Youth Justice Court

Decision Information

Decision information:

Abstract: Transcript of an Excerpt from Proceedings (Ruling re Reverse Onus Show Cause)

Decision Content





                                                    Y-1-YO-2007-000094

              IN THE YOUTH JUSTICE COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES

              IN THE MATTER OF:





                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



                                          - v -



                                          S.K.

                                   (A Young Person)







              Transcript of an Excerpt from Proceedings (Ruling re

              Reverse Onus Show Cause) heard before The Honourable

              Judge R.D. Gorin, in Yellowknife, in the Northwest

              Territories, on the 6th day of June, A.D. 2007.







              APPEARANCES:

              Ms. S. Smallwood:     Counsel on behalf of the Crown

              Mr. P. Falvo:         Counsel on behalf of the Young Person



                       -------------------------------------

                     Charges under ss. 145(5) C.C. and 334(b) C.C.





         1      (EXCERPT FROM PROCEEDINGS - RULING RE REVERSE ONUS

         2      SHOW CAUSE, YOUTH JUSTICE COURT)

         3

         4      THE COURT:             Mr. K., a young person, is

         5          charged with theft contrary to section 334(b) of

         6          the Criminal Code and failing to attend court

         7          contrary to subsection 145(5) of the Criminal

         8          Code.  Given that one of the charges is under

         9          section 145(5), if this were in an adult court,

        10          the applicability of sections 515(6) and 515(10)

        11          of the Criminal Code would be very clear.

        12          Section 515(6)(c) of the Criminal Code provides

        13          that:

        14               Notwithstanding any provision of

        15               this section, where an accused is

        16               charged ...

        17               (c)  with an offence under any of

        18               subsections 145(2) to (5) that is

        19               alleged to have been committed while

        20               he was at large after being released

        21               in respect of another offence

        22               pursuant to the provisions of this

        23               Part ... the justice shall order

        24               that the accused be detained in

        25               custody until he is dealt with

        26               according to law, unless the

        27               accused, having been given a






       Official Court Reporters
                                        1





         1               reasonable opportunity to do so,

         2               shows cause why his detention in

         3               custody is not justified, but where

         4               the justice orders that the accused

         5               be released, he shall include in the

         6               record a statement of his reasons

         7               for making the order.

         8               Subsection (10) deals with the grounds that

         9          the court is required to consider, and were this

        10          matter in adult court the accused would have to

        11          satisfy the court why he ought to be released on

        12          all three of the grounds that I am about to go

        13          through.

        14               Subsection (10) of 515 states:

        15               For the purposes of this section,

        16               the detention of an accused in

        17               custody is justified only on one or

        18               more of the following grounds:

        19               (a) where the detention is necessary

        20               to ensure his or her attendance in

        21               court in order to be dealt with

        22               according to law;

        23               (b) where the detention is necessary

        24               for the protection or safety of the

        25               public, including any victim of or

        26               witness to the offence, having

        27               regard to all the circumstances






       Official Court Reporters
                                        2





         1               including any substantial likelihood

         2               that the accused will, if released

         3               from custody, commit a criminal

         4               offence or interfere with the

         5               administration of justice; and

         6               (c) on any other just cause being

         7               shown and, without limiting the

         8               generality of the foregoing, where

         9               the detention is necessary in order

        10               to maintain confidence in the

        11               administration of justice, having

        12               regard to all the circumstances,

        13               including the apparent strength of

        14               the prosecution's case, the gravity

        15               of the nature of the offence, the

        16               circumstances surrounding its

        17               commission and the potential for a

        18               lengthy term of imprisonment.

        19               The third ground that I have just referred

        20          to has been read down by the Supreme Court of

        21          Canada to expunge the words "without limiting the

        22          generality of the foregoing", so that it is only

        23          in relation to the specific criteria set out in

        24          that subsection that an accused can be detained

        25          on the "any other just cause" ground set out in

        26          515(10)(c).

        27               This is a matter in Youth Justice Court and






       Official Court Reporters
                                        3





         1          sections 28 and 29 of the Youth Criminal Justice

         2          Act are applicable.  I will start off with

         3          section 28.  Section 28 of the Act provides that:

         4               Except to the extent that they are

         5               inconsistent with or excluded by

         6               this Act, the provisions of Part XVI

         7               (compelling the appearance of an

         8               accused and interim release) of the

         9               Criminal Code apply to the detention

        10               and release of young persons under

        11               this Act.

        12               What that means is the provisions of section

        13          515 apply except where they are specifically

        14          altered by those of the Youth Criminal Justice

        15          Act.

        16               Section 29(2), to some extent, alters the

        17          provisions of the Criminal Code dealing with

        18          judicial interim release.  Section 29(2) states

        19          that:

        20               In considering whether the detention

        21               of a young person is necessary for

        22               the protection or safety of the

        23               public under paragraph 515(10)(b) of

        24               the Criminal Code, a youth justice

        25               court or a justice shall presume

        26               that detention is not necessary

        27               under that paragraph if the young






       Official Court Reporters
                                        4





         1               person could not, on being found

         2               guilty, be committed to custody on

         3               the grounds set out in paragraphs

         4               39(1)(a) to (c) (restrictions on

         5               committals to custody).

