1,430 result(s)
-
976.
State - Social and Health Services (Washington Federation of State Employees), Decision 6010 (PECB, 1997) - 08/25/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicethat the Washington Federation of State Employees, Local 341 (union) had committed unfair labor practices pursuant to Chapter 41.56 RCW. Specifically, the complainant asserted that the union had interfered with his rights, and had discriminated against him, in the selection of another employee to fill a vacant position.
-
977.
City of Tukwila (Teamsters Local 763), Decision 5113 (PECB, 1995) - 05/12/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployees have standing to file charges alleging employer or union interference with employee rights, or alleging employer or union discrimination based on union activity, but those were not the allegations in these cases.
-
978.
Columbia School District, Decision 3613 (EDUC, 1990) - 10/19/1990
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice2. The Columbia School District shall not discriminate against employees on the basis of their union activity.
-
979.
Port of Pasco, Decision 3438 (PECB, 1990) - 03/08/1990
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeA preliminary ruling was issued pursuant to WAC 391-45-110 on June 21, 1989, finding that a cause of action existed for: "Interference and discrimination for having given testimony in proceedings before the Commission".
-
980.
Snohomish County (Snohomish County Corrections Guild), Decision 13807 (PECB, 2024) - 03/25/2024
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe duty of fair representation originated with United States Supreme Court decisions, holding that an exclusive bargaining representative has the duty to fairly represent all of those for whom it acts, without discrimination. [...] 1. The union must treat all factions and segments of its membership without hostility or discrimination.
-
981.
King County (Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587), Decision 12759 (PECB, 2017) - 08/03/2017
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice1. The union must treat all factions and segments of its membership without hostility or discrimination. [...] Brown did not prove that he was treated with hostility or discrimination by the union, that the union violated its duty of good faith and honesty in pursuing his grievance, or that the union engaged in arbitrary conduct.
-
982.
City of Seattle (Seattle Police Management Association), Decision 12091 (PECB, 2014) - 06/20/2014
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeCity of Seattle (Seattle Police Officers’ Guild), Decision 11291-A. The Commission asserts jurisdiction in duty of fair representation cases when an employee alleges its union aligned itself in interest against employees it represents based on invidious discrimination. [...] The continuing violation doctrine is sometimes used in state or federal employment discrimination cases to override the statute of limitations.
-
983.
King County (Washington State Nurses Association), Decision 10389-A (PECB, 2011) - 04/12/2011
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeRCW 41.56.150(3) makes it an unfair labor practice for an exclusive bargaining representative “to discriminate against an employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge.” Similarly, the NLRB has held that an exclusive bargaining representative may not discipline a union member for filing an unfair labor practice [...] RCW 41.56.150(3) prohibits a bargaining representative from discriminating against an employee who filed an unfair labor practice complaint against that representative.
-
984.
Western Washington University (Washington Public Employees Association Local 365), Decision 8849-B (PSRA, 2006) - 06/20/2006
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice• A union must treat all factions and segments of its membership without hostility or discrimination. [...] [9] Absent such allegations, the Executive Director dismissed that complaint alleging a union discriminated against a bargaining unit employee when it permitted only employees who have senior status the opportunity to vote on the proposed collective bargaining agreement.
-
985.
City of Bremerton, Decision 6006-A (PECB, 1998) - 01/20/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeArbitrators have no particular expertise in other issues, and the Commission does not defer any “representation”, “unit determination”, “interference”, “domination”, or “discrimination” allegations, or other types of “refusal to bargain” charges. [...] Attorney’s fees were found necessary in that case to be sure the employer had received the message that discrimination in retaliation for union activity and testimony before the Commission would not be tolerated.
-
986.
Seattle School District, Decision 5733-A (PECB, 1997) - 09/16/1997
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practicea. Interfering and discriminating against, restraining or coercing employees in the exercise of their collective bargaining rights under the laws of the State of Washington, by refusing to bargain collectively with the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 609, on hours of work of food service employees at [...] b. In any other manner interfering with, discriminating against, restraining or coercing the employees in the exercise of their collective bargaining rights secured by the laws of Washington.
-
987.
State - Washington State Patrol, Decision 4710 (PECB, 1994) - 06/09/1994
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn City of Seattle, supra, the union had filed a contract violation grievance, and then filed a second grievance claiming the employer had discriminated against the grievant because of the first grievance. [...] The employer refused to provide the report, citing that the union was litigating the discrimination claim both in arbitration and in court.
-
988.
