1,430 result(s)
-
726.
Washington State Ferries, MEC Decision 210 (1999) - 03/11/1999
MARINE EMPLOYEES COMMISSION - Marine Employees CommissionMr. Langvold charged WSF with discharging or otherwise discriminating against an employee after employee has filed charges or has given testimony concerning subjects covered by chapter 47.64 RCW. [...] ... (d) To discharge or otherwise discriminate against an employee because he has filed charges or given testimony under this chapter.
-
727.
Bremerton School District, Decision 6188 (PECB, 1998) - 01/23/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe Commission does determine allegations of discrimination related to union activities, but the only discrimination suggested in this complaint is “sexual harassment”, which would have to be processed before the Human Rights Commission or appropriate federal authorities.
-
728.
Shohomish Transit, Decision 570 (PECB, 1979) - 01/16/1979
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIt is an unfair labor practice to discriminate against employees for their exercise of the rights conferred by RCW 41.56, but in this case there are no allegations of such discrimination.Nothing contained in RCW 41.56 provides protection from discharge while unable to work due to illness, and any such right would have to
-
729.
Kitsap County, Decision 8402-A (PECB, 2005) - 03/28/2005
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeOn June 10, 2003, the Kitsap County Deputy Sheriff’s Guild (union) filed a complaint with the Public Employment Relations Commission charging Kitsap County (employer) with unfair labor practices under RCW 41.56.140(1) and (4) alleging discrimination, interference with employee rights and the refusal to bargain. [...] On January 9, 2004, a Deficiency Notice was issued regarding the discrimination allegation giving the union an opportunity to amend the complaint. [...] Receiving no response from the union, a decision was issued on February 13, 2004, dismissing the discrimination allegation and ordering further proceedings on the claims of interference and the refusal to bargain.
-
730.
City of Pasco, Decision 4860-A (PECB, 1995) - 09/14/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeSecond, Wicklander moved on the third day of hearing to add the union as a respondent in his case against the employer.[5]Wicklander based his motion on his allegation that Johnston's notes of the June 23, 1993 interviews were new evidence of union discrimination unavailable to him when the separate complaint against the [...] The conversations could not be considered violations because they occurred more than six months before the unfair labor practice complaint was filed, but they were evidence of union animus supporting discrimination violations. [...] The complaint against the union was dismissed because the statement of facts had not been detailed enough to state a cause of action for collusion with the employer or for union discrimination.
-
731.
Pierce Fire District 2, Decision 4307 (PECB, 1993) - 04/07/1993
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeFinally, Hill asserts that the union harassed her and discriminated against her, because she paid her union dues by hand, and because she filed an unfair labor practice complaint against the union when it did not provide her with a copy of the contract for the fire fighter bargaining unit. [...] The employer argues that Hill never introduced evidence of discrimination, so that the claim against the employer should be dismissed. [...] The Commission will assert jurisdiction to police its certifications where a union is alleged to have engaged in invidious discrimination against a bargaining unit employee, or otherwise aligned itself in interest against an employee it has a duty to represent.[11] On the other hand, the Commission does not assert
-
732.
State - Corrections (Teamsters Local 117), Decision 10612 (PSRA, 2009) - 12/01/2009
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe amended complaint added charges against the employer for interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(a), domination or assistance of a union in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(b), discrimination in violation of RCW 41.80.110(1)(c), and discrimination for filing charges in violation of RCW
-
733.
City of Everett (WSCCCE), Decision 7339 (PECB, 2001) - 03/27/2001
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complaint charging unfair labor practices in the above-referenced matter was filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission by Marliss Olson (Olson) on July 5, 2000.The allegations of the complaint concern union interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41.56.150(1), discrimination for filing an [...] A violation concerning discrimination for filing unfair labor practice charges cannot stand absent evidence that the complainant has previously filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the Commission.
-
734.
City of Everett (Washington State Council of County and City Employees), Decision 7338 (PECB, 2001) - 03/27/2001
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe complaint charging unfair labor practices in the above-referenced matter was filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission by Deborah Noble (Noble) on July 5, 2000.The allegations of the complaint concern union interference with employee rights in violation of RCW 41.56.150(1), discrimination for filing an [...] A violation concerning discrimination for filing unfair labor practice charges cannot stand absent evidence that the complainant has previously filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the Commission.
-
735.
Community Transit, Decision 5256 (PECB, 1995) - 09/11/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice3. To the extent that Branley was claiming discrimination against him on the basis of his age, the Public Employment Relations Commission does not have jurisdiction to hear or determine such allegations. [...] Age discrimination claims are processed by the Washington State Human Rights Commission.
-
736.
Mukilteo School District, Decision 5101 (PECB, 1995) - 05/12/1995
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeDiscrimination allegations unrelated to the collective bargaining process do not state a cause of action. [...] Decision 1355 (PECB, 1982), where the subject of the alleged discrimination was an order that the employee cease using the employer's property and equipment for personal use.
-
737.
City of Lacey (Lacey Police Officers Guild), Decision 754 (PECB, 1979) - 10/30/1979
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeRCW 41.56. 030 and Article I of Guild contract covers discrimination in employment. [...] The grievance filing evidently followed the change of the wage rate, and there is no suggestion that there has been any reprisal or discrimination against O’Roke because of the filing of the grievance.
-
738.
City of Federal Way (WSCCCE), Decision 5183-A (PECB, 1996) - 02/15/1996
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice(3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge; [...] To make out a prima facie case, a complainant claiming unlawful discrimination needs to show: [...] 1. Interfering with or discriminating against Matthew Bodhaine for his exercise of his collective bargaining rights under Chapter 41.56 RCW.
-
739.
