Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision information:

Abstract: Transcript of the Reasons for Sentence

Decision Content



             R. v. Allen, 2010 NWTSC 95

                                                 S-1-CR2010000057

             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES



             IN THE MATTER OF:





                             HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN





                                  - vs. -





                             CHESTER JASON ALLEN



             _________________________________________________________

             Transcript of the Reasons for Sentence by The Honourable

             Justice J.E. Richard, at Yellowknife in the Northwest

             Territories, on November 29th A.D., 2010.

             _________________________________________________________

             APPEARANCES:



             Mr. M. Lecorre:                    Counsel for the Crown

             Mr. S. Shabala:                    Counsel for the Accused

                  ----------------------------------------

                Charge under s. 267(b) Criminal Code of Canada







      Official Court Reporters







         1      THE COURT:            The offender, Chester Jason

         2         Allen, is convicted of assault causing bodily

         3         harm contrary to Section 267 of the Criminal

         4         Code, and it is now the Court's responsibility

         5         to impose an appropriate sentence.

         6              The offence occurred at the North Slave

         7         Correctional Centre on October 4th, 2009, more

         8         than one year ago.  The victim of the assault

         9         was another inmate.  There was an altercation

        10         between the two and in the course of that

        11         altercation, this offender struck the victim on

        12         the face with a coffee mug which was filled with

        13         boiling liquid.

        14              The victim was taken to the local hospital

        15         to obtain treatment for second degree burns to

        16         his face and shoulder.  He was in hospital for

        17         five days.  He also received treatment from a

        18         local ophthalmologist for an injury to his right

        19         eye.  He suffered vision problems in his right

        20         eye for several weeks subsequent to this

        21         assault.  The victim has recovered from his

        22         injuries with the exception of minor but visible

        23         scarring on his face and upper body.

        24              The offence of assault causing bodily harm

        25         carries a maximum sentence of ten years'

        26         imprisonment in penitentiary.

        27              Mr. Allen's crime is very serious, and the





       Official Court Reporters        1








         1         sentence imposed must reflect the level of

         2         seriousness of the crime and Mr. Allen's level

         3         of responsibility for that serious crime.  This

         4         was the willful, intentional infliction of harm

         5         by striking the victim with hot boiling liquid

         6         and causing severe burns.  Although I am told

         7         that the victim has recovered except for some

         8         remaining scars, it is obvious from looking at

         9         the photograph exhibits that the victim suffered

        10         a great deal at the time.

        11              Specific and general deterrence and

        12         denunciation are important principles in the

        13         determination of an appropriate sentence for any

        14         violent behaviour and, in particular, when the

        15         violence occurs within a prison environment.  If

        16         the Court's sentence was not seen as a

        17         deterrent, and denunciatory, there would be

        18         chaos in our prisons.

        19              I am told that Mr. Allen is 33 years old

        20         and of Inuvialuit descent.  He spent a great

        21         deal of his earlier life in foster care in the

        22         Inuvik region.  He achieved a Grade 11 formal

        23         education and subsequently developed skills as a

        24         mechanic and has had regular employment in that

        25         field.  I am told that he is also an

        26         accomplished artist and is able to sell his

        27         artwork commercially.  Mr. Allen is married with





       Official Court Reporters        2








         1         seven children however in recent times he is

         2         estranged from his spouse.

         3              Mr. Allen has a lengthy criminal record and

         4         has been to jail many times, both as a young

         5         offender and as an adult.  The types of offences

         6         comprising his criminal record are varied

         7         however I note that he does not have any prior

         8         convictions for assaultive violent behaviour.

         9              In mitigation of sentence in this case is

        10         the fact that Mr. Allen waived a preliminary

        11         inquiry and offered a plea of guilty to an

        12         included offence, which plea was accepted by the

        13         prosecutor.  In the context of the waiver of

        14         preliminary and a guilty plea, it is regrettable

        15         that it is only now, today, more than 13 months

        16         after the offence, that the formal conviction

        17         and sentencing disposition takes place.

        18              Mr. Allen, today in open court, expressed

        19         his apologies to the victim of his crime and

        20         acknowledged his wrongdoing.  I am satisfied

        21         that today Mr. Allen is genuinely remorseful.

        22         That is to his credit and it bodes well for the

        23         life that he has ahead of him after he is

        24         released.

        25              Mr. Allen has been in custody awaiting

        26         disposition of this serious charge and

        27         accordingly I must deal with the fact of





       Official Court Reporters        3








         1         pre-sentencing time on remand.  I will briefly

         2         recite the background details.

