Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                                 Citation:  R. v. Abbass, 2004 NSSC 109

 

                                                                                                                               Date: 20040608

                                                                                                                   Docket: S.H. 214552A

                                                                                                                              Registry: Halifax

 

 

Between:

 

                                                          Her Majesty The Queen

                                                                                                                                            Appellant

 

                                                                             v.

 

                                                           Todd Stephen Abbass

                                                                                                                                       Respondent

 

 

                                                            LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:           The Honourable Justice C. Richard Coughlan

 

Heard:           April 29, 2004

 

Decision:      June 8, 2004

 

Subject:        Summary Conviction Appeal - Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Trial within reasonable time

 

Summary:    The Appellant was charged with impaired driving and failure of a Breathalyzer test.  The Appellant, through experienced counsel, entered a not guilty plea and requested a full day hearing.  Counsel was informed by the court clerk of the first available date.  The trial date was approximately fourteen and one half months after the date of the charge.  The Appellant alleged his right to be tried within a reasonable time had been infringed.  The trial judge found his right to be tried within a reasonable time had been infringed and ordered a stay of proceedings.

 

Issue:            The issue for the Court is whether the trial judge erred in ruling the Appellant’s rights pursuant to s. 11(b) of the Charter had been infringed or denied. 


 

 

Result:          There was no evidence of actual prejudice to the Appellant.  From the facts, the Appellant appeared to be content with the pace at which matters were proceeding.  The trial judge erred in inferring prejudice from the passage of time on the facts of the case in the absence of evidence of actual prejudice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

               THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT’S DECISION.

                       QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.