BOARD OF CERTIFICATION

Decision Information

Decision Content

DC37 v. City, Related Public Employers,38 OCB 3 (BOC 1986) [3-86 (Cert.)] OFFICE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BOARD OF CERTIFICATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X In the Matter of DISTRICT COUNCIL 37, AFSCME, DECISION NO. 3-86 AFL-CIO -and-DOCKET NO. RU-956-86 THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND RELATED PUBLIC EMPLOYERS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X DECISION AND ORDER On March 27, 1986, District Council 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, filed its motion herein, pursuant to ยง2.19 of the Revised Consolidated Rules of the Office of Collective Bargaining, to substitute the title of City Laborer for that of Laborer in Certification CWR-17/67 (as amended by Decision No. 7-82). The City's Office of Municipal Labor Relations, in a letter dated April 21, 1986, states that it does not oppose this motion. Our investigation shows that, although certain Laborers are to have their title changed to City Laborer, the title of Laborer is to be retained "for present permanent incumbents only", of whom there are many. Accordingly, in order not to deprive these employees of union representation, we shall not delete their title until it becomes vacant.
Decision No. 3-86 Docket No. RU-956-86 2. 0 R D E R NOW, THEREFORE,, pursuant to the powers vested in the Board of Certification by the New York City Collective Bargaining Law, it is hereby ORDERED that Certification CWR-17/67 (as previously amended) be, and the same hereby is, further amended to include the title of City Laborer, subject to existing contracts, if any; and it is further ORDERED that the title of Laborer be deleted from the cited Certification when it becomes vacant. DATED: New York, N.Y. May 20, 1986 ARVID ANDERSON CHAIRMAN DANIEL G. COLLINS MEMBER MILTON FRIEDMAN MEMBER
Decision No. 3-86 Docket No. RU-956-86 The titles and title code numbers of the employees affected by this decision are as follows: ADDED TITLE City Laborer 90702 TITLE TO BE DELETED WHEN VACANT Laborer 90753
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.