1,430 result(s)
-
1,001.
Port of Seattle (ILWU Local 9), Decision 2661 (PECB, 1987) - 04/07/1987
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeGiving the complainant the benefit of the doubt, and assuming that he would amend the complaint to correct the obvious defect noted above, it appears that the complainant alleges that the employer has discriminated against him in reprisal for his successful prosecution of a complaint before the National Labor Relations
-
1,002.
City of Seattle, Decision 1355 (PECB, 1982) - 01/25/1982
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEven if the city has permitted misuse of its property and facilities in the past, any "discrimination" finding based thereon could not be remedied by an order compelling the city to permit an unconstitutional loan of its stationary, typewriters and copy machines to the complainant.
-
1,003.
Port of Seattle, Decision 10025 (PECB, 2008) - 03/27/2008
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer interference with employee rights and discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), by its termination of Virgie Armstrong Davis (Davis) in reprisal for union activities protected by Chapter 41.56 RCW.
-
1,004.
City of Kirkland (Washington State Council of County and City Employees), Decision 7200 (PECB, 2000) - 10/17/2000
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(union) had committed an “other unfair labor practice” violation by discriminating against Jensen, a non-member of the union, in failing to afford Jensen the following rights: 1) notice of union meetings; 2) ability to attend union meetings; and 3) materials distributed concerning collective bargaining negotiations.
-
1,005.
City of Pasco (OPEIU Local 11), Decision 2656-A (PECB, 1987) - 08/21/1987
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complainant first asserted that the union discriminated against herself and others who were required to make dues payments, by failing to uniformly enforce the union security provisions of a collective bargaining agreement in effect between the employer and the union within the six months prior to the filing of the
-
1,006.
City of Pasco (OPEIU Local 11), Decision 2656 (PECB, 1987) - 03/26/1987
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complainant first asserted that the union discriminated against herself and others who were required to make dues payments, by failing to uniformly enforce the union security provisions of a collective bargaining agreement in effect between the employer and the union within the six months prior to the filing of the
-
1,007.
Edmonds School District (Edmonds Association of Educational Assistants), Decision 2363 (PECB, 1986) - 01/23/1986
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeBy way of contrast, Elma School District (Elma Teachers Organization), Decision 1349 (PECB, 1982), involved allegations of discrimination against a grievant because of her previous support of another labor organization.
-
1,008.
Benton County, Decision 6035 (PECB, 1997) - 09/11/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practiceactions of: (1) Rejecting all of the union’s wage and benefit proposals based on a lack of funds and the Kinney study, and then (2) providing its unrepresented employees with a wage increase and improved benefits after the negotiations with the union had been completed, constituted discrimination against the union. [...] The feeling of discrimination among bargaining unit members was aggravated by the statements of Commissioner Max Benitz. [...] Specifically, the union accused the employer of interference with employee rights, domination, discrimination and refusal to bargain.
-
1,009.
City of Brier, Decision 11222 (PECB, 2011) - 11/09/2011
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer discrimination (and if so, derivative interference) in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), and employer refusal to bargain in violation of RCW 41.56.140(4) [and if so, derivative interference in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1)], by its actions concerning Pat Murphy (Murphy).
-
1,010.
Seattle School District, Decision 11177 (PECB, 2011) - 09/19/2011
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer discrimination (and if so, derivative interference) in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), by its failure to interview David Elkins (Elkins) for a General Foreperson position in reprisal for union activities protected Chapter 41.56 RCW.
-
1,011.
Eastern Washington University (Washington Federation of State Employees), Decision 10520 (PSRA, 2009) - 08/25/2009
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern union interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41.80.110(2)(a), discrimination in violation of RCW 41.80.110(2)(b), and refusal to bargain in violation of RCW 41.80.110(d), by its actions involving Kenneth Reidt (Reidt) and the custodial floor crew.
-
1,012.
Clark County, Decision 3200 (PECB, 1989) - 04/28/1989
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice3. While the complaint stated that grievances filed by other employees after the expiration of the contract had been processed, the complaint, as filed, fell short of suggesting that she had been discriminated against in the processing of her grievance.