City of Pasco, Decision 3804 (PECB, 1991) - 06/13/1991
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeRCW 41.56.040 specifically prohibits a public employer from interfering with or discriminating against a public employee in the exercise of their rights under the Public Employees’ Collective Bargaining Act. The filing and processing of grievances through contractual grievance procedures is an activity protected by Chapter [...] Furthermore, the Commission does not defer “interference” or “discrimination” charges to arbitrators.
-
989.
Port of Pasco, Decision 3398 (PECB, 1990) - 01/23/1990
DECISIONS - Electiondiscriminated against in his employment by the Port of Pasco, in reprisal for his testimony given in the hearing on the unfair labor practice charges initiated concerning Lingle.[3] On August 28, 1989, Art Glasow filed a complaint charging unfair labor practices with the Commission, alleging that he had been discriminated
-
990.
Seattle Public Health Hospital (AFGE Local 1170), Decision 1781-A (PECB, 1984) - 07/12/1984
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe Washington State Supreme Court has held that public employee unions have a duty to fairly represent the interests of all their members without discrimination. [...] 7. On December 14, 1983, Sullivan filed an unfair labor practice complaint against the employer, alleging discrimination and reprisal against the complainant for his engaging in protected union activities under Chapter 41.56 RCW.
-
991.
Shelton School District v. Washington Education Association (761-F-77) - 06/30/1978
DECISIONS - Fact Finding(Non-Discrimination Clause): Adopt the District's proposal except for the Affirmative Action Plan. [...] The employer agrees it will not discriminate against any employee because of membership in the Association, because of participation in any representative activity on behalf of the Association, because of any action taken within the established grievance procedure or otherwise with respect to any terms or conditions of
-
992.
Franklin County, Decision 7389 (PECB, 2001) - 05/07/2001
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe Executive Director issued a preliminary ruling under WAC 391-45-110, on August 11, 1999, finding a cause of action to exist on allegations that the employer had discriminated against Corporal Bill Corbett in retaliation for his having engaged in union activities.
-
993.
Kennewick School District, Decision 6370 (PECB, 1998) - 07/15/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeSpecifically, Davis alleged that the employer had interfered with her exercise of collective bargaining rights, and discriminated against her, by targeting her for criticism, ignoring its own procedure for processing parent complaints, and conducting an unreasonable investigation into her activities.
-
994.
Wenatchee School District, Decision 5258-A (PECB, 1996) - 04/09/1996
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe employer was directed to file and serve its answer to allegations that were found to state a cause of action, including that the employer interfered with Powers' protected union activity, by discriminating against her in subsequent assignments and "harassing' her.
-
995.
Stevens County, Decision 4052 (PECB, 1992) - 04/28/1992
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complainant is unrepresented and, absent any allegation of antiunion discrimination, the complainant was informed that her allegations did not appear to state a cause of action.
-
996.
Port of Seattle (ILWU Local 9), Decision 3887 (PECB, 1991) - 10/09/1991
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIn order to pursue a “discrimination” unfair labor practice case, the employee who files a complaint with the Commission must have been harmed by the alleged unlawful conduct on the part of the employer and/or union.
-
997.
City of Puyallup, Decision 2902 (PECB, 1988) - 04/01/1988
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFurther, the complainant was advised that the Public Employment Relations Commission has jurisdiction only over matters concerning collective bargaining, whereas the complaint appears to allege only that the respondent had discriminated against the complainant because of his race.
-
998.
Bremerton Housing Authority (Teamsters Local 58), Decision 2762 (PECB, 1987) - 09/02/1987
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe Commission processes duty of fair representation cases involving discrimination in the collective bargaining process.
-
999.
Shoreline School District (SEIU Local 6), Decision 5560-A (PECB, 1996) - 09/11/1996
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(1) Employer interference and discrimination, by colluding with SEIU Local 6 to inappropriately exclude the dispatch supervisor from the bargaining unit, and by discharging Toni Dell-Imagine because she refused to make work assignments based on employees’ union activities; and [...] See, also, Pe Ell School District, Decision 3801-A (EDUC, 1992), where a bargaining unit member failed to make a prima facie case of discrimination when he could not prove an improper motivation behind the union’s action that harmed him. [...] 3. Toni Dell-Imagine has failed to establish a prima facie case that Service Employees International Union, Local 6, violated RCW 41.56.150(2) by inducing, or attempting to induce, Shoreline School District to discriminate against Toni Dell-Imagine.
-
1,000.
Zips, Decision 8493 (PRIV, 2004) - 04/05/2004
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations of the complaint concern employer interference with employee rights and discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), by shift manager Mike Laughlin’s yelling behavior towards Mullaley, a former employee.