Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

                                     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                               Citation R  v.  Black,  2002 NSSC 276

 

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20021220

                                                                                                                         Docket: Cr. # 145665

                                                                                                                                Registry:  Halifax

 

 

Between:

 

                                                            Her Majesty The Queen

                                                                                                                                                  Crown

 

                                                                             v.

 

 

                                                       Frederick William Logan Black

 

                                 Defendant

                                                                             

                                                            LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:                       The Honourable Justice John D. Murphy

 

Heard:                       May 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29 and 30, 2002

June 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 27, 2002

July 2, 3, and 4, 2002

August 20 and 21, 2002

December 20, 2002

 

Written Decision:   December 20, 2002                                    

 

 

Subject:                    Criminal Law - Fraud - Criminal Code Section 380(1)(a)     

 

Summary:                The Accused’s company, NsC Diesel Power Inc., was engaged in a business arrangement with Krupp MaK involving supply of marine engines during refit of vessel Louis St. Laurent.  NsC’s participation in the project included providing a facility at Sheet Harbour, Nova Scotia for testing MaK engines and equipment.  NsC arranged financing for the Sheet Harbour facility from ABN Bank and ACOA, both of which required $5,000,000 equity contribution by NsC.


During February 1989, when the Sheet Harbour project was in early stages, Accused requested and obtained $1,000,000 for NsC from MaK, and ABN Bank and ACOA advanced funds upon being advised that the $1,000,000 obtained from MaK was injected as equity into NsC.

 

NsC was eventually adjudged bankrupt, the funds advanced were not repaid to MaK and the financial assistance provided by ABN and ACOA was not repaid.

 

 

Issue(s):                    a.         Whether Accused defrauded MaK by misrepresenting the need and use to which NsC would put the $1,000,000 payment.

 

b.         Whether Accused defrauded ABN and ACOA by misrepresenting the $1,000,000 received from MaK to be an equity investment in NsC.

 

Result:                                    Accused guilty of defrauding MaK, ABN, and ACOA.  The $1,000,000 payment was found to be a loan from MaK to NsC, which was advanced relying upon representations by Accused that NsC would use the proceeds for specific purposes associated with the Sheet Harbour project. 

 

Accused was guilty of defrauding MaK when he directed use of loan proceeds for other purposes, including substantial payments to companies related to NsC.

 

Accused was guilty of defrauding ABN and ACOA when he misrepresented in a statutory declaration that the $1,000,000 loan from MaK was an equity injection into NsC.  That misrepresentation induced ABN and ACOA to advance funds which would otherwise not have been made available to NsC, and which were not repaid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.