Supreme Court
Decision Information
Decision information:
Abstract: Transcript of the oral reasons for sentence
Decision Content
R. v. Mantla, 2007 NWTSC 06 S-1-CR-2006000081 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES IN THE MATTER OF: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN - and - JANICE HARRIET MANTLA _____________________________________________________ Transcript of the Oral Reasons for Sentence delivered by the Honourable Justice J.E. Richard, sitting at Yellowknife, in the Northwest Territories, on January 12th, A.D. 2007. _____________________________________________________ APPEARANCES: Mr. J. MacFarlane: Counsel for the Crown Ms. M.L. Nightingale: Counsel for the Accused (Charge under s. 380(1) Criminal Code) Official Court Reporters 1 THE COURT: The offender before the Court 2 to be sentenced is Janice Mantla, a 37-year-old 3 Dene woman from Behchoko. Her crime is fraud 4 contrary to section 380 of the Criminal Code for 5 which there is a maximum penalty of 14 years in 6 jail. 7 In brief, she was employed in a position 8 where the community trusted her to handle public 9 funds intended for people on social assistance, 10 and she unlawfully diverted many thousands of 11 dollars of those funds to herself and her family. 12 Ms. Mantla was one of the persons employed 13 in an office in her home community of Behchoko 14 where community members in need would go and make 15 application for public funds to assist them with 16 their daily or weekly basic living requirements; 17 i.e., social assistance or income support. It 18 is, of course, a merit based system, and 19 Ms. Mantla was one of the community persons 20 trusted with the responsibility of administering 21 this system intended for those in actual need. 22 As Behchoko is still a relatively small 23 community, characterized in part by a handful of 24 fairly large extended families and where 25 everybody pretty well knows everybody else, there 26 would naturally be a lot of stress, a lot of 27 pressure on anyone working in that office with Official Court Reporters 1 1 respect to individual applications for social 2 assistance or income support. Indeed, Ms. Mantla 3 tells the Court through her lawyer that she was, 4 during the time she worked in that office, 5 subjected to pressure with respect to individual 6 applications for social assistance from relatives 7 and friends of applicants and political or 8 community leaders. 9 It was within this environment, I am told, 10 that Ms. Mantla gave in to the temptation to 11 divert public funds entrusted to her to the use 12 of her own immediate family by unlawfully 13 arranging to have cheques issued that were 14 payable to her common-law husband and deposited 15 into the family bank account for reasons that 16 were stated to be for the benefit of other social 17 assistance recipients, but which reasons were 18 false or fictitious. 19 A later audit showed that Ms. Mantla did 20 this on 35 or more separate occasions in the time 21 period 1997 to 2002. The total amount of money 22 defrauded from the Territorial Government in this 23 manner by these many transactions was 24 approximately $22,300. 25 During the time that these fraudulent 26 transactions occurred, Ms. Mantla was, as stated, 27 gainfully employed earning a salary of Official Court Reporters 2 1 approximately $40,000. Her husband was also 2 employed most of the time. The point being that 3 they were able to support their family without 4 committing these frauds on the public social 5 assistance system. 6 I am told that Ms. Mantla consciously ceased 7 committing these frauds in 2002 following a 8 period of self-reflection while attending a 9 healing conference or session outside of her home 10 community. She knew then that what she had been 11 doing was wrong. 12 The fraudulent transactions were apparently 13 discovered by her employer in 2004, for in May, 14 2004 she was suspended from her employment 15 pending an investigation, and then in August, 16 2004 she was dismissed from that employment. 17 Ms. Mantla has had this matter hanging over 18 her head since that time, and she and her family 19 have suffered stress and anxiety during that 20 extended period. No doubt, in the small 21 community of Behchoko she and her family have 22 been the subject of much negative gossip and 23 derision. She has had difficulty obtaining 24 replacement employment. 25 The audit conducted by the Territorial 26 Government was concluded in August, 2004 and then 27 the matter was turned over to the RCMP for Official Court Reporters 3 1 possible criminal charges. As we have seen in 2 other fraud cases that have come before this 3 Court, unfortunately, due to limited resources 4 and the prevalence of much violent crime and 5 other crime in this jurisdiction, the RCMP are 6 unable to put any priority to an investigation of 7 this sort - i.e., so-called white collar crime - 8 with the result that the RCMP investigation in 9 this case was not concluded until the summer of 10 2006. 