1,430 result(s)
-
1,076.
Port of Edmonds, Decision 378 (PORT, 1978) - 03/02/1978
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practiceand conditions of employment made by the employer immediately prior to and immediately after a representation election conducted by the Commission leading to the certification of the Complainant as the representative of the employees, by refusal to bargain, and discrimination against employees for their union activity.
-
1,077.
Clark Public Utilities, Decision 3815 (PECB, 1991) - 07/22/1991
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeNo public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining, or in the [...] (3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge; [...] A “derivative” violation of RCW 41.56.140(1) generally occurs when any of the other subsections of RCW 41.56.140 is violated, because interference with union affairs, discrimination for filing charges or a refusal to bargain inherently interferes with the right of public employees to organize and bargain collectively under
-
1,078.
King County, Decision 12879 (PECB, 2018) - 06/13/2018
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployees covered by Chapter 41.56 RCW have the right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for purposes of collective bargaining or exercise other rights under the chapter free from interference, restraint, coercion, or discrimination.
-
1,079.
Kelso School District (PSE of Washington), Decision 9744-A (PECB, 2007) - 09/12/2007
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFurthermore, Britt did not allege as part of her discrimination and hostile work environment claims that the employer acted in response to her exercise of union activity, rather she simply found the employer’s process and decision to be unfair.
-
1,080.
King County, Decision 8373 (PECB, 2004) - 03/01/2004
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn addition, the Commission does not have jurisdiction concerning reasonable accommodation for an injury or allegations of discrimination based on disability.
-
1,081.
City of Port Townsend, Decision 6351 (PECB, 1998) - 07/08/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn boxes provided on the complaint form to categorize alleged violations, Johnson has indicated “employer interference with employee rights” under RCW 41.56.140(1); “employer domination or assistance of union” under RCW 41.56.140 (2) ; “employer discrimination” under RCW 41.56.140(3); and employer refusal to bargain” under
-
1,082.
Clark County, Decision 5851 (PECB, 1997) - 02/26/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeBy interfering with employee rights and/or discrimination against employees for the use of the grievance procedure, inasmuch as discipline imposed concerning the same subject matter on May 30, 1996, was withdrawn by the employer as the result of a previous grievance.
-
1,083.
Columbia Basin College (Washington Public Employees Association), Decision 9210-A (PSRA, 2006) - 06/20/2006
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice• A union must treat all factions and segments of its membership without hostility or discrimination. [...] [6] Absent such allegations, the Executive Director dismissed that complaint alleging a union discriminated against a bargaining unit employee when it permitted only employees who have senior status the opportunity to vote on the proposed collective bargain ing agreement.
-
1,084.
City of Tacoma, Decision 6793 (PECB, 1999) - 08/17/1999
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeNo public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining, or in the [...] (3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge;
-
1,085.
Whatcom County, Decision 1886 (PECB, 1984) - 03/09/1984
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeAs to the facts, the respondent contends that since the employer resolved the complainant's grievance by conferring with the union without a formal grievance ever having to be filed, it shows that the county did not discriminate because of union activities. [...] Nevertheless, the employer's overall working relationship with the union on the balance, indicates Tureman's discharge lacked a union discrimination motive.
-
1,086.
Spokane School District v. Washington Education Association (573-F-76) - 11/22/1976
DECISIONS - Fact FindingThe parties have already agreed on a broad no-discrimination clause under which most, if not all of the types of past abuses alleged by the Association with respect to involuntary transfers could be grieved and arbitrated. [...] should give particular attention to the District's concerns that any imbalance in schedule revisions unfavorable to high school activities may generate future inequity claims by the high school teachers and also that any substantially disparate treatment of male and female activities may generate discrimination claims.
-
1,087.
Yakima County (Teamsters Local 760), Decision 13323 (PECB, 2021) - 03/18/2021
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeCity of Seattle (Seattle Police Officers’ Guild), Decision 11291-A. The Commission asserts jurisdiction in duty of fair representation cases when an employee alleges its union aligned itself in interest against employees it represents based on invidious discrimination.
