Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision information:

Abstract: Application for prohibition of the Respondents from acting as a Board of Inquiry and conducting a hearing into charges of malpractice against the Applicant - Complaints received by certain members of the public as to competency of the Applicant.
Decision: Prohibition granted on grounds of reasonable apprehension of bias - Court found evidence that the Board treated as fact certain unproven facts and had essentially pre-judged the Applicant.
Subjects: Medicine and health disciplines - Pharmacists
Keywords: Resaonable apprehension of bias
Natural justice
Jurisdiction - prohibition

Decision Content

There is no document available for this decision.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.