Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision information:

Abstract: Reasons for Sentence

Decision Content





             R. v. Thrasher, 2008 NWTSC 37            S-1-CR-2007-000063



                IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES



                IN THE MATTER OF:





                                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



                                        - v -



                                KURTIS JAMES THRASHER





             __________________________________________________________

             Transcript of the Reasons for Sentence delivered by The

             Honourable Justice J.Z. Vertes, sitting in Inuvik, in the

             Northwest Territories, on the 15th day of May, A.D. 2008.

             __________________________________________________________



             APPEARANCES:

             Mr. P. Lepage:                 Counsel for the Crown

             Mr. P. Fuglsang:               Counsel for the Accused



               (Charge under s. 268 of the Criminal Code of Canada)










        Official Court Reporters





         1      THE COURT:             The accused, Kurtis James

         2          Thrasher, was convicted of the offence of

         3          aggravated assault after trial.

         4               The facts of the case were related in my

         5          reasons for convicting the accused.  Briefly

         6          stated, he was drinking with a group of youths,

         7          all of them apparently younger than he, in an

         8          abandoned house here in Inuvik.  One of the

         9          youths was attacked by an older man who came onto

        10          the scene.  He and another one of the youths came

        11          to the fellow's defence.  They punched the

        12          attacker and, in the process, the accused stabbed

        13          the older man; the victim in this case.

        14               The victim suffered multiple penetrating

        15          stab wounds, some of them life-threatening.

        16          There were 20 lacerations that had to be sutured,

        17          and there were four or five wounds that

        18          penetrated the victim's left lung.

        19               Crown counsel has pointed to a number of

        20          aggravating factors.  First, there is the

        21          excessive nature of the violence inflicted by the

        22          accused resulting in life-threatening injuries.

        23          Second, there is the accused's criminal record.

        24          He has 16 convictions in the past seven years,

        25          six of which are for crimes of violence.  Third,

        26          at the time of this offence, in January of 2007,

        27          he was on judicial interim release awaiting trial






       Official Court Reporters
                                        1





         1          on another offence of aggravated assault

         2          committed in June of 2006.  He was convicted of

         3          that charge in June of 2007 and sentenced to 12

         4          months' imprisonment, that sentence having

         5          expired in February of this year.

         6               Defence counsel submitted that I have to

         7          examine the overall circumstances, which he says

         8          are not as aggravating as Crown counsel submits.

         9          In defence counsel's words, this is not a case of

        10          gratuitous violence.  The accused was coming to

        11          the aid of the youth who was being beaten by the

        12          victim in this case who, himself, was the

        13          aggressor.

        14               I acknowledge that it is not a case of

        15          gratuitous violence, but it is certainly a case

        16          of excessive violence.  The sheer number of stab

        17          wounds is indicative of someone who was in an

        18          uncontrollable rage and anger.  I recognize the

        19          accused was drinking at the time, but the nature

        20          of this attack, combined with his criminal record

        21          and history of violence, demonstrates, at least

        22          to me, someone who is in serious need of control

        23          and treatment both for his own sake and for the

        24          sake of the safety of the community.  Otherwise,

        25          as I said directly to the accused a few minutes

        26          ago, he will simply end up leading a life of

        27          going in and out of jail.






       Official Court Reporters
                                        2





         1               Crown and defence counsel have provided me

         2          with a number of cases to assist me in coming to

         3          my decision.  Of course every case must be

         4          decided on the basis of its own facts and

         5          circumstances.  What those cases demonstrate,

         6          that in cases of convictions for aggravated

         7          assault, sentences vary generally anywhere from

         8          thirty months to five years.  Crown counsel in

         9          this case suggests that an appropriate sentence

        10          would be one of four to five years' imprisonment.

        11          But I must take into account the accused is only

        12          24 years old.  There must still be some hope of

        13          rehabilitation, so any sentence must not be so

        14          long as to destroy that.  The sentence, however,

        15          must still be meaningful enough to make the

        16          accused realized that now is his final chance to

        17          take control of his life and to change his

        18          future.

        19               I heard little about the accused's personal

        20          background.  I recognize that he is an aboriginal

        21          person, but I heard nothing regarding any

        22          systemic factors that may have led to his being

        23          before this court, and certainly nothing has been

        24          said to me about any alternative measures that

        25          would be appropriate in this case.  This is a

        26          crime of serious violence notwithstanding the

        27          overall circumstances that have been described to






       Official Court Reporters
                                        3





         1          me, and as I said before, a sentence must bring

         2          home to the accused that it is up to him to

         3          change his future.

         4               In my opinion, an appropriate effective

         5          sentence for this crime is one of three years'

         6          imprisonment.  I will give the accused credit of

         7          six months for the period of remand time he has

         8          spent since the expiration of his last sentence.

         9          Therefore, my sentence is that the accused serve

        10          a term of imprisonment of 30 months.  In

        11          addition, there will be the order requiring him

        12          to provide a sample for DNA analysis and

        13          submission to the DNA registration bank if that

        14          has not already been done so, and there will be a

        15          Section 109 order prohibiting the accused from

        16          having in his possession any firearms or

        17          ammunition or explosives for the rest of his life

        18          as required by the Criminal Code.  Under the

        19          circumstances, there will be no victim of crime

        20          fine surcharge.

        21               Is there anything that I have neglected,

        22          Mr. Lepage?

        23      MR. LEPAGE:            Not on sentence, Your Honour,

        24          just with regard to the exhibits.

        25      THE COURT:             Mr. Fuglsang, with respect to

        26          sentence?

        27      MR. FUGLSANG:          No; it's fine, Your Honour.






       Official Court Reporters
                                        4





         1      THE COURT:             Very well.  I will also direct

         2          that the exhibits be returned to the RCMP for

         3          safekeeping pending expiry of the appeal period,

         4          at which time certainly the knife that was

         5          submitted in evidence during the trial can be

         6          destroyed.

         7      MR. LEPAGE:            Thank you, Your Honour.

         8      THE COURT:             Thank you, gentlemen.  We are

         9          adjourned.

        10      THE COURT CLERK:       Thank you, sir.

        11               .................................

        12

        13

        14                        Certified Pursuant to Rule 723
                                  of the Rules of Court
        15

        16

        17
                                  Jane Romanowich, CSR(A), RPR
        18                        Court Reporter

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24

        25

        26

        27






       Official Court Reporters
                                        5   
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.