DC37 v. City, 22 OCB 12 (BOC 1978) [Decision No. 12-78 (Amend. Cert.)] OFFICE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BOARD OF CERTIFICATION -----------------------------------X In the Matter of DECISION NO. 12-78 DISTRICT COUNCIL 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO DOCKET NO. RU-643-78 -and-THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND RELATED PUBLIC EMPLOYERS ------------------------------------X ORDER AMENDING CERTIFICATION The parties hereto having agreed, and it appearing to the satisfaction of the Board that the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) titles listed below should be added, by accretion, to the following indicated certifications: Certification No. And Unit CETATitle. 46A-75 (as amended) Human Rights Specialist various social service and (CETA) related titles, including Human Rights Specialist 46D-75 (as amended) Assistant Retirement various accounting, statistical Benefit Examiner (CETA) and related titles, including Assistant Retirement Benefits Examiner 46F-75 (as amended) Patient Care Review various health services titles, Analyst (CETA) including Medical Utilization Review Analyst 461-75 (as amended) Park Maintainer (CETA) various parks and public works titles, including Associate Park Service Worker
Decision No. 12-78 2 Docket No. RU-643-78
Decision No. 12-78 3 Docket No. RU-643-78 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the powers vested in the Board of Certification by the New York City Collective Bargaining Law, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-named certifications be, and the same hereby are further amended to include the indicated Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) titles, subject to existing contracts if any. DATED: New York, N.Y. April 21, 1978 ARVID ANDERSON Chairman WALTER L. EISENBERG Member ERIC J. SCHMERTZ Member
Decision No. 12-78 Docket No. RU-643-78 The titles and title code numbers of the employees affected by this decision are as follows: Human Rights Specialist (CETA) 09770 Assistant Retirement Benefits Examiner (CETA) 09756 Patient Care Review Analyst (CETA) 00266 Park Maintainer (CETA) 09751
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.