Supreme Court

Decision Information

Viswalingam v Fort Smith (Health Centre Board of Management)

Court Supreme Court
Date 1992-11-13
Other citations (1992) – 16 Admin. L.R. (2d) 322 (N.W.T. C.A.) – 9 Admin. L.R. (2d) 281 (N.W.T. S.C.) – reversed (1993)
File numbers CV 03990
Judge(s) Vertes
Location Yellowknife
Cases and statutes considered Cases considered:
American Cyanamid Co. v. Ethicon Ltd., [1975] All E.R. 504 (H.L.)
Enterprises Realty Ltd. v. Barnes Lake Cattle Co. Ltd. (1979), 101 D.L.R. (3d) 92 (B.C.C.A.
Hollinger Bus Lines Ltd. v. Ontario Labour Relations Board, [1952] O.R. 366 (C.A.)
Westlake v. R. [1971} 3 O.R. 533 (H.C.J.), affirmed [1972] 2 O.R. 605, affirmed [1973] S.C.R. vii
Law Society of Alberta v. Black et al (1983), 8 D.L.R. (4th) 346 (Alta. C.A.)
Community Health Services Association (Saskatoon) Ltd. v. College of physicians and Surgeons (Saskatchewan) et al (1966), 57 D.L.R. (2d) 71 (Sask. Q.B.)
Ominayak v. Norcen Energy Resources Ltd. (1985), 58 A.R. 161 (C.A.)
Dessureault v. Alberta Racing Commission et al (1983), 49 A.R. 238 (Q.B.)
Re Gillen and College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (1989), 68 O.R. (2d) 278 (Div.Ct.)
Re Voutsis and College of Physicians and Surgeons (1987), 34 C.C.C. (3d) 560 (Sask. Q.B.)
Manitoba Dental Association v. Byman & Halstead (1962), 34 D.L.R. (2d) 602 (Man. C.A.)
Governors of the University of Alberta v. Alberta Human Rights Commission (1988), 90 A.R. 63 (Q.B.)

Statutes considered:
Northwest Territories Supreme Court Rules, R. 48 ( 3 )
Medical Profession Act, R.S.N.W.T. 1988, c. M-9, s. 23
Judicature Act, R.S.N.W.T. 1988, c. J-1, s. 41 ( 1 )
Decision information:

Abstract: Application for interim injunction preventing the Board of Inquiry from proceeding with its hearing until the trial of the action. Injunctive relief could only be granted if the Board was made a party
Decision: Application to add board of Inquiry as a party defendant granted. Applications for interim injunctions granted.
Subjects: Civil procedure - Parties - Adding or substituting parties - Defendants

Decision Content

There is no document available for this decision.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.