “unit determination,” “interference,” “domination,” or “discrimination” allegations, or other types of “refusal to bargain” charges.
-
962.
City of Vancouver (Vancouver Police Officers' Guild), Decision 6933 (PECB, 2000) - 01/14/2000
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeUnion interference with employee rights and breach of its duty of fair representation, in violation of RCW 41.56.150(1), and union seeking to induce the employer to commit unfair labor practices, in violation of RCW 41.56.150(2), by harassment of and discrimination against bargaining unit employee Navin Sharma, and by [...] [4] In Steele, black employees sued to invalidate a seniority system which discriminated on the basis of race.
-
963.
Washington State Ferries (Marine Engineers Beneficial Association), MEC Decision 112 (1994) - 04/11/1994
MARINE EMPLOYEES COMMISSION - Marine Employees Commission13. On October 18, 1993, Ken Irish filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the MEC, in which he alleged that the Washington State Ferries had interfered with, restrained or coerced employees in the exercise of rights, and encouraged or discouraged membership in employee organization by discrimination in regard to: [...] He further alleged that PCD No. 1/MEBA had restrained or coerced employees in the exercise of rights guaranteed by Chapter 47.64 RCW and caused or attempted to cause an employer to discriminate against an employee in violation of RCW 47.64.130.
-
964.
Grant County, Decision 2233-A (PECB, 1986) - 10/10/1986
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeClearly, there are also parallel situations in Washington law, including administration of unemployment compensation laws by the Department of Employment Security, administration of Chapter 49.60 RCW (the law on discrimination) by the Human Rights Commission, administration of workmens' compensation laws by the Department [...] The employees of the courts were also covered by state laws on workmen's compensation, unemployment compensation and discrimination in employment, where administrative agencies might be called upon to decide issues touching upon the employment relationship of court employees.
-
965.
Shelton School District, Decision 2084 (PECB, 1984) - 11/07/1984
DECISIONS - ElectionAllegations of wage discrimination carry with it a presumption that the district must have supported such a discrimination.
-
966.
Warden School District, Decision 1235-H (EDUC, 1980) - 03/21/1980
DECISIONS - Historical Notefirst, the veritable impossibility of effectively enforcing such an injunction; second, it would be very difficult to persuade a court that there are irreparable injuries which could not be redressed by a monetary award; and third, there is no precedent under the NLRB in an alleged case of individual discrimination.
-
967.
State – Agriculture, Decision 12886-A (PSRA, 2018) - 09/24/2018
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn May 25, 2018, Steven J. Nelson filed an unfair labor practice complaint alleging that the Washington State Department of Agriculture (employer) discriminated against him by terminating his employment.
-
968.
City of Pullman, Decision 11148-A (PECB, 2012) - 05/17/2012
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 1892 (union) filed an unfair labor practice complaint and two amended complaints alleging that the City of Pullman (employer) discriminated against bargaining unit employees and interfered with employee rights.
-
969.
Port of Shelton, Decision 8183-A (PECB, 2003) - 12/02/2003
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complaint was reviewed under WAC 391-45-110 and, following the issuance of a deficiency notice, a partial order of dismissal was issued indicating that limited interference and discrimination allegations stated a cause of action under RCW 41.56.140(1).[1] The employer filed an answer, and Examiner J. Martin Smith was
-
970.
Seattle School District, Decision 3355 (PECB, 1989) - 11/21/1989
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeA preliminary ruling letter was issued on April 25, 1989, characterizing the cause of action as an "interference or discrimination" allegation, but inquiring as to whether remedies ordered by the arbitrator may have completely resolved the matter.
-
971.
City of Seattle, Decision 3188 (PECB, 1989) - 04/12/1989
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complainant alleged discrimination and interference by the respondent, resulting in the complainant's termination, but indicated no nexus between the complainant's discharge from employment and any past or current union activity.[1] The complainant was informed that such a nexus was necessary in order for the complaint
-
972.
Snohomish County PUD, Decision 5804 (PECB, 1997) - 01/17/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicenoted that the Public Employment Relations Commission does not assert jurisdiction to remedy violations of collective bargaining agreements through the unfair labor practice provisions of the statute,[2] and that the Commission does not assert jurisdiction over allegations of discrimination on the basis of sex.
-
973.
King County (Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587), Decision 13453-A (PECB, 2022) - 05/12/2022
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeId. Additionally, the Administrator found that the complaints lacked sufficient facts to find a cause of action for union interference, union discrimination, or a breach of the union’s duty of fair representation.
-
974.
City of Yakima, Decision 9062 (PECB, 2005) - 08/24/2005
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn July 18, 2005, the union moved to amend the original complaint, to add allegations of “employer domination or assistance of union” and “employer discrimination for filing charges” to the case.
-
975.
State - Social and Health Services, Decision 6009 (PECB, 1997) - 08/25/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicethe Washington Department of Social and Health Services (employer) had committed unfair labor practices pursuant to Chapter 41.56 RCW. Specifically, the complainant asserted that the employer had interfered with his rights and had discriminated against him, in the selection of another employee to fill a vacant position.