-
1,013.
Clallam County, Decision 4011 (PECB, 1992) - 03/13/1992
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeAllegations that the discharge was unlawful discrimination, in violation of Chapter 41.56 RCW, are properly brought before the Public Employment Relations Commission. [...] The Standards for Decision in Discrimination Cases Where discrimination is alleged under RCW 41.56.140(1) or RCW 41.56.150(2), and the respondent defends that it had legitimate reasons for its action, the situation is evaluated under the “dual motivation” standard adopted by the Commission in City of Olympia, Decision [...] The union has sufficiently established a prima facie case showing an inference that union discrimination was a motivating factor in the scrutiny and subsequent discipline of Vanderhoof.
-
1,014.
City of Tacoma, Decision 12768 (PECB, 2017) - 08/28/2017
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicethe Public Employment Relations Commission (Commission).[1] A preliminary ruling was issued on April 5, 2017, which found that the complaint had stated a cause of action and the allegations related to employer discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1) and if so derivative inference in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1).
-
1,015.
Highline School District, Decision 11746 (PECB, 2013) - 05/07/2013
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer discrimination (and if so, derivative interference) in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), by actions toward Caldwell under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
-
1,016.
Shoreline Community College, Decision 10667-A (CCOL, 2010) - 06/17/2010
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn January 5, 2010, Russell D. Roscoe (Roscoe) filed an unfair labor practice complaint alleging that Shoreline Community College (employer) discriminated against him and interfered with his protected employee rights when it included his position in the employer’s Business Administration Reduction In Force Unit (RIF Unit).
-
1,017.
Douglas Grant Lincoln Okanogan Public Hospital District 6, Decision 10519 (PECB, 2009) - 08/26/2009
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer interference with employee rights and discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), by its termination of Debbie Schreibeis (Schreibeis), and "other" violations, described as retaliation.
-
1,018.
Seattle School District (Seattle Education Association), Decision 10073 (EDUC, 2008) - 05/14/2008
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn June 5, 2007, the Commission issued a preliminary ruling under WAC 391-45-110 finding that a cause of action existed on allegations of union interference with employee rights and union discrimination.
-
1,019.
State - Corrections, Decision 8772-A (PSRA, 2005) - 03/24/2005
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn October 6, 2004, a Preliminary Ruling was issued finding, in part, that claims made in the complaint alleging interference and discrimination violations would be subject to further proceedings.
-
1,020.
City of Seattle (Teamsters Local 117), Decision 6593 (PECB, 1999) - 02/03/1999
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe Commission does assert jurisdiction over “breach of duty of fair representation” complaints where a union is accused of aligning itself in interest against a bargaining unit employee because of some unlawful form of discrimination.
-
1,021.
Asotin Anatone School District, Decision 4394 (PECB, 1993) - 05/19/1993
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeA preliminary ruling letter directed to the parties on March 31, 1993,[1] noted that RCW 41.56.140(1) prohibits an employer from discharging or otherwise discriminating against public employees in retaliation for their efforts to organize or select a bargaining representative.
-
1,022.
City of Tacoma, Decision 4232 (PECB, 1992) - 11/12/1992
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe collective bargaining statute prohibits discrimination by an employer in reprisal for an employee having filed an unfair labor practice complaint under that statute, but that provision does not extend to the pursuit of claims outside of the collective bargaining process.
-
1,023.
City of Seattle, Decision 3339-A (PECB, 1990) - 03/27/1990
DECISIONS - ElectionThere is no indication of discrimination aimed at the complainant because of her previous union activity or for any other reason prohibited by law.
-
1,024.
Auburn School District (PSE of Washington), Decision 3369 (PECB, 1989) - 12/08/1989
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThere is no indication of discrimination aimed at the complainant because of her previous union activity or for any other reason prohibited by law.
-
1,025.
Mukilteo School District, Decision 2349 (EDUC, 1986) - 01/22/1986
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeAlthough the factual allegations fairly clearly recite what has happened, nothing among those facts suggests that anybody has interfered with, restrained, coerced or discriminated against the complainant in the exercise of his right to engage in (or decline to engage in) collective bargaining activities.