11 Criminal charges were laid against Janice 12 Mantla in July, 2006. She waived her Preliminary 13 Inquiry in Territorial Court in October, 2006, 14 and when she was, by consent, committed to stand 15 trial in this Court, she indicated it was her 16 intention to plead guilty. I take it there were 17 then some discussions between counsel as to the 18 precise charge to place before this Court for 19 disposition, but, in all of the circumstances, I 20 am satisfied that Ms. Mantla has entered a plea 21 of guilty at the earliest reasonable opportunity. 22 Subsequent to the time in 2004 that 23 Ms. Mantla was suspended from her employment in 24 the income support office she was able to obtain 25 casual short-term employment from time to time. 26 Once the Territorial Government, by its audit, 27 determined the amount of money that Ms. Mantla Official Court Reporters 4 1 had fraudulently taken from the Territorial 2 Government they garnisheed her final paycheque, 3 some of her casual paycheques and also an income 4 tax refund in 2005. In this way, they recovered 5 a total sum of $9,648. 6 In addition, Ms. Mantla on her own made 7 seven payments by way of restitution in the 8 period March, 2005 to March 2006. These 9 voluntary payments totalled $1,300, and I note 10 that they were made prior to the date that 11 criminal charges were laid against her. 12 In all, she has already made restitution in 13 the amount of $10,948.45, leaving the amount 14 outstanding and owing to the Territorial 15 Government in the amount of $11,378.91. 16 As part of the sentence imposed on Janice 17 Mantla, an order will issue pursuant to section 18 738 of the Criminal Code requiring Janice Mantla 19 to make restitution to the Government of the 20 Northwest Territories in the amount of 21 $11,378.91. 22 Counsel have kindly put before the Court for 23 its assistance copies of earlier sentencing 24 decisions of this Court in similar cases. It has 25 always been the practice of this Court in cases 26 of crimes of fraud or theft committed by persons 27 employed in a position of trust to impose a jail Official Court Reporters 5 1 term, absent exceptional circumstances, on 2 account of the important sentencing principle of 3 deterrence. Since the advent of the so-called 4 conditional sentence regime enacted by Parliament 5 about 10 years ago, it is not unusual for the 6 Court, in appropriate cases and in appropriate 7 circumstances, to order that the offender serve 8 the sentence of imprisonment not in a formal 9 physical correctional facility, but in the 10 offender's home community. 11 Janice Mantla's crime is a serious one 12 involving a breach of trust placed in her by her 13 community. It is an aggravating circumstance 14 that this crime is comprised of dozens of 15 fraudulent transactions over a period of years. 16 I am told that this offender, Janice Mantla, 17 is a person of otherwise good character with no 18 previous criminal record. There are a number of 19 written character references presented to the 20 Court on her behalf, and she has also presented 21 to the Court a written letter of apology. 22 Janice Mantla comes from a good family and 23 her parents are respected Elders in Behchoko. 24 She is known to be a person who looks after her 25 family and provides good care for her three 26 children and is a person who has done a lot of 27 volunteer work in the community, particularly Official Court Reporters 6 1 with the youth centre. It is to Janice Mantla's 2 credit that community people like Father Pochat 3 and Madeline Rabesca speak well of her. 4 Ms. Mantla has in the past year enrolled in 5 a teacher training education program and is 6 apparently doing well in that program and is 7 striving to achieve her goal of becoming a 8 full-fledged teacher in her home community. 9 This offender's early guilty plea, her 10 remorse and acceptance of full responsibility for 11 her wrongdoing, her apology to her family and 12 extended family, to the community and to the 13 Court, her voluntary payments and restitution, 14 these are all circumstances which act in 15 mitigation of sentence. 16 Crown counsel and defence counsel are in 17 agreement that a sentence of imprisonment is 18 required in this case. They are also in 19 agreement that allowing Ms. Mantla to serve her 20 sentence in the community would not endanger the 21 safety of the community and that such a 22 disposition would be consistent with the purposes 23 and principles of sentencing and previous 24 decisions of this Court. 25 Accordingly, I will impose a 12-month 26 conditional sentence with a list of conditions 27 that I will detail and also the section 738 Official Court Reporters 7 1 restitution order that I have mentioned. 2 Please stand, Ms. Mantla. Janice Mantla, 3 for the crime that you have committed, the crime 4 of fraud contrary to section 380 of the Criminal 5 Code, I impose a term of imprisonment of 12 6 months. Pursuant to section 742.1 of the 7 Criminal Code, I order that you serve your 8 sentence in the community of Behchoko subject to 9 the following conditions: 10 1) That you keep the peace and be of good 11 behaviour. 