Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC. V. CARRELL
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION (“FANNIE MAE”),
a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the
United States of America,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
REBECCA CARRELL, if living; if
deceased, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS
OF REBECCA CARRELL, deceased,
and JOHN DOE CARRELL, wife and
husband; CHERYL RICKS and
JOHN DOE RICKS, wife and husband;
GILBERT MAESTAS, if living; if
deceased, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF
GILBERT MAESTAS, deceased, and
MARY ALICE MAESTAS, if living; if
deceased, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF
MARY ALICE MAESTAS, deceased,
husband and wife; GULF COAST
INVESTMENT CORPORATION;
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; and
OCCUPANTS OF THE PROPERTY,
Defendants-Appellees.
NO. A-1-CA-37167
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 17, 2018
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Nancy J. Franchini, District Judge
COUNSEL
McCarthy Holthus, LLP, Joshua T. Chappell, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Rebecca Carrell, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellee
John Doe Carrell, Carlsbad, NM, Pro Se Appellee
Cheryl Ricks, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellee
Keith Ricks, a/k/a John Doe Ricks, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellee
Gilbert Maestas, unknown Pro Se Appellee
Mary Alice Maestas, unknown Pro Se Appellee
Gulf Coast Investment Corporation, unknown Pro Se Appellee
Citicorp Mortgage, Inc., a/k/a CitiMortgage, Inc., c/o CT Corp. System, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} REVERSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge