Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision information:

Abstract: Transcript of the Reasons for Sentence

Decision Content





             R. v. Fantasque, 2007 NWTSC 32           S-1-CR-2007-000020



                  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES



                  IN THE MATTER OF:





                                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



                                        - v -



                               TROY WILFORD FANTASQUE





             __________________________________________________________

             Transcript of the Reasons for Sentence delivered by The

             Honourable Justice J.Z. Vertes, sitting in Yellowknife, in

             the Northwest Territories, on the 7th day of May, A.D. 2007.

             __________________________________________________________



             APPEARANCES:

             Mr. S. Hinkley:                  Counsel for the Crown

             Ms. T. Nguyen:                   Counsel for the Accused



             (Charge under s. 239(a), 244, 268 Criminal Code of Canada)










        Official Court Reporters





         1      THE COURT:             The accused, Troy Fantasque,

         2          has pleaded guilty to a charge that he, during

         3          the evening of February 1st, 2007, at the Hamlet

         4          of Fort Liard, discharged a firearm with intent

         5          to wound Derwin Kotchea, the victim in this

         6          tragic case.

         7               The admitted facts reveal that the accused

         8          was drinking alcohol and consuming marijuana on

         9          the evening in question.  He was in a belligerent

        10          state, having gotten into arguments and fights

        11          with others.  At one point he threatened to shoot

        12          a number of people and had retrieved a sawed-off

        13          .22 calibre rifle.

        14               The accused repeatedly asked the victim to

        15          leave the house.  The victim laid down on a couch

        16          and pretended to sleep.  The accused then walked

        17          up to him and pointed the rifle at the victim's

        18          head.  He pulled the trigger and a .22 calibre

        19          round entered the victim's skull above his right

        20          eye.

        21               The accused then left the house and hid the

        22          rifle.

        23               The authorities were called by the accused's

        24          sister.  The victim was stabilized and medevaced

        25          to Edmonton.

        26               The accused was arrested later that morning.

        27          He was cooperative and told the police where they






       Official Court Reporters
                                        1





         1          could find the rifle.  He also made a voluntary

         2          inculpatory statement to the authorities.

         3               With respect to the victim's condition, I

         4          will recite the pertinent portions of the Agreed

         5          Statement of Facts:

         6                 The full extent of Mr. Kotchea's

         7                 injuries are not yet known.  The

         8                 .22 calibre round apparently

         9                 broke apart and followed two

        10                 trajectories, one to the orbital

        11                 floor and the other along the

        12                 left orbit and into the

        13                 musculature.  A part of the

        14                 bullet is lodged between

        15                 Mr. Kotchea's right sphenoid and

        16                 the temporal bone.  Mr. Kotchea

        17                 required surgery on the left side

        18                 of his face.  Mesh was inserted

        19                 into the orbital cavity of the

        20                 eye, along with a microplate and

        21                 sutures, and there are metallic

        22                 shrapnel fragments in the orbital

        23                 cavity, the nasopharynx and

        24                 sinuses.  There are soft tissue

        25                 changes in the sinuses along with

        26                 a medial bowing of the left

        27                 orbit.  As the round entered






       Official Court Reporters
                                        2





         1                 Mr. Kotchea's skull, it caused

         2                 multiple fracturing of the left

         3                 orbital walls and superior orbit.

         4                    At this point, Mr. Kotchea's

         5                 vision in his left eye is gone.

         6                 Although not certain at this

         7                 time, he may require the removal

         8                 of the eye in the future.  In any

         9                 event, the vision cannot be

        10                 restored.

        11               In this case, I have had the benefit of an

        12          extensive pre-sentence report, and I thank the

        13          probation officer who prepared it.

        14               The accused is 24 years old.  He and three

        15          siblings were raised in the small community of

        16          Fort Liard by his mother.  He was apparently

        17          raised in an unhealthy, dysfunctional environment

        18          where alcohol abuse was prevalent.  Proper

        19          structure and discipline were missing from his

        20          life.  The accused struggled with his education

        21          and quit at a Grade 10 level.  He has had

        22          sporadic employment as a labourer.

