1,430 result(s)
-
1,101.
Seattle School District (Seattle Education Association), Decision 9700 (EDUC, 2007) - 06/01/2007
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint in Case 20630-U-06-5254 concern employer discrimination in violation of RCW 41.59.140(1)(c), by its transfer of Robert Femiano in reprisal for union activities protected by Chapter 41.59 RCW. The deficiency notice indicated that the complaint was defective for the following reason:
-
1,102.
Tacoma Housing Authority, Decision 7390-A (PECB, 2002) - 02/13/2002
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice[1] The underlying complaint alleges employer interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), employer domination of or assistance to the union in violation of RCW 41.56.140(2), employer discrimination for the filing of unfair labor practice charges in violation of RCW 41.56.140(3), and employer refusal
-
1,103.
City of Bellingham, Decision 7040 (PECB, 2000) - 04/26/2000
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployer interference and discrimination, in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), by its actions to eliminate the position held by Mary McHugh and reassign McHugh to a lesser position.
-
1,104.
Bremerton School District, Decision 6223 (PECB, 1998) - 02/25/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice3. A June 29, 1997 “Statement of Formal Grievance” from the complainant, alleges that he is “being harassed, discriminated against and treated unfairly” by his supervisor.
-
1,105.
Clark Public Transportation Benefit Area (Amalgamated Transit Union), Decision 2052 (PECB, 1984) - 10/10/1984
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeA labor organization certified or recognized as exclusive bargaining representative of public employees enjoys, under RCW 41.56.080, a statutory status and certain privileges, and would not be at liberty to negotiate or administer contractual provisions in a manner which discriminated on an impermissible basis against one
-
1,106.
City of Bremerton, Decision 1935 (PECB, 1984) - 09/28/1984
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeElma School District, Decision 1349 (PECB, 1982) involved allegations of discrimination against a grievant because of her previous support of another labor organization.
-
1,107.
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) (ATU Local 757), Decision 1695 (PECB, 1983) - 08/15/1983
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeBy contrast, Elma School District (Elma Teachers Organization), Decision 1349 (EDUC, 1982), involved allegations of discrimination against a grievant because of her previous support of another labor organization.
-
1,108.
King County, Decision 13229 (PECB, 2020) - 09/01/2020
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployees covered by chapter 41.56 RCW have the right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for purposes of collective bargaining or exercise other rights under the chapter free from interference, restraint, coercion, or discrimination.
-
1,109.
Green River College, Decision 12528-C (CCOL, 2019) - 04/30/2019
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe issue before the Commission is whether the employer discriminated against Hoeller.
-
1,110.
The Evergreen State College, Decision 12766 (PSRA, 2017) - 08/18/2017
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complaint also alleges that on May 26, of an unspecified year, three residence assistants were discussing the possibility of a large portion of the resident assistant team going on strike to protest discrimination and poor working conditions.
-
1,111.
Shoreline Community College, Decision 10667 (CCOL, 2010) - 02/03/2010
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe amended complaint alleges employer interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 28B.52.073(1)(a) and discrimination in violation of RCW 28B.52.073(1)(c).
-
1,112.
King County, Decision 9075 (PECB, 2005) - 08/29/2005
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFurther, in King County the Commission chose not to address the appeal of an examiner’s findings concerning a discrimination violation and an independent interference violation that were not listed in the preliminary ruling.
-
1,113.
State - Individual Providers, Decision 8241 (PECB, 2003) - 10/09/2003
DECISIONS - Election[2] Such an inherent authority has also been recognized (without explicit reference in any statute or rule) in regard to “breach of duty of fair representation” claims where a union is accused of bringing its status as exclusive bargaining representative to bear to effect invidious discrimination.
-
1,114.
Dayton School District (Dayton Education Association), Decision 8042 (EDUC, 2003) - 05/02/2003
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe amended complaint does not contain factual allegations concerning the union aligning itself against Stoermer on the basis of union membership, or allegations that the union is discriminating on the basis of race or some other improper or invidious basis.
-
1,115.
King County (IFPTE Local 17), Decision 5296 (PECB, 1995) - 10/06/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complaint, as amended, contains conclusionary statements that the union discriminates against unidentified agency fee payors by not explaining its obligations or their rights to them.
-
1,116.
City of Fircrest, Decision 5094 (PECB, 1995) - 05/23/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice1. The complaint charging unfair labor practices filed in the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED as untimely under RCW 41.56.160, with respect to allegations that the employer interfered with the rights of employees and/or discriminated against employees prior to September 9, 1994.
-
1,117.
Pierce Transit (ATU), Decision 4094 (PECB, 1992) - 06/12/1992
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice[2] The few exceptions focus on union actions which both discriminate on some unlawful basis and have an effect on the wages, hours or working conditions of an employee, so as to be a breach of the "duty of fair representation".
-
1,118.
Pierce Fire District 2, Decision 4063 (PECB, 1992) - 05/04/1992
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeAny "discrimination" violation found under RCW 41.56.140(1) must involve the deprivation of a known right for an unlawful reason.
-
1,119.
Lewis Public Hospital District 1, Decision 3836 (PECB, 1991) - 08/06/1991
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe supplemental documents still fail to allege that the employer has discriminated against the complainant for engaging in union activity protected by Chapter 41.56 RCW.
-
1,120.
METRO, Decision 3151-B (PECB, 1990) - 10/17/1990
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeExaminer Katrina I. Boedecker issued a decision on March 6, 1989, ruling that ATU had committed unfair labor practices in violation of RCW 41.56.150(4) and (1).[2] The Examiner held that Zafiropoulos had been discriminated against when the union denied him the right to choose certain bus routes, by deleting those routes
-
1,121.
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) (ATU Local 587), Decision 2746-C (PECB, 1990) - 10/17/1990
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeExaminer Katrina I. Boedecker issued a decision on March 6, 1989, ruling that ATU had committed unfair labor practices in violation of RCW 41.56.150(4) and (1).[2] The Examiner held that Zafiropoulos had been discriminated against when the union denied him the right to choose certain bus routes, by deleting those routes
-
1,122.
City of Yakima, Decision 2387-B (PECB, 1986) - 10/03/1986
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge;
-
1,123.
Renton School District (PSE of Washington), Decision 1694 (PECB, 1983) - 08/15/1983
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeBy contrast, Elma School District (Elma Teachers Organization), Decision 1349 (EDUC, 1982) involved allegations of discrimination against a grievant because of her previous support of another labor organization.
-
1,124.
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) (ATU Local 587), Decision 1618 (PECB, 1983) - 04/15/1983
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeAs framed, the allegations of the complaint do not sufficiently indicate a claim that the employer interfered with, restrained or coerced the complainant in the exercise of his rights under RCW 41.56.040 or that it has discriminated against the complainant for his exercise of such rights, to form an opinion that the
-
1,125.
Boistfort School District, Decision 536 (EDUC, 1978) - 11/22/1978
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(a) Interfering with, restraining, coercing or discriminating against employees in their exercise of their right to self-organization as specified in RCW 41. 59. 060(1).