Supreme Court
Decision Information
Summary: previous ex parte order restraining property which is allegedly proceeds of crime -- application for relief by legal owner of restrained property -- applicant and accused had entered agreement for sale -- accused allegedly defaulted on payments which were conditions of sale -- restraining order requires Applicant to obtain leave of the Court before proceedings against the accused to rectify default under the sale agreement -- leave granted -- Seized Property Management Direcotrate failed to make accused's monthly payments to Applicant from rents collected from tenants -- discussion of rights and obligations of unpaid vendor, however no order with respect to monthly rental payments made
Abstract: innocent third parties - agreement for sale - unpaid vendor
Decision: party and party costs to Applicant
Subjects: Sale of land - Agreements for sale - Remedies of vendor - Forfeiture of money paid under agreement - Relief from forfeiture