12 2) That you appear before this Court when 13 required to do so. 14 3) That you report to a supervisor within 15 two working days and thereafter as required by 16 the supervisor. 17 4) That you remain within the jurisdiction 18 of this Court unless written permission to leave 19 the jurisdiction is obtained from the Court or 20 the supervisor. 21 5) That you notify the Court or the 22 supervisor in advance of any change of name or 23 address and promptly notify the Court or the 24 supervisor of any change of employment or 25 occupation. 26 6) That you perform 120 hours of community 27 service over the first six months of your Official Court Reporters 8 1 sentence with a minimum of 10 hours in each month 2 as directed by your supervisor. 3 7) That you remain within your residence in 4 Behchoko at all times throughout the duration of 5 your sentence. The only absences or exceptions 6 to be the following: 7 (a) while attending at or travelling to and 8 from your place of employment; 9 (b) while attending at or travelling to and 10 from any place where you are receiving a formal 11 education or training program authorized by your 12 supervisor; 13 (c) for purposes of medical treatment or 14 care for yourself or members of your immediate 15 family; 16 (d) to attend regular Sunday church services 17 in your community; 18 (e) for purposes of performing community 19 service as ordered by the Court; 20 (f) for attending counselling sessions as 21 authorized by your supervisor; 22 (g) for travelling to and from your child's 23 daycare facility as authorized by your 24 supervisor; 25 (h) for attending meetings with your 26 supervisor; and 27 (i) for one continuous five-hour period each Official Court Reporters 9 1 week to attend to grocery shopping or other 2 household chores. 3 8) Make a minimum payment of $400 per month 4 towards satisfaction of the restitution order. 5 9) That you provide in writing to this 6 Court at the end of three months, six months, 7 nine months and 12 months of your sentence 8 confirmation signed by your supervisor that you 9 have complied with the conditions of your 10 conditional sentence. 11 10) Cooperate with your supervisor and the 12 RCMP regarding compliance with this order and 13 answer your telephone at home and attend in 14 person at the door of your residence as required. 15 You may take a seat, Ms. Mantla. 16 Ms. Mantla, after court is adjourned you will 17 have to stay here until the Clerk has had an 18 opportunity to prepare the formal court order and 19 to give you a copy of that order and to explain 20 it to you with the assistance of your lawyer, Ms. 21 Nightingale. 22 Ms. Mantla, I want you to know that during 23 the term of your sentence the supervisor can ask 24 the Court to make changes to these conditions, 25 and, also, the Crown prosecutor and yourself can 26 request the Court to make changes, and if there 27 is good reason, the Court will consider making Official Court Reporters 10 1 changes. 2 I also want you to know that if the Court 3 receives a report from the supervisor indicating 4 that you have breached any conditions, you will 5 be required to come to court and we will hear 6 from you, and the Court will consider at that 7 time whether this conditional sentence should be 8 terminated, and, if so, you will be required to 9 serve the rest of your 12-month sentence in jail. 10 Now, Ms. Mantla, I hope that you understand 11 what I have said to you, and if you have any 12 questions, you should ask your lawyer to explain 13 these things to you again in some more detail. I 14 wish you good luck. 15 Anything further in this case, counsel? 16 MR. MacFARLANE: Your Honour, I'm not sure if 17 it's Your Honour's practice to indicate to whom 18 the minimum monthly payment should be paid, to 19 the Clerk of the Court for the benefit of the 20 GNWT, if that should be a part of the order? 21 THE COURT: She can arrange that with the 22 supervisor. The payments can go directly to the 23 government, presumably. 24 MR. MacFARLANE: Very well. Thank you, sir. 25 THE COURT: But it is a condition of her 26 sentence that she make during the first 12 months 27 those regular contributions towards the larger Official Court Reporters 11 1 sum. Anything further, Ms. Nightingale? 2 MS. NIGHTINGALE: No. Thank you very much. 3 THE COURT CLERK: Any surcharge? 4 THE COURT: The victim fine surcharge will 5 be set at $100. Anything further, Madam Clerk? 6 THE COURT CLERK: No. 7 THE COURT: Thank you. Close court. 8 ..................................... 9 10 11 Certified to be a true and accurate transcript pursuant 12 to Rules 723 and 724 of the Supreme Court Rules. 13 14 ______________________________ 15 Jill MacDonald, CSR(A), RPR 16 Court Reporter 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Official Court Reporters 12
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.