SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN Justice JOEL L. AMAKER, SR. Petitioner, - v OFFICE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND BOARD OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, Respondents. The following papers, numbered 1 to were read on this motion to/for Notice of Motion/ Order to Show Cause - Affidavits - Exhibits ... Answering Affidavits - Exhibits Replying Affidavits Cross-Motion: GYes G No Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion is denied, for the reasons set forth below After reading the papers and after oral argument held on the record, the petitioner failed to make this motion to reargue the court's 5/6/99 decision within 30 days of the motion of entry date 7/30/99 and served on 7/31/99. Foley v Roche 86 A.D.2d 887 2nd Dep't 1982). The court also finds that Petitioner failed to bring forth new facts which the court did not consider in its 5/6/99 decision. This constitutes the decision and order of the Court. Dated: 10/6/99 Check one: GFINAL DISPOSITIONGNON-FINAL DISPOSITIONPART 21 INDEX NO. 400217/99 MOTION DATE 9/28/99 MOTION SEQ. NO. 003 MOTION CAL. NO. 001 * PAPERS NUMBERED * * 1 * * 2 * * J. S. C.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.