         6               The present matter presents a case where

         7          section 39(1)(a) to (c) would apply if Mr. K.

         8          were found guilty of the charges he faces and

         9          were being sentenced on the matters that I have

        10          before the court.  If that were to occur, I could

        11          not sentence him to custody.  However, that does

        12          not mean that these proceedings are not reverse

        13          onus.  They are reverse onus.  Mr. K. has to show

        14          cause why he ought to be released but to do so he

        15          need only address the first and the third grounds

        16          set out in subsection 515(10) of the Criminal

        17          Code.  I am to presume that his detention is not

        18          necessary in order to protect the public as set

        19          out in section 515(10)(b) of the Criminal Code,

        20          given the fact that he could not be committed to

        21          custody if he were found guilty and sentenced on

        22          these particular offences that I now have before

        23          me.

        24               The word "presume" as it is used in section

        25          29(2) of the Youth Criminal Justice Act is

        26          important because in my view in using the word

        27          "presume", parliament has indicated its intention






       Official Court Reporters
                                        5





         1          that, like all presumptions, it can be rebutted.

         2          Here, the Crown has not attempted to do so.

         3               At the end of the day under the current

         4          circumstances that I have before me, I am left

         5          with a situation where the within proceedings

         6          dealing with the judicial interim release of the

         7          accused are reverse onus.  Mr. K. has to show

         8          cause why he ought not to be detained but only in

         9          relation to the first and third ground.  The onus

        10          is on the Crown to show why he ought to be

        11          detained on the second ground.  As stated, the

        12          Crown has not attempted to do so.

        13               Studies of mock juries have indicated that

        14          lay people have a great deal of difficulty in

        15          comprehending some legal concepts -  not all of

        16          them but some of them.  The legal concept which

        17          often seems to cause mock juries the most

        18          difficulty are onuses:  legal onuses, evidentiary

        19          onuses and onuses of persuasion.  In my view, the

        20          Youth Criminal Justice Act has created a very

        21          complicated scheme where the present

        22          circumstances I have before me apply.  I wonder

        23          about the ability of anyone without formal legal

        24          training to understand how to sort out all of

        25          these different onuses.

        26               In any event, I will do my best to sort them

        27          out now.






       Official Court Reporters
                                        6





         1               As I have indicated, the Crown has not

         2          attempted to show cause why the young person

         3          should be detained under the secondary ground and

         4          in my view the young person has adequately

         5          addressed the primary and the tertiary grounds

         6          here in court today.

         7               He is quite young; he was born in 1989, in

         8          August.  He has a criminal record but it is quite

         9          brief and it is quite minor.

        10               The package which has been worked on and

        11          proposed by Mr. Falvo is practicable and it is on

        12          that basis that I will order that the young

        13          person, Mr. K., be released upon his entering

        14          into an undertaking before me here today.

        15               In particular, I am satisfied that the

        16          arrangements which have been made with his

        17          sister, N.R., are sufficient to address the

        18          concern which I had in relation to the primary

        19          ground.

        20               He will be released upon his entering into

        21          an undertaking.  In addition to the statutory

        22          conditions, the undertaking will provide the

        23          following:  He is to have no contact whatsoever

        24          with J.G.; he is to reside at the residence of

        25          N.R., his sister; he is also not to be outside of

        26          that residence between the hours of 10:30 p.m.

        27          and 9:30 in the morning; he is to obey all of the






       Official Court Reporters
                                        7





         1          rules of the home of N.R.; he is to have no

         2          visitors during the hours of the curfew.

         3               Anything else?

         4      MS. SMALLWOOD:         Sir, I would just ask that he

         5          not attend Centre Square Mall.

         6      THE COURT:             All right, thank you.  He is

         7          not to attend within 25 meters of Centre Square

         8          Mall.  That means you've got to cross the street

         9          if you're going by that building.  Do you

        10          understand that?

        11      THE YOUNG PERSON:      Yes, Your Honour.

        12      THE COURT:             Anything else?

        13      MS. SMALLWOOD:         Nothing, Your Honour.

        14      MR. FALVO:             No, Your Honour, thank you.

        15      THE COURT:             Return date?

        16      MS. SMALLWOOD:         I would suggest next Monday at

        17          1:30 for Youth Court.

        18      THE COURT:             Fine.  So ordered.

        19               You're in custody right now.  You remain in

        20          custody until you sign that undertaking.

        21      THE ACCUSED:           Yes, sir.

        22      THE COURT:             I believe that that's

        23          everything, is it not?

        24      THE COURT CLERK:       Yes, sir, until 1:30.

        25      (ADJOURNMENT)

        26                ..............................

        27






       Official Court Reporters
                                        8





         1

         2

         3                             Certified to be a true and
                                       accurate transcript pursuant
         4                             to Rule 723 and 724 of the
                                       Supreme Court Rules of Court.
         5

         6
                                       ______________________________
         7                             Annette Wright, RPR, CSR(A)
                                       Court Reporter
         8

         9

        10

        11

        12

        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24

        25

        26

        27






       Official Court Reporters
                                        9
   
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.