         3              In August 2009, Mr. Allen was at large,

         4         here in Yellowknife, on a recognizance entered

         5         into by him, in July 2009 as a result of

         6         unrelated Criminal Code charges which arose in

         7         July 2009.  There were several conditions to the

         8         recognizance document which allowed him to be at

         9         large on those July 2009 outstanding Criminal

        10         Code charges. In August 2009, he breached three

        11         of those conditions and was arrested and charged

        12         with three counts of breach of recognizance.  He

        13         was detained in custody at the North Slave

        14         Correctional Centre.

        15              On April 7th, 2010, he was sentenced in

        16         Territorial Court on the three convictions for

        17         breach of recognizance.  The sentencing Judge

        18         imposed a total sentence of nine months

        19         imprisonment but gave credit for eight months

        20         time on remand, with a resulting net sentence of

        21         30 days imprisonment imposed on April 7th, 2010.

        22         He served that sentence but, not surprisingly,

        23         was further detained to await his trial on the

        24         present charge; i.e., the assault on the other

        25         inmate in October of 2009.

        26              But for this present charge, Mr. Allen

        27         would have been released from jail in late April





       Official Court Reporters        4








         1         2010.  He thus has been in remand status on the

         2         present charge for the past seven months.

         3              The fact that he was unable to obtain

         4         judicial interim release during these past seven

         5         months is, of course, primarily due to his

         6         lengthy list of convictions for disobeying court

         7         orders, including orders granting him bail.  In

         8         these circumstances, although I will give credit

         9         for the seven months remand time, I am not

        10         satisfied that he ought to get more credit than

        11         on a one-for-one ratio.

        12              Please stand, Mr. Allen.

        13              Chester Jason Allen, for the crime that you

        14         have committed, assault causing bodily harm

        15         contrary to Section 267 of the Criminal Code, it

        16         is the sentence of this Court that you be

        17         imprisoned for a period of 18 months.  I will

        18         give you credit of seven months for the remand

        19         time and therefore the net sentence is one of 11

        20         months imprisonment.

        21              In addition, I make an order under

        22         Section 109 of the Criminal Code with respect to

        23         prohibition of firearms for a period of ten

        24         years.  And finally, the DNA order sought by the

        25         Crown prosecutor, under Section 487.012 of the

        26         Criminal Code, will issue as well.

        27              Mr. Allen, your lawyer indicated to me this





       Official Court Reporters        5








         1         morning that you have told him that it is your

         2         intention, when you do get your release, to lead

         3         a crime-free life from here on in.  And I hope

         4         that you hold true to that statement that you

         5         made to your lawyer which he repeated in court

         6         here today.  You are 33 years old now, and I am

         7         sure you don't want to be spending any more time

         8         in jail.  You have already spent too much time

         9         there for a healthy young man.  You want to get

        10         back your relationship with your younger kids;

        11         you can't do it from inside that jail.  So I

        12         wish you well.

        13              You can sit down now.

        14              Anything further, counsel?

        15      MR. LECORRE:          Just with respect to the

        16         issue of the probation order, has Your Honour

        17         considered that?

        18      THE COURT:            I have considered that, Mr.

        19         Lecorre, and in my view the circumstances of

        20         this crime, it was within the prison walls, the

        21         altercation between he and the victim, it is not

        22         a similar circumstance to them having an

        23         altercation out in the wide world so I am

        24         satisfied, from hearing Mr. Allen this morning,

        25         he knows he has done wrong and he has apologised

        26         to the victim, and so I am content to leave it

        27         up to him to lead a crime-free life when he is





       Official Court Reporters        6








         1         released.

         2      MR. LECORRE:          Thank you, Your Honour.

         3         Nothing further from the Crown.

         4      MR. SHABALA:          Requesting the victim of

         5         crime surcharge be waived, Your Honour.

         6      THE COURT:            Yes, in the circumstances,

         7         there will be no victim fine surcharge, thank

         8         you for reminding me.

         9              We will close court.

        10

        11            -------------------------------------

        12

        13

        14                            Certified to be a true and
                                      accurate transcript pursuant
        15                            to Rules 723 and 724 of the
                                      Supreme Court Rules,
        16

        17

        18

        19                            ____________________________

        20                            Lois Hewitt, CSR(A), RPR, CRR
                                      Court Reporter
        21

        22

        23

        24

        25

        26

        27





       Official Court Reporters        7
   
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.