Supreme Court
Decision Information
Decision information:
Abstract: The Defendant moved to vary a default judgment by reducing by $61,352.30. He alleged that a settlement had been agreed to before the Plaintiff obtained default judgment. He also argued the principle of estoppel by acquiescence. The evidence demonstrated that no settlement had been reached.
Decision: Application dismissed with costs at double column 4 of the tariff. No Meritorious defence put forward demonstrating triable issue.
Subjects: Civil procedure
Keywords: Default judgment - variation - estoppel by axquiescence - Rule 166
Decision Content
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.