Supreme Court

Decision Information

R v Chabun

Court Supreme Court
Date 1982-08-03
Other citations (1982) – 39 A.R. 485 – 70 C.C.C. (2d) 280 (N.W.T. S.C.)
File numbers SC 2606
Judge(s) de Weerdt
Location Yellowknife
Cases and statutes considered Cases considered:
R. v. Atwood, [1972] 5 W.W.R. 600, 8 C.C.C. (2d) 147, reversing [1972] 4 W.W.R. 399, 7 C.C.C. (2d) 116 (N.W.T. Mag. Ct.)
R v. Panarctic Oils Ltd. (1982), 38 A>R. 447
R. v. Kowerchuck, [1972] 5 W.W.R. 255, 15 C.R.N.S. 95, 3 C.C.C. (2d) 291 (Alta. Prov. Ct.)
R. v. Burns, [1975] 4 W.W.R. 305, 30 C.R.N.S. 387, 25 C.C.C. (2d) 391 (B.C. Co. Ct.)
R. v. Scheller (1976), 37 C.R.N.S. 320, 32 C.C.C. (2d) 273 (Ont. P.C.)
R. v. Buckley 91976), 38 C.R.N.S. 12 (Ont. C.C.)
R. v. Dunlop (1977), 37 C.R.N.W. 261 (B.C. P.C.)
R. v. Lebrun, [1979] 1 W.W.R. 764, 45 C.C.C. (2d) 300, 7 C.R. (3d) 93 (B.C.C.A.)
R. v. Lizzee, [1978] 4 W.W.R. 736, 4 C.R. (3d) 115, 42 C.C.C. (2d) 174 (B.C.S.C.)
R. v. Rourke, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 1021, 16 N.R. 181, 76 D.L.R. (3d) 193, 35 C.C.C. (2d) 129, 38 C.R.N.S. 268, [1977] 5 W.W.R. 487
R. v. Osborn, [1969] 1 O.R. 152, 4 C.C.C. 185, 1 D.L.R. (3d) 664 (Ont. C.A.), reversed [1972] S.C.R. 184, 15 D.L.R. (3d) 85, 1 C.C.C. (2d) 482
R. v. Orysiuk, [1977] 6 W.W.R. 410, 37 C.C.C. (2d) 445, 1 C.R. (3d) 311
R. v. Krannenberg (1980), 51 C.C.C. (2d) 205, 108 D.L.R. (3d) 333, 31 N.R. 206 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Bjorklund (1977), 39 C.R.N.S. 346 (B.C.S.C.)
R. v. Jones (1978), 4 C.R. (3d) 76 (B.C.S.C.)
Haugen v. R. (1981) 21 C.R. (3d) 203 (B.C. C.A.)
Rogers v. R. (1981), 22 C.R. (3d) 189 (B.C.S.C.)

Statutes considered:
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, s. 732.1
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 7
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 24
Decision information:

Abstract: Application by accused for prohibition and certiorari of proceedings against accused on the basis of abuse of process
Decision: Application dismissed
Subjects: Criminal law - Abuse of process - Stay of proceedings
Administrative law - Judicial review of decisions - Remedies - Certiorari
Keywords: Abuse of process
Unreasonable delay

Decision Content

There is no document available for this decision.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.