BOARD OF CERTIFICATION

Decision Information

Decision Content

LOCAL 1115, EMPLOYEES UNION, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT UNIONS V. WILLIAMSBURGH COMMUNITY CORPORATION, 8 OCB 22A (BOC 1971) [Decision No. 22A-71 (Cert.)] OFFICE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BOARD OF CERTIFICATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x In the Matter of LOCAL 1115, EMPLOYEES UNION, NATIONAL DECISION NO 22A-71 FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT UNIONS DOCKET NO. RU-117-69 -and-WILLIAMSBURGH COMMUNITY CORPORATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND ORDER On March 22, 1971, the Board issued its Decision and Order in this case (Decision No. 22-71), dismissing the representation petition of Local 1115, Employees Union, NFIU, on the ground that it had requested an inappropriate unit. Since that time, it has come to the Board's attention, and the Board takes administrative notice, that there is an outstanding certification issued on December 29, 1966, by the Department of Labor (8 NYCDL 164). The last collective bargaining agreement covering employees in the prior certification was entered into between District Council 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, and the Council Against Poverty of the Human Resources Administration. That contract expired on September 30, 1969, and no new agreement has been concluded. The certification previously issued should be terminated for the reason that it is inconsistent with our finding in Decision No. 22-71 that the appropriate unit should be City-wide in scope, and that a unit less compre hensive would serve to encourage the fragmenting of units contrary to Board policy as stated in New York City Local 246, SEIU- AFL-CIO, Decision No. 45-69.
DECISION NO. 22A-71 Docket No. RU-117-69 2 0 R D E R Pursuant to the powers vested in the Board of Certification by the New York City Collective Bargaining Law, it is hereby 0 R D E R E D , that Certification No. 8 NYCDL 164 be, and the same hereby is, terminated. DATED: New York, N.Y. April 12, 1971, ARVID ANDERSON C h a i r m a n ERIC J. SCHMERTZ M e m b e r
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.