Supreme Court

Decision Information

Tenant v Luric Enterprises Ltd.

Court Supreme Court
Date 1989-04-03
File numbers 00813
Judge(s) de Weerdt
Location Yellowknife
Cases and statutes considered Cases considered:
STAGMAN V. HAMM (1984) 5 W.W.R. 148 (SASK. C.A.)

Statutes considered:
SEIZURES ACT, R.O.N.W.T., 1974, C. S-7, SS. 30, 35 AND 36
Decision information:

Abstract: Application by Plaintiff for a pre-trial determination of two questions of law - In the alternative, application for an order pursuant to sections 35 and 36 of the Seizures Act.
Decision: Applications dismissed with costs to the defendant - Court declined to make a determination of the two questions posed as to do so would effectively render a decision prior trial on the underlying facts of the action - Sections 35 and 36 of the Seizures Act not applicable as it only confers rights of seizure on the Sheriff.
Subjects: Creditors and debtors - Execution - Seizure - Validity
Civil procedure

Decision Content

There is no document available for this decision.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.