1,430 result(s)
-
176.
Port of Seattle, Decision 6854-A (PECB, 2001) - 04/24/2001
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeJohnson described the nature of his grievance as “discrimination, retaliation, harassment. [...] ”Johnson alleged a violation of Sections 1.10 and 2.11(c), each relating to discrimination. [...] The employer denies that it engaged in any unlawful discrimination or reprisal in its personnel action with Johnson.
-
177.
University of Washington, Decision 13352-A (PSRA, 2022) - 01/27/2022
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn February 14, 2020, Marques Johnson (complainant) filed an unfair labor practice complaint alleging the employer interfered with employee rights and discriminated against him. [...] The complainant further alleged that the employer discriminated against Johnson when it did not select him to fill the vacant Campus Security Sergeant position. [...] The Examiner concluded that the employer neither interfered with employee rights nor discriminated against Johnson.
-
178.
Port of Shelton, Decision 8183 (PECB, 2003) - 09/04/2003
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeA violation concerning discrimination for filing unfair labor practice charges cannot stand absent evidence that the complainant has previously filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the Commission. [...] 1. Assuming all of the facts alleged to be true and provable, the interference and discrimination allegations of the complaint state a cause of action, summarized as follows: [...] The interference and discrimination allegations of the complaint will be the subject of further proceedings under Chapter 391-45 WAC.
-
179.
Port of Tacoma, Decision 4626-A (PECB, 1995) - 06/20/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeDiscrimination in regards to promotion . . . discrimination in regards to work opportunities . . . , as well as interference with protected rights by interrogation of employees concerning their union activities. [...] (3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge; [...] To make out a prima facie case, a complainant claiming unlawful discrimination needs to show:
-
180.
Seattle School District (Seattle Education Association), Decision 13443 (EDUC, 2021) - 12/03/2021
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeDiscrimination An employer unlawfully discriminates against an employee when it takes action in reprisal for the employee’s exercise of statutorily protected rights. [...] The complainant maintains the burden of proof in a discrimination case. [...] It is worth emphasizing that the discrimination claim properly before me concerns whether the district discriminated against Swenson in retaliation for this protected activity.
-
181.
Seattle School District, Decision 5946 (PECB, 1997) - 06/06/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFreer argues that the employer discriminated against her when it did not hire her for a position as a teaching assistant in the 1993 summer program. [...] Freer has not established sufficient evidence to conclude that a prima facie case of discrimination exists under the standard used by the Commission and the Supreme Court for discrimination charges. [...] [4] Such a causal connection must be established by a complainant for a charge of discrimination to prevail.
-
182.
Franklin County, Decision 13003 (PECB, 2019) - 05/17/2019
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeDiscrimination It is an unfair labor practice for an employer to discriminate against employees for engaging in union activity. [...] The complainant maintains the burden of proof in discrimination cases. [...] To prove discrimination, the complainant must first set forth a prima facie case establishing the following:
-
183.
Mill A School District, Decision 13015 (PECB, 2019) - 06/03/2019
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeDiscrimination An employer unlawfully discriminates against an employee when it takes action in reprisal for the employee’s exercise of statutorily protected rights. [...] The complainant maintains the burden of proof in a discrimination case. [...] A Prima Facie Case of Discrimination The union has established a prima facie case of discrimination.
-
184.
University of Washington, Decision 11091-A (PSRA, 2012) - 02/28/2012
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFacts Relating to Allegations of Employer Discrimination for Filing an Unfair Labor Practice [...] ISSUE 2 – Discrimination for Filing an Unfair Labor Practice Applicable Legal Standard [...] To prove discrimination, the complainant must first set forth a prima facie case of discrimination by establishing the following:
-
185.
Central Washington University, Decision 10118 (PSRA, 2008) - 07/01/2008
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFurther, there was no interference or discrimination because the Guild was not yet a recognized representative. [...] The complainant has the burden of establishing a prima facie case of discrimination. [...] 3. The employer did not discriminate in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(c).
-
186.
Grant County, Decision 13260 (PECB, 2020) - 11/19/2020
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIt is an unfair labor practice for an employer to discriminate against employees for engaging in union activity. [...] The complainant maintains the burden of proof in discrimination cases. [...] To prove discrimination, the complainant must first set forth a prima facie case establishing the following:
-
187.
City of Tacoma (IBEW Local 483), Decision 9306 (PECB, 2006) - 05/01/2006
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFour, the complaint refers to allegations of racial discrimination. The Commission does not have jurisdiction over allegations of race discrimination. [...] Four, as for the complaint against union official Phillips, the Commission does not have jurisdiction over allegations of race discrimination. [...] Four, as for the complaint against union official Phillips, the Commission does not have jurisdiction over allegations of race discrimination.
-
188.
Kitsap Regional Library System, Decision 13463 (PECB, 2022) - 01/13/2022
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe discrimination allegation of the complaint does not state a cause of action and is dismissed. [...] Discrimination Applicable Legal Standard It is an unfair labor practice for an employer to discriminate against employees for engaging in union activity. [...] The complainant maintains the burden of proof in discrimination cases.
-
189.
