1,430 result(s)
-
1,051.
City of Hoquiam, Decision 745 (PECB, 1979) - 10/23/1979
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge; [...] (3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge;
-
1,052.
Clover Park School District, Decision 13068 (EDUC, 2019) - 09/17/2019
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployer discrimination in violation of RCW 41.59.140(1)(c) [and if so derivative interference in violation of RCW 41.59.140(1)(a)] by disciplining Laurie Sison in retaliation for her exercising protected activity.
-
1,053.
Green River College, Decision 12528-A (CCOL, 2016) - 06/23/2016
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe first complaint alleged that Green River College (employer) discriminated against Hoeller.
-
1,054.
State - Health (Washington Federation of State Employees), Decision 12146 (PSRA, 2014) - 08/27/2014
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint in Case 26632-U-14-6786 concern employer discrimination in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(c) [and derivative interference in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(a)], by terminating the employment of French in reprisal for union activities protected by Chapter 41.80 RCW. The deficiency notice
-
1,055.
State - Employment Security, Decision 11525 (PSRA, 2012) - 10/25/2012
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer interference in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(a) and discrimination in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(c) [and if so, derivative interference in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(a)], by its actions toward Swanson.
-
1,056.
City of Seattle, Decision 10803 (PECB, 2010) - 07/06/2010
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn April 9, 2010, the International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 2829 (union) filed an unfair labor practice complaint alleging that the City of Seattle (employer) committed an unfair labor practice in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1) by discriminating against an employee who exercised protected employee rights.
-
1,057.
City of McCleary, Decision 10475 (PECB, 2009) - 07/09/2009
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer interference with employee rights and discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1) and refusal to bargain in violation of RCW 41.56.140(4), by its unilateral change in not granting annual wage increases to bargaining unit members, while granting wage increases to
-
1,058.
King County (Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587), Decision 8185 (PECB, 2003) - 09/08/2003
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint in Case 16760-U-02-4373 concern union interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41.56.150(1), discrimination against McCormick for filing an unfair labor practice charge in violation of RCW 41.56.150(3), and other unspecified unfair labor practices, by misrepresenting McCormick
-
1,059.
Port of Seattle (ILWU Local 9), Decision 6599 (PECB, 1999) - 02/08/1999
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe deficiency notice further pointed out that, although the box on the complaint form to allege “union discrimination for filing charges” was marked, none of the facts alleged in the accompanying statement of facts supported a claim under RCW 41.46.150(3).
-
1,060.
Seattle Colleges, Decision 5692 (CCOL, 1996) - 10/04/1996
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn July 17, 1996, Myron Miner filed a complaint charging unfair labor practices with the Public Employment Relations Commission under Chapter 391-45 WAC, alleging that Seattle Central Community College had discriminated against him in violation of RCW 28B.52.-073.
-
1,061.
Port of Tacoma, Decision 11978 (PORT, 2014) - 01/28/2014
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer discrimination (and if so, derivative interference) in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), by its issuing a written warning to Scott Smith (Smith), in reprisal for union activities protected by Chapter 41.56 RCW.
-
1,062.
State - Lottery, Decision 8098 (PSRA, 2003) - 06/05/2003
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practiceof employer misconduct occurring on or after August 2, 2000.The deficiency notices indicated that although the complaints did not specify a particular statutory violation, it appeared that the complaints were alleging a violation of employer discrimination for filing an unfair labor practice charge under RCW 41.56.140(3).
-
1,063.
Kitsap Fire District 2, Decision 7347 (PECB, 2001) - 03/27/2001
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicethe purposes of collective bargaining by IAFF, Local 4034 (union).The complaint alleged that Bainbridge Island Fire Department (employer) discriminated against Walters in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), by failing to implement a new job description for Walters’ position of Facilities and Equipment Coordinator/Firefighter.
-
1,064.
Tacoma Housing Authority, Decision 6816 (PECB, 1999) - 09/03/1999
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn August 17, 1998, Saul Padilla filed a complaint charging unfair labor practices with the Public Employment Relations under Chapter 391-45 WAC. Allegations that the Tacoma Housing Authority (employer) discriminated against Padilla by requiring his presence at a “mandatory EAP referral” meeting without permitting him to
-
1,065.
Sumner School District (IUOE Local 286), Decision 6364 (PECB, 1998) - 07/15/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe facts alleged do not set forth any basis for finding unlawful interference, restraint, coercion, or discrimination under RCW 41.56.150.
-
1,066.
King County, Decision 5720 (PECB, 1996) - 10/31/1996
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice[2] On the complaint against the employer, Hammond marked boxes to allege “interference”, “domination”, and “discrimination” violations.
-
1,067.
Oak Harbor School District (PSE of Oak Harbor), Decision 5497 (PECB, 1996) - 04/09/1996
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn a preliminary ruling letter issued on February 26, 1996, Kline wasadvisedofseveralproblemswithhiscomplaint.[2]These included his lack of legal standing to file a complaint on behalf of another employee, and the absence of any allegations that the union had discriminated against Kline (or aligned itself against his
-
1,068.
City of Spokane, Decision 5229 (PECB, 1995) - 08/17/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice2. The allegations contained in paragraphs 28 and following of the statement of facts, concerning failure of the employer to bargain in good faith and discrimination in reprisal for the exercise of rights under Chapter 41.56 RCW, state a cause of action for further proceedings under Chapter 391-45 WAC.
-
1,069.
Pierce County, Decision 3986 (PECB, 1992) - 01/29/1992
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practiceto make the required payments, so that, in the absence of any legal impediment to the union's demand for an initiation fee from Mr. Eaton, the union's threat to seek his discharge and/or the employer's acknowledgement of the possibility of his discharge cannot be a basis for any "interference" or "discrimination" claim.
-
1,070.
Port of Seattle (ILWU Local 9), Decision 3616 (PECB, 1990) - 11/02/1990
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeMr. Minetti may or may not have a basis for a citizen's suit against the Port of Seattle and its officials for bad management or harm "to the community at large", but he cannot process an employment discrimination claim in the absence of having sought the job that has allegedly been denied him.
-
1,071.
Skamania County, Decision 11865 (PECB, 2013) - 09/05/2013
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaints concern employer discrimination (and derivative interference) in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), by laying off O’Mahoney in reprisal for union activities protected by Chapter 41.56 RCW; and union interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41.56.150(1), by breach of its duty of
-
1,072.
Everett Community College, Decision 11135-B (CCOL, 2012) - 09/21/2012
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe American Federation of Teachers Washington (union) filed a complaint charging employer discrimination and employer refusal to bargain against the Everett Community College (employer).
-
1,073.
University of Washington, Decision 9772 (PSRA, 2007) - 06/27/2007
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn January 3, 2007, the Commission issued a preliminary ruling, finding causes of action to exist against the employer for interference with Mishra’s collective bargaining rights in violation of 41.80.110(1)(a) and discrimination in reprisal for protected union activities in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(c).
-
1,074.
State - Financial Management, Decision 9044 (PSRA, 2005) - 07/27/2005
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(a), domination or assistance of a union in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(b), and discrimination in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(c), by submitting the Governor’s budget proposal to the Legislature providing
-
1,075.
Jefferson Transit Authority (ATU Local 483), Decision 1901 (PECB, 1984) - 04/05/1984
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeA labor organization certified or recognized as exclusive bargaining representative of public employees enjoys, under RCW 41.56.080, a statutory status and privileges, and would not be at liberty to negotiate contractual provisions which discriminated on an impermissible basis against one or more sub-sets of the employees