-
1,088.
Intercity Transit (ATU Local 1765), Decision 12172 (PECB, 2014) - 10/01/2014
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeCity of Seattle (Seattle Police Officers’ Guild), Decision 11291-A. The Commission asserts jurisdiction in duty of fair representation cases when an employee alleges its union aligned itself in interest against employees it represents based on invidious discrimination.
-
1,089.
Seattle School District (Seattle Education Association), Decision 9700-A (EDUC, 2007) - 11/16/2007
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThus, the Commission would only exercise jurisdiction if the complaint alleged that the union aligned itself against the complainant on the basis of union membership or discriminated against her on some invidious basis.
-
1,090.
Clark Public Transportation Benefit Area (ATU Local 757), Decision 7087 (PECB, 2000) - 06/06/2000
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeUnion Breach of its duty of fair representation on and after July 1, 1999, in violation of RCW 41.56.150(1), by making proposals which benefit bargaining unit employees working full-time while discriminating against bargaining unit employees working part-time.
-
1,091.
Spokane County, Decision 6525 (PECB, 1998) - 12/23/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice4. In a fourth paragraph under the “Most Recent ULP Activity” title, the complaint alleges that the employer refused to bargain and “began to” discriminate against the members of the bargaining unit on January 9, 1998, by refusing to pay them a 2% pay increase granted to non-represented employees.
-
1,092.
Mary M. Knight School District, Decision 6384 (EDUC, 1998) - 08/12/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(b) To cause or attempt to cause an employer to discriminate against an employee in violation of subsection (1) (c) of this section;
-
1,093.
Washington State Ferries, MEC Decision 184 (1997) - 12/21/1997
MARINE EMPLOYEES COMMISSION - Marine Employees Commissionmanagement’s leaking his private medical information to co-workers in the fleet, in violation of WSF’s Code of Conduct, as well as other state and federal statutes; and 2) failure of WSF Human Resources Director, Jim Yearby, to investigate charges of discrimination and harassment brought to his attention by Mr. Separovich.
-
1,094.
City of Tukwila (Teamsters Local 763), Decision 5113-A (PECB, 1995) - 06/21/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeMcNeary was informed that employees can file charges alleging employer or union interference with employee rights, or alleging employer or union discrimination based on union activity.
-
1,095.
Clover Park School District (Clover Park Association of Classified Employees), Decision 3829 (PECB, 1991) - 07/29/1991
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe Commission has historically delineated two different types of “fair representation” situations, and has limited assertion of its jurisdiction to situations where a union is alleged to have engaged in invidious discrimination in its negotiation or administration of a collective bargaining agreement.
-
1,096.
Mason County, Decision 1745 (PECB, 1983) - 09/22/1983
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeWhile the Public Employment Relations Commission deals from time to time with discharge allegations, including the discharge of a probationary employee, the issue in such cases is whether the employee has been discriminated against for the exercise of collective bargaining rights protected by the statute.
-
1,097.
Seattle School District (International Union of Operating Engineers Local 302), Decision 13845 (PECB, 2024) - 05/16/2024
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe agency does not have authority to resolve all disputes that might arise in public employment, such as allegations that an employer discriminated against an employee because of a recognized disability.
-
1,098.
Pasco School District (Pasco Association of Educators), Decision 13842 (EDUC, 2024) - 05/14/2024
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe agency does not have authority to resolve all disputes that might arise in public employment, such as allegations that an employer discriminated against an employee because of a recognized disability.
-
1,099.
City of Bellingham, Decision 13267 (PECB, 2020) - 12/01/2020
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeA classic scenario occurs when a union induces the employer to discriminate against an employee based upon union membership.
-
1,100.
King County (King County Security Guild), Decision 13169 (PECB, 2020) - 03/17/2020
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeCity of Seattle (Seattle Police Officers’ Guild), Decision 11291-A. The Commission asserts jurisdiction in duty of fair representation cases when an employee alleges its union aligned itself in interest against employees it represents based on invidious discrimination.