State - Transportation, Decision 12903 (PSRA, 2018) - 08/13/2018
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe discrimination allegation is dismissed at the preliminary ruling stage for failure to state a cause of action. [...] The complainant maintains the burden of proof in discrimination cases. [...] To prove discrimination, the complainant must first set forth a prima facie case establishing the following:
-
190.
Grays Harbor County, Decision 12691 (PECB, 2017) - 05/12/2017
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn contrast, the March 2016 employer discrimination allegation raises a deception or concealment argument. [...] The 2016 employer discrimination allegation states a cause of action and qualifies for further case processing. [...] The complaint and amended complaint state a cause of action for employer discrimination in March 2016.
-
191.
Western Washington University (PSE of Washington), Decision 11058 (PSRA, 2011) - 05/06/2011
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeJoens’s complaint alleged discrimination by Western Washington University (employer), and a claim against the union for inducing the employer to discriminate against Joens. [...] Regarding the claim of inducing the employer to discriminate, Joens must show that the union requested that the employer discriminate against him, and that it did so because of improper or invidious reasons. [...] Joens’s discrimination claim is based upon the allegation that he was terminated in reprisal for the union filing a grievance on his behalf.
-
192.
Lewis County, Decision 10511 (PECB, 2009) - 08/18/2009
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concerned employer interference and discrimination, and interference and refusal to bargain. [...] The deficiency notice indicated that a preliminary ruling would be issued concerning the interference and discrimination allegations. [...] The interference and discrimination allegations of the complaint will be the subject of further proceedings under Chapter 391-45 WAC.
-
193.
Snohomish County, Decision 7732 (PECB, 2002) - 05/29/2002
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice2. Assuming all of the facts alleged to be true and provable, the interference and discrimination allegations under RCW 41.56.140(1), and the discrimination allegations for filing an unfair labor practice charge under RCW 41.56.140(3) in Case 16330-U-02-4177 state a cause of action, summarized as follows: [...] Employer interference with employee rights and discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), and discrimination for filing an unfair labor practice charge in violation of RCW 41.56.140(3), by comments in a letter of April 2, 2002 from Director of Human Resources Bridget Clawson that the employer would seek sanctions from [...] The interference, discrimination, and discrimination for filing an unfair labor practice charge allegations of the complaint will be the subject of further proceedings under Chapter 391-45 WAC.
-
194.
Tacoma School District, Decision 7141 (EDUC, 2000) - 08/03/2000
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeA of the previous agreement, violates two additional statutes: 1) Interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41. 59. 140(1)(a);and 2) Discrimination for filing an unfair labor practice charge in violation of RCW 41. 59. 140(1)(d). [...] 1. The allegation of the original complaint against the employer concerning employer discrimination for failure to pay Mehlhaff for November 1, 1999, as well as the allegation of the original complaint against the union concerning union interference and discrimination for refusal to request arbitration of a grievance filed [...] Employer interference with employee rights and discrimination in violation of RCW 41. 59. 140(1)(a) and (c), and employer discrimination for filing an unfair labor practice charge in violation of RCW 41. 59. 140(1)(d), by negotiating Sections 27 and 57.
-
195.
Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families, Decision 13391 (PSRA, 2021) - 08/10/2021
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeRodriguez asserts the employee plan violated the Washington Law Against Discrimination, chapter 49.60 RCW. [...] The complainant maintains the burden of proof in discrimination cases. [...] To prove discrimination, the complainant must first set forth a prima facie case establishing the following:
-
196.
King County (King County Corrections Guild), Decision 12902 (PECB, 2018) - 08/09/2018
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice3. Union discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.040, when the union unseated Weaver as union president. [...] Discrimination Generally, there are two types of union discrimination violations that this agency will process. [...] b. union discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.040, when the union unseated Weaver as union president;
-
197.
Okanogan Public Hospital District 4, Decision 5809-A (PECB, 1997) - 06/05/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge; [...] A complainant has the burden to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. [...] The complainant established a prima facie case of discrimination in this case.
-
198.
Kitsap Transit, Decision 10657 (PECB, 2010) - 01/26/2010
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe union maintains the burden of proof in employer discrimination cases. [...] Where the union establishes a prima facie case, it creates a rebuttable presumption of discrimination. [...] In discrimination cases, the employer need only produce non-discriminatory reasons for its action.
-
199.
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (Washington Federation of State Employees), Decision 13106 (PSRA, 2019) - 12/06/2019
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeDiscrimination Employees can file discrimination allegations against the union related to filing a complaint or providing testimony before PERC. An employee can also file a union discrimination allegation related to the union inducing the employer to commit a violation. [...] The only type of discrimination that the Commission can address is discrimination for engaging in (or refraining from) protected union activity. [...] The complaint does not allege that Blais was discriminated against for engaging in protected union activity.
-
200.
King County, Decision 10500-A (PECB, 2010) - 02/02/2010
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practiceon the basis of racial and gender discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1); attempted to dominate the union in violation of RCW 41.56.140(2); discriminated against her for filing a contractual grievance in violation of RCW 41.56.140(3); violated the non-discrimination provisions of the collective bargaining [...] • Wilson’s allegation that the employer allegedly discriminated against her for filing a grievance was based upon events that occurred on March 19, 2008. [...] [3] For example, Wilson claimed that the employer discriminated against her based upon her race and gender.