Supreme Court
Decision Information
Decision information:
Abstract: Judicial review of decision of the Makenzie Valley Land and Water Board
Decision Content
Chicot v. Paramount Res. Ltd. et al, 2006 NWT SC 31 Date: 2006 06 29 Docket: S-001-CV2006000033 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES BETWEEN: CHIEF LLOYD CHICOT suing on his own behalf and on behalf of all Members of the KaaGee Tu First Nation and the KAAGEE TU FIRST NATION APPLICANTS -AND- PARAMOUNT RESOURCES LTD., and the MACKENZIE VALLEY LAND AND WATER BOARD RESPONDENTS __________________________________________________________________ Judicial review of decision of the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board. Heard at Yellowknife, NT on June 5, 2006 Reasons filed: June 29, 2006 __________________________________________________________________ REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE V.A.SCHULER Counsel for the Applicant: Timothy J. Howard Counsel for the Respondent Paramount Resources Ltd.: Everett L. Bunnell, Q.C. Counsel for the Respondent Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board: Ron Kruhlak Chicot v. Paramount Res. Ltd. et al, 2006 NWT SC 31 Date: 2006 06 29 Docket: S-001-CV2006000033 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES BETWEEN: CHIEF LLOYD CHICOT suing on his own behalf and on behalf of all Members of the KaaGee Tu First Nation and the KAAGEE TU FIRST NATION APPLICANTS -AND- PARAMOUNT RESOURCES LTD., and the MACKENZIE VALLEY LAND AND WATER BOARD RESPONDENTS REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT [1] For the reasons given in my decision of June 29, 2006 on file S-0001-CV-2006-000008, the application for judicial review filed by amended originating notice on February 28, 2006 is granted, the permit is quashed and Paramounts application is remitted to the MVLWB for further action. [2] Costs are awarded to the First Nation as on file S-0001-CV-2006-000008. V.A. Schuler J.S.C. Dated at Yellowknife NT, this 29th day of June, 2006. Counsel for the Applicant: Timothy J. Howard Counsel for the Respondent Paramount Resources Ltd.: Everett L. Bunnell, Q.C. Counsel for the Respondent Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board: Ron Kruhlak Page?3
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.