Supreme Court
Decision Information
Decision information:
Abstract: Direction that notice of appeal be given to third parties as specified
Decision: Direction that notice of appeal be given to third parties as specified
Subjects: Civil procedure - Appeals - Notice of appeal
Decision Content
Date: Docket: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES IN THE MATTER OF an application for the Disclosure of Government Information, pursuant to the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act, S.N.W.T. 1994, c.20, as amended; AND IN THE MATTER OF Review Decision 98-030 of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of the Northwest Territories, dated 28 April, 1998 and received by the Appellants on 9 May, 1998; BETWEEN: THE CANADIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION and LEE SELLECK Appellants -and- THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SERVICES OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Respondents DIRECTIONS The following directions are issued as a result of the meeting held with counsel on June 4, 1999: [1] Counsel for the Respondents will give written notice of this appeal to the third parties (as identified by the Information and Privacy Commissioner) and to the Government of Nunavut. The notice will specify that if any of those parties wish to make representations on this appeal then they should be in attendance in Chambers in Yellowknife on Monday, July 19, 1999, at 2:00 P.M., and the purpose of that session (as noted below). [2] Service will be effected, on or before June 25, 1999, by ordinary mail and fax. An affidavit of service is to be prepared and filed. [3] At the session on July 19th, the parties should be prepared to address: (a) a date for the hearing of the appeal; (b) the contents of the appeal record ; (c) timelines and order for filing of written arguments; and, (d) to what extent, if any, the appeal proceedings should be in camera . Dated this 4th day of June, 1999. J. Z. Vertes J.S.C. To: James D. Brydon Counsel for the Appellants Yvonne M. MacNeill Counsel for the Respondents [4]
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.