        23               The accused has a minor, unrelated criminal

        24          record.  However, he was described as being a

        25          kind and helpful individual, but one whose

        26          maturity level is far below what would be

        27          appropriate for his age.






       Official Court Reporters
                                        3





         1               The crime for which the accused has been

         2          convicted is extremely serious.  It carries a

         3          mandatory minimum sentence of four years'

         4          imprisonment; one of the few offences in the

         5          Criminal Code which require a mandatory minimum

         6          sentence.  The consequences of this senseless act

         7          will be felt by the victim, and his family, for

         8          the rest of his life.  Thus principles of

         9          deterrence and denunciation play a significant

        10          role in determining an appropriate sentence.

        11               On the other hand, I must give recognition

        12          to the genuine remorse demonstrated by the

        13          accused, as reflected most dramatically by this

        14          prompt guilty plea.  He is still a young man, so

        15          I must also look to the possibility of his

        16          rehabilitation.

        17               I am also required by the Criminal Code to

        18          give consideration to his status as an aboriginal

        19          offender.  The circumstances under which he grew

        20          up unfortunately reflect the reality of many

        21          aboriginal communities.  It can be considered to

        22          be part of the systemic problems that this young

        23          man and others like him have faced and provided a

        24          background for the reason why he is in court

        25          today.  It is sad but true, but alcohol and drug

        26          abuse is all too common in our communities, large

        27          or small; and I note particularly in the






       Official Court Reporters
                                        4





         1          pre-sentence report the fact that this offender

         2          started to abuse both alcohol and marijuana at a

         3          very young age and has continued to do so until

         4          this tragic event.

         5               Both counsel recognize that sentencing for

         6          this type of offence is very fact-specific.

         7          Sentences range over a wide spectrum.  Here,

         8          however, they are more or less in agreement on

         9          the appropriate range, and I find their

        10          submissions to be very helpful in this regard.

        11               Stand up, Mr. Fantasque.

        12               Mr. Fantasque, I find that an appropriate

        13          sentence in this case will be one of five years'

        14          imprisonment.  From that, I will provide credit

        15          for the time already spent on remand.

        16               The accused has been in custody for a little

        17          over three months, and at a normal credit of

        18          two-for-one, I will deduct six months from

        19          sentence, so that the effective sentence will be

        20          one of four and a half years.

        21               You may sit down.

        22               In addition, there will be an order

        23          requiring the accused to provide a blood sample

        24          for DNA analysis and registration in the DNA

        25          databank.

        26               There will also be an order imposing a

        27          firearms prohibition for a period of ten years.






       Official Court Reporters
                                        5





         1          That order will be subject to an exemption for

         2          sustenance purposes only pursuant to Section 113

         3          of the Criminal Code.

         4               On that last point, I note the evidence that

         5          the accused helps to support his extended family

         6          by hunting for food, and I also note that Crown

         7          counsel does not oppose the exemption.

         8               Mr. Fantasque, as I said, you are still a

         9          young man.  This was a senseless, unprovoked act,

        10          and is something that will affect you for the

        11          rest of your life and I hope may lead you to

        12          considering how you can change your life to be

        13          far more productive in the future - far more

        14          productive and caring for yourself and others

        15          around you.  For your sake, as counsel had

        16          mentioned previously, this act could have been

        17          far, far more serious.  But I am sure you

        18          appreciate that the consequences of your act will

        19          live with the victim, Mr. Kotchea, for the rest

        20          of his life and you owe him a great debt.

        21               Thank you, Counsel, for your assistance in

        22          this case.

        23               .................................

        24

        25

        26

        27






       Official Court Reporters
                                        6





         1

         2

         3                        Certified Pursuant to Rule 723
                                  of the Rules of Court
         4

         5

         6                        Jane Romanowich, CSR(A), RPR
                                  Court Reporter
         7

         8

         9

        10

        11

        12

        13

        14

        15

        16

        17

        18

        19

        20

        21

        22

        23

        24

        25

        26

        27






       Official Court Reporters
                                        7   
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.