Port of Longview (ILWU Local 21), Decision 9393-A (PECB, 2006) - 12/08/2006
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeTimothy Milligan (complainant) filed a complaint charging unfair labor practices with the Public Employment Relations Commission against the Port of Longview (employer).[1] A preliminary ruling issued July 14, 2006, found that claims made in alleging interference and discrimination violations would be subject to further [...] The charge against the employer involved one factual claim: The employer interfered with and discriminated against the employee, by terminating his employment, in reprisal for union activities.
-
740.
Grays Harbor County, Decision 7239 (PECB, 2000) - 12/14/2000
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe allegations concern: (1) Interference with employee rights; (2) Discrimination; and (3) Domination or assistance of union. [...] Employer interference with employee rights and discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.-140(1), by reducing overtime opportunities for sign technicians Ken Jacobson and Steve Brumfield in reprisal for their union activities protected by Chapter 41.56 RCW.
-
741.
Republic School District (PSE of Republic), Decision 3463 (PECB, 1990) - 04/09/1990
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe internal affairs of unions are not regulated by the statute, except where there is allegation that the union has engaged in discrimination of one or more of the traditional unlawful forms (e.g., race, creed, sex, national origin, etc.), or where there is allegation that the union has discriminated because of an
-
742.
Vancouver Housing Authority (OPEIU Local 11), Decision 2177 (PECB, 1985) - 02/28/1985
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeThe Commission will assert its jurisdiction with respect to breach of duty of fair representation claims where the allegations involve discrimination against the grievant because of her previous support of another labor organization. [...] There is no allegation that the complainant was discriminated against on any unlawful basis.
-
743.
Lewis County, Decision 464 (PECB, 1978) - 06/27/1978
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeIt has long been clear that an employer and a bargaining representative may not lawfully agree to wages, hours or working conditions which encourage or discourage union membership by discrimination on the basis of union membership or lack thereof. [...] There is no claim or admission by the employer that it has become a party to a discriminatory practice, nor even an allegation that it has been confronted in collective bargaining with a proposal which discriminates on the basis of union membership.
-
744.
City of Seattle (Teamsters Local 763), Decision 3872-A (PECB, 1992) - 11/19/1992
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeGeorgianne Browning contends that Local 763 has unlawfully discriminated against her in the method of collection of dues and reinitiation fees; that union members cannot be required to pay union dues during a contract hiatus; and that the union did not give her proper notification of the amounts of monies owed to the union [...] Local 763 contends that it has not discriminated against Browning in calculating the amounts of dues, reinitiation fees, or assessments. [...] 2. Georgianne Browning has not sustained her burden of proof with regards to the allegation that the union has discriminated and retaliated against her, in violation of RCW 41.56.150(1), with regards to the manner the union has assessed a “reinitiation fee” in August of 1990.
-
745.
Washington State Ferries, MEC Decision 572 (2009) - 12/08/2009
MARINE EMPLOYEES COMMISSION - Marine Employees CommissionRULE 5 – NON-DISCRIMINATION 5.01 The parties will not discriminate against any employee for activity, or lack thereof, on behalf of or membership in the Union. [...] Neither the Employer nor the Union will discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, sex, age, color, or national origin, in a manner which is in violation of applicable state or federal laws.
-
746.
King County, Decision 6063-A (PECB, 1998) - 04/21/1998
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeNo public employer, or other person, shall directly or indirectly, interfere with, restrain, coerce, or discriminate against any public employee or group of public employees in the free exercise of their right to organize and designate representatives of their own choosing for the purpose of collective bargaining, or in the [...] (3) To discriminate against a public employee who has filed an unfair labor practice charge; [...] Specifically, it is entitled to file and prosecute unfair labor practice charges on “interference” or “discrimination” claims under RCW 41.56.140(1), affecting employees in the petitioned-for bargaining unit.
-
747.
City of Seattle, Decision 3470 (PECB, 1990) - 04/13/1990
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor Practice[T]he exclusive agent's statutory authority to represent all members of a designated unit includes a statutory obligation to serve the interest of all members without hostility or discrimination toward any, to exercise its discretion with complete good faith and honesty, and to avoid arbitrary conduct. ... [...] (3) Absence of allegation that the complainant or any of the other employees whose positions were eliminated from the communications center have been or will be discriminated against on account of any of the traditional bases for invidious discrimination (race, creed, sex, national origin, etc.) or because of their union
-
748.
Auburn School District, Decision 2291 (PECB, 1985) - 09/05/1985
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeAnalysis now shifts to respondent's defenses to the alleged discrimination. [...] If respondent can rebut the discrimination allegations on the basis of practical business necessity, an unfair labor practice cannot be found. [...] B. In any other manner interfering with or discriminating against public employees in the exercise of rights protected by Chapter 41.56 RCW.
-
749.
King County, Decision 13590 (PECB, 2022) - 11/08/2022
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployer religious discrimination. The complaint is dismissed. The complaint does not includes facts alleging a violation within the Commission’s jurisdiction. [...] Based on the information in the email, the complainant is attempting to file an unfair labor practice for religious discrimination.
-
750.
Clark County, Decision 9080 (PECB, 2005) - 09/14/2005
DECISIONS - Unfair Labor PracticeEmployer interference with employee rights and discrimination in violation of RCW 41.56.140(1), domination or assistance of a union in violation of RCW 41.56.140(2), and refusal to bargain in violation of RCW 41.56.140(4), by breach of its good faith bargaining obligations in implementing changes in terms and conditions of [...] Although the employer is correct that a charge of unilateral change in the terms and conditions of employment is part of the union’s allegations, it is only one part out of a total of four allegations which also include: interference, domination and discrimination.