1,430 result(s)
-
1,126.
City of Walla Walla, Decision 104 (PECB, 1976) - 09/02/1976
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFurthermore, none of the documents contain any reference to evidence which would support an allegation that the employer has engaged in conduct prohibited by the interference, domination or discrimination proscriptions of RCW 41.56.140.
-
1,127.
City of Yakima, Decision 4 (PECB, 1976) - 01/20/1976
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(1) To interfere with, restrain, or coerce public employees in the exercise of their rights guaranteed by this chapter; (2) to control, dominate or interfere with a bargaining representative; (3) to discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge; (4) to refuse to engage in collective
-
1,128.
Washington State Ferries, MEC Decision 119 (1994) - 07/06/1994
MARINE EMPLOYEES COMMISSION - Marine Employees Commission6) Has the employer applied its rules, orders and penalties evenhandedly and without discrimination to all employees? [...] In attempting to evaluate the question, “Has WSF applied the gun rule and penalty evenhandedly and without discrimination to all employees?
-
1,129.
Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families (Washington Federation of State Employees), Decision 13774-A (PSRA, 2024) - 04/16/2024
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFornara alleged the WFSE breached its duty of fair representation by not advancing her grievances and that the WFSE had discriminated against her for filing unfair labor practice complaints.
-
1,130.
Benton County, Decision 13710-A (PECB, 2023) - 09/18/2023
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn December 19, 2022, an Unfair Labor Practice Administrator issued a preliminary ruling finding a cause of action for employer discrimination by placing Gilmore on light duty in reprisal for union activities.
-
1,131.
King County (Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587), Decision 13535-A (PECB, 2023) - 01/27/2023
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complainant has not proven that the union discriminated against him or acted in an arbitrary manner in processing the grievance.
-
1,132.
Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (Washington Public Employees Association), Decision 13191-A (PSRA, 2020) - 06/25/2020
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn response, the union argued that substantial evidence does not support finding that the union discriminated against the complainant or treated him with hostility because he was a probationary employee.
-
1,133.
State – Individual Providers (Service Employees International Union 775), Decision 12864 (PECB, 2018) - 05/02/2018
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeCity of Seattle (Seattle Police Officers’ Guild), Decision 11291-A. The Commission asserts jurisdiction in duty of fair representation cases when an employee alleges its union aligned itself in interest against employees it represents based on invidious discrimination.
-
1,134.
King County (King County Security Officers Guild), Decision 12807 (PECB, 2017) - 12/18/2017
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeCity of Seattle (Seattle Police Officers’ Guild), Decision 11291-A. The Commission asserts jurisdiction in duty of fair representation cases when an employee alleges its union aligned itself in interest against employees it represents based on invidious discrimination.
-
1,135.
Kiona-Benton City School District, Decision 11563-A (EDUC, 2013) - 11/21/2013
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe Examiner dismissed the unfair labor practice complaint finding the Kiona Benton School District (employer) did not discriminate against three employees, as alleged in the union’s complaint and amended complaints.
-
1,136.
Columbia Basin College (Washington Education Association), Decision 8295 (CCOL, 2003) - 12/10/2003
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint in Case 17220-U-03-4455 concern union interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 28B.52.073(2)(a), discrimination for filing an unfair labor practice charge in violation of RCW 28B.52.073(2)(c), and violation of RCW 41.56.080, by failing to represent Gary Bullert in the processing
-
1,137.
State - Labor and Industries, Decision 8261 (PSRA, 2003) - 10/31/2003
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the amended complaint in Case 17606-U-03-4556 concern employer interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1) and discrimination for filing an unfair labor practice charge in violation of RCW 41.56.140(3), by refusing to grant Dale Pettit release time during working hours to research,
-
1,138.
Bethel School District (PSE of Washington), Decision 6847 (PECB, 1999) - 10/12/1999
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeParsons has not alleged facts sufficient to form a conclusion that any union action (or inaction) regarding her employment was caused by unlawful discrimination (such as on the basis of race, color, creed, sex, national origin), which would call into question the union’s right to enjoy the benefits of statutory status as
-
1,139.
Lake Washington Technical College (Washington Federation of Teachers), Decision 6742 (CCOL, 1999) - 07/16/1999
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeUnder Section 8 (a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, union security agreements are permitted as an exception to a general rule which makes it an unfair labor practice for employers to discriminate for or against union membership.
-
1,140.
City of Seattle, Decision 6408 (PECB, 1998) - 08/28/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice• An allegation that Welch was facing a disciplinary demotion, was insufficiently detailed, and the box to claim a discrimination violation was not marked on the complaint form.
-
1,141.
Soap Lake School District, Decision 6194 (PECB, 1998) - 02/26/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicec. Paragraphs 8 and 9, alleging that the employer discriminated against Becky Larsen, by discharging her for her filing and pursuit of grievances.
-
1,142.
City of Seattle, Decision 3470-A (PECB, 1990) - 08/06/1990
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThose factual assertions do not, however, support a conclusion that any duty of fair representation breach resulted from the kind of discrimination or union activity that will cause the Commission to assert jurisdiction.
-
1,143.
Spokane County, Decision 2674 (PECB, 1987) - 04/23/1987
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeSimilarly, an employer is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of union membership or lack thereof.
-
1,144.
Fort Vancouver Regional Library, Decision 2396-A (PECB, 1986) - 07/02/1986
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge;
-
1,145.
Spokane Transit Authority, Decision 2078-A (PECB, 1985) - 08/23/1985
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeAn employer can discharge or demote an employee for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all, so long as the reason is other than anti‑union discrimination.
-
1,146.
Renton School District, Decision 2004 (PECB, 1984) - 07/25/1984
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn an amendment to her original motion, Ms. Crutchfield argues that the union discriminated against her and others in her class by limiting salary settlement in a successor contract resolving an unfair labor practice charge to current employees.
-
1,147.
Clallam County, Decision 1405-A (PECB, 1982) - 10/29/1982
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeExaminer Rex L. Lacy of the Commission staff entered his findings of fact, conclusions of law and order in the captioned matter on April 29, 1982, wherein he determined that Clallam County had discharged Mark Baker in discrimination for Baker's attempt to process grievances under the collective bargaining agreement between
-
1,148.
Washington State Individual Providers v. SEIU 775 (132959-I-20, 2020) - 09/28/2020
INTEREST ARBITRATIONS - Interest Arbitration• Article 13 – No Discrimination • Article 14 – Referral Registry • Article 15 – Training [...] The Union strongly built its case around what it called the historical pattern of discrimination related to wages and benefits paid to women and minorities. [...] Since home healthcare employees are typically women and minorities this clearly denoted pattern of discrimination has worked to keep wages quite low.
-
1,149.
Columbia Basin College (Washington Public Employees Association), Decision 9210 (PSRA, 2006) - 01/23/2006
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeSpecifically, the Commission has limited its jurisdiction in DFR cases to situations where a union is alleged to have aligned itself against a bargaining unit employee on the basis of union membership (or lack thereof) or discriminated against a bargaining unit employee on some invidious basis.[9] In at least one case, the [...] Both the title and content of the second e-mail demonstrates discrimination or bias under the DFR test against non-union members. [...] However, again the night and custodial workers did not receive the e-mail via e-mail, and by limiting the group to only members an inference of discrimination or bias under the DFR test is raised when looking at the totality of the circumstances.
-
1,150.
Seattle Housing Authority, Decision 13777 (PECB, 2024) - 01/24/2024
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn September 12, 2022, a preliminary ruling was issued in case 135318-U-23 for employer discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.140(3).