1,430 result(s)
-
1,176.
Green River College, Decision 3861 (CCOL, 1991) - 09/06/1991
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticePARAGRAPH 9 alleges discrimination on unspecified dates against an unnamed union official.
-
1,177.
Seattle King Public Health (AFGE Local 1170), Decision 2537 (PECB, 1986) - 10/03/1986
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeBy way of contrast, Elma School District (Elma Teachers Organization), Decision 1349 (PECB, 1982), involved allegations of breach of the duty of fair representation arising out of a motive of discrimination against a grievant because of her previous support of another labor organization.
-
1,178.
Icicle Irrigation District, Decision 1177 (PECB, 1981) - 06/08/1981
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge;
-
1,179.
Clark Public Utilities, Decision 4563 (PECB, 1993) - 12/22/1993
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeRCW 41.56.040 RIGHT OF EMPLOYEES TO ORGANIZE AND DESIGNATE REPRESENTATIVES WITHOUT INTERFERENCE. No public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and [...] (3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge; [...] The second of those decisions incorporated the first decision, in toto, and found a cause of action to exist on "discrimination" allegations filed by 10 individual employees against this employer and their union.
-
1,180.
City of Pacific (Teamsters Local 117), Decision 13387 (PECB, 2021) - 08/03/2021
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice[2] In July 2020 Slagter filed an inquiry with the Washington State Human Rights Commission and the Commission assisted in drafting a complaint of discrimination and retaliation with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
-
1,181.
Tumwater School District (Tumwater Office Professionals Association), Decision 12409-A (PECB, 2016) - 01/14/2016
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployees covered by Chapter 41.56 RCW have the right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for purposes of collective bargaining or exercise other rights under the chapter free from interference, restraint, coercion, or discrimination.
-
1,182.
City of Spokane (WSCCCE), Decision 9731 (PECB, 2007) - 06/11/2007
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint in Case 20646‑U‑06‑5258 concern employer domination or assistance of a union in violation of RCW 41.56.140(2) and discrimination for filing an unfair labor practice charge in violation of RCW 41.56.140(3), by its violation of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement related to the
-
1,183.
SNOCOM, Decision 3289 (PECB, 1989) - 09/25/1989
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeImportantly, the association does not allege here that it has been accused of any wrongdoing, either directly or indirectly.[4] Nor does it allege that the employer has committed any "interference" or "discrimination".
-
1,184.
Ben Franklin Transit, Decision 1906 (PECB, 1984) - 05/03/1984
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeNo public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining, or any other
-
1,185.
Green River College, Decision 12611 (PSRA, 2016) - 08/18/2016
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe union alleged the employer discriminated and interfered with employee rights under RCW 41.80.110(1)(a) by selecting a union shop steward for a special “desk audit” and changing his work schedule.
-
1,186.
City of Seattle, Decision 12415 (PECB, 2015) - 09/10/2015
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn order to have a discrimination or interference allegation the facts would have to show union activity prior to the hostile work environment and a causal connection between the union activity and the adverse action.
-
1,187.
Spokane Airport Board, Decision 12085 (PECB, 2014) - 06/11/2014
DECISIONS - ElectionNo public employer may interfere with, restrain, coerce or discriminate against any public employee in the “free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing ...” RCW 41.56.040.
-
1,188.
State - Revenue, Decision 9422 (PSRA, 2006) - 09/01/2006
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployers generally may restrict employee use of its property for distribution purposes, but may not do so in ways that discriminate against protected communications as opposed to other kinds of non‑job‑related uses.
-
1,189.
King County, Decision 6994 (PECB, 2000) - 03/13/2000
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe above-captioned proceedings were initiated by unfair labor practice complaints filed with the Commission under Chapter 391-45 WAC. International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, Local 17 (union), alleged that the employer violated RCW 41.56.140, by discrimination in regard to administration of
-
1,190.
Washington State Ferries, MEC Decision 223 (2000) - 02/09/2000
MARINE EMPLOYEES COMMISSION - Marine Employees CommissionThe change was made for valid business reasons and was not motivated by anti-union animus or discrimination.
-
1,191.
City of Prosser (OPEIU Local 11), Decision 6028 (PECB, 1997) - 08/28/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice• The Commission does police its certifications, and will assert jurisdiction over “breach of duty of fair representation” allegations where an exclusive bargaining representative is alleged to have aligned itself in interest against one or more bargaining unit employees on invidious grounds, such as discrimination on the
-
1,192.
City of Renton, Decision 5138 (PECB, 1995) - 07/06/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeAlthough RCW 41.56.040 provides that no public employer shall interfere with or discriminate against a public employee in the free exercise of a right to organize and designate a representative for the purpose of collective bargaining, RCW 41.56.120 expressly provides that nothing contained in Chapter 41.56 RCW permits or
-
1,193.
Emergency Dispatch Center, Decision 1770 (PECB, 1983) - 11/02/1983
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeNevertheless, the references were and are taken as allegations of interference and discrimination in connection with an attempt by employees to organize for the purpose of collective bargaining under RCW 41.56.
-
1,194.
City of Mercer Island, Decision 1026-A (PECB, 1981) - 05/05/1981
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeMoreover, we agree with the Hearing Examiner's conclusions and reasoning that the employer's reorganization in this case unlawfully discriminated against the employees who suffered therefrom.
-
1,195.
Shelton School District, Decision 485-B (EDUC, 1979) - 11/29/1979
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practiceb. Coercing employees by promising benefits or threatening reprisals or discriminating against employees in regard to probation or any other condition of employment in order to discourage membership in the Shelton Education Association or any other employee organization.
-
1,196.
Yakima County, Decision 13347 (PECB, 2021) - 05/11/2021
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeAs referenced above, it is an unfair labor practice for a public employer to discriminate against, interfere with, restrain, or coerce public employees in the exercise of their collective bargaining rights.
-
1,197.
Northshore Utility District, Decision 10304 (PECB, 2009) - 02/20/2009
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicewill and sending an internal union memorandum to employees concerning the 2009 COLA. The Commission has no jurisdiction over internal union affairs, including union communications with its members, barring a showing of retaliation for union activities or invidious discrimination based upon such factors as race or gender.
-
1,198.
Kitsap County, Decision 8402-B (PECB, 2007) - 05/09/2007
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe NLRB found that while the employer may have been “lax in its recording practices, absent discrimination, an employer is free to choose more dependable methods for enforcing workplace rules.” Thus, even though the employer utilized technology to more closely track employee hours, the technology itself was simply a tool
-
1,199.
Whatcom County, Decision 8512-A (PECB, 2005) - 03/11/2005
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe “burden shifting” approach supported by the DSG as an alternative to a per se approach is reminiscent of the approach used by the NLRB in deciding discrimination cases under Wright Line, 251 NLRB 1083 (1980).[2] The DSG would only undertake to make out a prima facie case showing a probability of the parity clause
-
1,200.
Pomeroy School District (Washington Education Association), Decision 1610 (EDUC, 1983) - 04/11/1983
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeDiscrimination by an employee organization against a bargaining unit employee because of the employee's previous support of a different employee organization can constitute an unfair labor practice under Chapter 41.59 RCW. See: Elma School District, Decision 1349 (EDUC, 1982).