DC37, et. al v. City, Related Public Employers,42 OCB 2 (BOC 1988) [2-88 (Amend. Cert.)] OFFICE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BOARD OF CERTIFICATION ---------------------------------- x In the Matter of DISTRICT COUNCIL 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO; CITY EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 237, I.B.T.; and LOCAL 144, DECISION NO. 2-88 HOTEL, HOSPITAL, NURSING HOME AND ALLIED HEALTH SERVICES UNION, S.E.I.U, AFL-CIO; jointly DOCKET NO. RU-1000-88 -and-THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND RELATED PUBLIC EMPLOYERS ---------------------------------- x ORDER AMENDING CERTIFICATION The parties hereto having agreed, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Board, that the new title of Licensed Barber (Correction) should be substituted for the obsolete title of Licensed Barber 1 in Certification No. 62D-75 (as amended), covering various medical, hospital and laboratory technicians, and held by the three captioned Unions; NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the powers vested in 1 As classified by the City's Department of Personnel. The title of Licensed Barber in the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation continues to exist and is not affected by this decision.
Decision No. 2-88 2 Docket No. RU-1000-88 the Board of Certification by the New York City Collective Bargaining Law, it is hereby ORDERED that Certification No. 62D-75 (as previously amended) be, and the same hereby is, further amended by substituting the title of Licensed Barber (Correction) for the City-classified title of Licensed Barber, 2 subject to existing contracts, if any. DATED: New York, N.Y. April 21, 1988 MALCOLM D. MAC DONALD CHAIRMAN GEORGE NICOLAU MEMBER DANIEL G. COLLINS MEMBER 2 See Appendix.
Decision No. 2-88 3 Docket No. RU-1000-88 A P P E N D I X The titles and title code numbers of the employees affected by this decision are as follows: Title Added to Certification No. 62D-75 Licensed Barber (Correction) 90116 Title Deleted from Certification No. 62D-75 Licensed Barber 90115 Related Title Retained in Certification No. 62D-75 Licensed Barber [in HHC] 901140
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.