1,430 result(s)
-
1,376.
Snohomish County, Decision 1868 (PECB, 1984) - 03/06/1984
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeWhile little progress was made on economic issues, the parties reached tentative agreement on a number of non-economic matters, including retention of the management rights/non-discrimination clause found in the original contract.
-
1,377.
Okanogan County, Decision 2252 (PECB, 1985) - 12/11/1985
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeNo public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining, or in
-
1,378.
City of Edmonds v. Teamsters (4135-I-82) - 04/15/1983
INTEREST ARBITRATIONS - Interest ArbitrationHe feels no discrimination if he stays abreast of other workers in his industry, his
-
1,379.
City of Hoquiam v. IAFF (2468-I-79) - 03/19/1980
INTEREST ARBITRATIONS - Interest ArbitrationPossibilities of discrimination or chicanery under the City's proposal would exist thus vitiating the principles of seniority
-
1,380.
Lincoln County (Teamsters Local 690), Decision 12844 (PECB, 2018) - 04/03/2018
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn November 18 and December 8, 2016, the union filed amended complaints asserting discrimination in addition to unilateral change and refusal to bargain.
-
1,381.
City of Bremerton, Decision 3843-A (PECB, 1994) - 06/03/1994
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe BPA alleged that the City of Bremerton had engaged in a pattern of interference and discrimination in reprisal for union activity among its employees, and that it refused to provide the union with requested information concerning discipline imposed on Robert Waldroop.
-
1,382.
City of Bremerton, Decision 4738 (PECB, 1994) - 06/03/1994
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe BPA alleged that the City of Bremerton had engaged in a pattern of interference and discrimination in reprisal for union activity among its employees, and that it refused to provide the union with requested information concerning discipline imposed on Robert Waldroop.
-
1,383.
Port of Pasco, Decision 4021 (PECB, 1992) - 03/30/1992
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe employer’s conduct was found to constitute both a discrimination and interference violation.
-
1,384.
City of Yakima, Decision 3503-A (PECB, 1990) - 10/29/1990
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn Enumclaw, a superior court and the Washington State Human Rights Commission had concurrent jurisdiction to enforce the law against discrimination.[9] The court held that, when the jurisdiction of two tribunals is invoked concerning the same subject or controversy, the tribunal first obtaining jurisdiction has the power
-
1,385.
City of Olympia, Decision 1208 (PECB, 1981) - 07/24/1981
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicea. Discharging or otherwise discriminating against any employee because of the exercise of the right to organize and designate representatives for the purpose of collective bargaining.
-
1,386.
East Valley School District – Spokane, Decision 13114 (PECB, 2019) - 12/19/2019
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice1. The union must treat all factions and segments of its membership without hostility or discrimination.
-
1,387.
Snohomish County v. Teamsters Local 763 (25996-I-13) - 10/15/2014
INTEREST ARBITRATIONS - Interest ArbitrationThe Union would add language requiring all provisions of Article 9 to be applied in compliance with the American with Disabilities Act and the Washington Law Against Discrimination.
-
1,388.
Port of Seattle (Seattle/King County Building and Construction Trades Council and HOD Carriers and Gen Laborers Local 242), Decision 6181 (PORT, 1998) - 02/09/1998
DECISIONS - Unit ClarificationNo public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining, or in the
-
1,389.
Seattle School District, Decision 5542-C (PECB, 1997) - 06/05/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeArbitrators have no particular expertise in other issues, however, and the Commission does not defer "interference", "domination", or "discrimination" allegations, or other types of "refusal to bargain" charges, where the dispute is not susceptible to resolution through contractual grievance proceedings.
-
1,390.
City of Tacoma, Decision 5634 (PECB, 1996) - 08/14/1996
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeSee, Allison v. Seattle Housincr Authority, 118 Wn.2d 79 (1991), applying the state law against discrimination, Chapter 49.60 RCW, against a public entity in a case of a type where reinstatement and back pay are possible remedies.[17]
-
1,391.
Naches Valley School District, Decision 2516 (EDUC, 1987) - 01/09/1987
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThis doctrine is taken from Calhoon v. Harvey, 379 U.S. 134, 57 LRRM 2561 (1964), which held that section 101(a) was "no more than a command that members and classes of members shall not be discriminated against in their right to nominate [officers] and vote". 379 U.S. at 139; 57 LRRM at 2563.
-
1,392.
City of Richland, Decision 1519 (PECB, 1982) - 11/08/1982
DECISIONS - Election"No public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining, or in
-
1,393.
City of Lynnwood v. Teamsters (2566-I-80) - 07/23/1980
INTEREST ARBITRATIONS - Interest Arbitrationdiscrimination (Article XXI). The City states that, in contrast, all it receives from the
-
1,394.
State – Ecology, Decision 12732 (PSRA, 2017) - 06/19/2017
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe focus on reasonable perception in interference cases is different than the requirement in discrimination cases that an employee have actually engaged in protected activity.
-
1,395.
State - Adult Family Home Providers, Decision 12345 (PECB, 2015) - 05/28/2015
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployees covered by Chapter 41.56 RCW have the right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for purposes of collective bargaining or exercise other rights under the chapter free from interference, restraint, coercion, or discrimination.
-
1,396.
City of Mountlake Terrace, Decision 11702-A (PECB, 2014) - 03/20/2014
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice13. By imposing two disciplinary penalties as described in Finding of Fact 7, the employer did not discriminate against Delsin Thomas in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1).
-
1,397.
Snohomish County v. Teamsters Local 763 (25996-I-13) - 10/08/2013
INTEREST ARBITRATIONS - Interest ArbitrationI. Compliance with ADA, Section 9.11 The Union would add language requiring all provisions of Article 9 to be applied in compliance with the American with Disabilities Act and the Washington Law Against Discrimination.
-
1,398.
City of Spokane, Decision 11263 (PECB, 2011) - 12/22/2011
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe Public Employees’ Collective Bargaining Act, Chapter 41.56 RCW states at RCW 41.56.040: “No public employer . . . shall . . . interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their
-
1,399.
City of Bellevue v. IAFF (14037-I-98) - 09/17/1999
INTEREST ARBITRATIONS - Interest Arbitrationreceive and that they will feel no discrimination if they determine that their income is
-
1,400.
Seattle School District, Decision 5733-B (PECB, 1998) - 05/19/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn 1988, union Business Manager Dale Daugharty filed a discrimination charge under Title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, protesting claimed ill effects of a one-period lunch on poverty-level students and minority groups.