City v. L.1070, DC37, et. Al, 12 OCB 34 (BOC 1973) [Decision No. 34-73 (Cert.)] OFFICE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BOARD OF CERTIFICATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X In the Matter of THE CITY OF NEW YORK -and-DECISION NO. 34-73 THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE DOCKET NO. RE-31-73 STATE OF NEW YORK -and-LOCAL 1070, DISTRICT COUNCIL 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X DECISION AND ORDER REVOKING CERTIFICATION The Office of Labor Relations, by letter dated February 20, 1973, requested this Board to revoke the certification (Decision No. 31-68) covering the titles of Law and Equity Clerk, Head Clerk (Law and Equity), and Chief Clerk (Law and Equity), which is held by Local 1070, D.C. 37, AFSCME, on the ground that said titles "no longer exist." The Office of Labor Relations further stated that these titles "were limited to present incumbents only by the Administrative Board of the Judicial Conference. There are no incumbents ... and there will be no prospective incumbents in these titles."
Decision No.34-73 Docket No. RE-31-73 2. Our investigation confirms this and shows, in addition, that these titles have been vacant for more than three years and that they have been deleted from the classification of the Judicial Conference. The Union, by letter dated March 5, 1973, stated that it does not object to the request of the Office of Labor Relations. 0 R D E R Pursuant to the authority vested in the Board of Certification, it is hereby ordered that Certification No. 31-68, covering the titles of Law and Equity Clerk, Head Clerk (Law and Equity), and Chief Clerk (Law and Equity), be, and the same hereby is, revoked. DATED: New York, New York April 3, 1973 ARVID ANDERSON CHAIRMAN WALTER L. EISENBERG MEMBER ERIC J. SCHMERTZ MEMBER
Decision No. 34-73 Docket No. RE-31-73 The code numbers of the titles affected by this decision are as follows: Chief Clerk (Law and Equity) 08611 Head Clerk (Law and Equity) 08622 Law and Equity Clerk 08628
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.