Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Quintana v. Tapia

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 07/28/2016
Docket Numbers 34,970
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL E. VIGIL; LINDA M. VANZI; TIMOTHY L. GARCIA
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - Quintana v. Tapia (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 07/28/2016
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,587 documents

Decision Content

QUINTANA V. TAPIA

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

DIEGO QUINTANA
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ABRAN TAPIA,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 34,970

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

July 28, 2016


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, Matthew J. Sandoval, District Judge

COUNSEL

Sommer Karnes & Associates, LLP, Karl H. Sommer, James R. Hawley, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Abran Tapia, Upland, CA, Pro Se Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: LINDA M. VANZI, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIGIL, Chief Judge.

{1}       Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.