Davis v. L.237, IBT & NYCHA, 53 OCB 6 (BCB 1994) [Decision No. B-6-94 (ES)] OFFICE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BOARD OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING -------------------------------------- X In the Matter of the Improper Practice Proceeding -between-DECISION NO. B-6-94 (ES) WILLIE DAVIS, DOCKET NO. BCB-1625-93 Petitioner, -and-LOCAL 237, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS AND THE NYC HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondents. -------------------------------------- X DETERMINATION OF EXECUTIVE SECRETARY On December 20, 1993, Willie Davis ("Petitioner") filed a verified improper practice petition against Local 237 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the New York City Housing Authority ("Respondents"), in which he alleged that he had been unjustly terminated in violation of the New York City Collective Bargaining Law (“NYCCBL”). In his improper practice petition, Petitioner alleges as follows: With respect to [the] matter of the unjust termination of [Petitioner], ... Petitioner request(s) a hearing[, immediate] reinstatement and that he be made [whole]. Pursuant to Title 61, Section 1-07 (d) of the Rules of the City of New York (formerly Section 7.4 of the Revised Consolidated Rules of the Office of Collective Bargaining), a copy of which is annexed hereto, the undersigned has reviewed the petition and has determined that the improper practice claim asserted therein must be dismissed because it does not allege facts sufficient as a
DECISION NO. B-6-94 (ES) 2 DOCKET NO. BCB-1625-93 matter of law to constitute an improper practice within the meaning of the NYCCBL. The NYCCBL does not provide a remedy for every perceived wrong or inequity. Its provisions and procedures are designed to safeguard the rights of public employees set forth therein, i.e., the right to bargain collectively through certified public employee organizations; the right to organize, form, join, and assist public employee organizations; and the right to refrain from such activities. Petitioner has failed to allege any facts in support of his claim that Respondents violated §12-306 of the NYCCBL, 1 which 1 Section 12-306a of the NYCCBL provides as follows: Improper public employer practices. It shall be an improper practice for a public employer or its agents: (1) to interfere with, restrain or coerce public employees in the exercise of their rights granted in §12-305 of this chapter; (2) to dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any public employee organization; (3) to discriminate against any employee for the purpose of encouraging or discouraging membership in, or participation in the activities of, any public employee organization; (4) to refuse to bargain collectively in good faith on matters within the scope of collective bargaining with certified or designated representatives of its public employees. Section 12-306b of the NYCCBL provides as follows: Improper public employee organization practices. it shall be an improper practice for a public employee organization or its agents: (1) to interfere with, restrain or coerce public employees in the exercise of rights granted in section 12-305 of this chapter, or to cause, or attempt to cause, a public employer to do so; (2) to refuse to bargain collectively in good faith with a public employer on matters within the scope of collective bargaining ....
DECISION NO. B-6-94 (ES) 3 DOCKET NO. BCB-1625-93 define improper practices. Since the instant petition does not allege that Respondents' actions were intended to, or did, affect any rights protected under the NYCCBL, it must be dismissed. I note, however, that dismissal of the petition is without prejudice to any rights the Petitioner may have in another forum. Dated: New York, New York April 4, 1994 Loren Krause Luzmore Executive Secretary Board of Collective Bargaining
TITLE 61 OF THE RULES OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK (FORMERLY REFERRED TO AS THE REVISED CONSOLIDATED RULES OF THE OFFICE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING) Section 1-07(d) (formerly § 7.4) Improper Practices. A petition alleging that a public employer or its agents or a public employee organization or its agents has engaged in or is engaging in an improper practice in violation of Section 12-306 (formerly 1173-4.2) of the statute may be filed with the Board within four (4) months thereof by one (1) or more public employees or any public employee organization acting in their behalf or by a public employer together with a request to the Board for a final determination of the matter and for an appropriate remedial order. Within ten (10) days after a petition alleging improper practice is filed, the Executive Secretary shall review the allegations thereof to determine whether the facts as alleged may constitute an improper practice as set forth in section 12-306 (formerly 1173-4.2) of the statute. If it is determined that the petition, on its face, does not contain facts sufficient as a matter of law constitute a violation, or that the alleged violation occurred more than four (4) months prior to the filing of the charge, it shall be dismissed by the Executive Secretary and copies of such determination shall be served upon the parties by certified mail. If, upon such review, the Executive Secretary shall determine that the petition is not, on its face, untimely or insufficient, notice of the determination shall be served on the parties by certified mail, provided, however, that such determination shall not constitute a bar to the assertion by respondent of defenses or challenges to the petition based upon allegations of untimeliness or insufficiency and supported by probative evidence available to the respondent. Within ten (10) days after receipt of a decision of the Executive Secretary dismissing an improper practice petition as provided in this subdivision, the petitioner may file with the Board of Collective Bargaining an original and three (3) copies of a statement in writing setting forth an appeal from the decision together with proof of service thereof upon all other parties. The statement shall set forth the reasons for the appeal. Section 1-07(h) (formerly § 7.8) Answer - Service and Filing. Within ten (10) days after service of the petition, or, where the petition contains allegations of improper practice, within ten (10) days of the receipt of notice of finding by the Executive Secretary, pursuant to Title 61, Section 1-07(d) of the Rules of The City of New York (formerly Rule 7.4), that the petition is not, on its face, untimely or insufficient, respondent shall serve and file its answer upon the petitioner and any other party respondent, and shall file the original and three (3) copies thereof, with proof of service, with the Board. Where special circumstances exist that warrant an expedited determination, it shall be within the discretionary authority of the Director to order respondent to serve and file its answer within less than ten (10) days. OTHER SECTIONS OF THE LAW AND RULES MAY BE APPLICABLE. CONSULT THE COMPLETE TEXT 7/92
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.