Supreme Court

Decision Information

R v Martel

Court Supreme Court
Date 1980-08-05
Other citations (sub nom. Martel v. R.) (1980) – 23 A.R. 361 (N.W.T. S.C.) – 8 M.V.R. 167
Judge(s) Tallis
Location Yellowknife
Cases and statutes considered Cases considered:
Chouinard v. R, [1963] S.C.R. 279, 39 C.R. 352
R. v. Banks, [1972] 1 W.L.R. 346, [1972] 1 All E.R. 1041, [1972] R.T.R. 179, [1972] Crim. L.R. 237, 56 Cr App. R. 310 (C.A.)
R. v. Bentsen (1975), 24 C.C.C. (2d) 556
R. v. Costa (1980), 6 M.V.R. 75 (ont. H.C.)
R. v. Ebner [1979] 2 S.C.R. 996, [1975] 5 W.W.R. 448, 28 N.R. 91, 47 C.C.C. (2d) 292 (Sub nom Ebner v. R.), 101 D.L.R. (3d) 202
R. v. Funk (1978), 6 Alta. L.R. (2d) 138 (Dist. Ct.)
R. v. Nichols (1978), 6 Alta. L.R. (2d) 14, 14 A.R. 210, affirmed 9 Alta L.R. (2d) 342n
R. v. Oakley (1980), 6 M.V.R. 158 (Alta. Q.B.)
R. v. Tunke (1975), 25 C.C.C. (2d) 518 (Alta. Q.B.)
R. v. Turner
R. v. Walsh (1980), 6 M.V.R. 125 (Ont. C.A.)

Statutes considered:
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 235(1)
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 236
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 237(5)
Decision information:

Summary: Appeal dismissed with leave to speak to costs
Abstract: Appeal by accused from conviction for impaired driving
Decision: Appeal dismissed
Subjects: Criminal law - Motor vehicle offences - Breathalyzer evidence - Admissibility of certificate of analysis - Notice of intention to produce certificate evidence
Keywords: Impaired driving
Evidence
Conviction appeal

Decision Content

There is no document available for this decision.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.