Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision information:

Abstract: Action for debt on an account - Defendant Mackenzie substantially indebted to the Plaintiff - Defendant Vail guaranteed the debts of Mackenzie - Defendant Vail claimed he signed the guarantee, not in his personal capacity, but as a shareholder in the Defendant Mackenzie.
Decision: Action allowed and judgment entered against both Defendants - Court rejected the argument of non est factum by the Defendant Vail - Defendant Vail not credible in his testimony - Court found he was aware of the effect of the guarantee and not misled by the Plaintiff - Nominal damages to the Defendant for breach of contract by the Plaintiff - Set off by counterclaim in the amount of $500.00 - Costs to the Plaintiff.
Subjects: Contracts - Mistake - Non est factum
Creditors and debtors

Decision Content

There is no document available for this decision.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.