Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

Citation: E.M.G. v. G.R.W. 2007 NSSC 356

 

 

Date: 20071219

Docket: S.H. 287917

Registry: Halifax, NS

 

Between:                        

 

E.M.G.

Respondent/Applicant

v.

 

G.R.W.

Applicant/Respondent

 

 

LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge: The Honourable Associate Chief Justice Deborah K. Smith

 

Heard:            November 27th, 2007, December 3rd, 4th, 5th, 2007, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

Oral Decision:            December 6th, 2007

 

Written Decision:       December 19th, 2007

 

Subject:           Domestic Violence Intervention Act

 

Summary:       Application for a review of an Emergency Protection Order issued pursuant to the Domestic Violence Intervention Act.

 

Issue:              Should an Emergency Protection Order have been granted in the circumstances of this case?

 


Result:            The Domestic Violence Intervention Act is an extraordinary piece of legislation in that it allows a Justice of the Peace to grant significant remedies to an Applicant without any notice to, evidence from or representations from the Respondent.  The legislation is designed to deal with urgent situations which require immediate relief in order to protect against domestic violence.  The fact that domestic violence has occurred is not, in itself, sufficient reason to grant an Emergency Protection Order.  In order to grant such an Order, the Justice of the Peace must be satisfied that domestic violence has occurred and that the Order should be made forthwith.

 

The facts of this case did not support the granting of an Emergency Protection Order. After considering the totality of the evidence, the Court was not satisfied that the facts that existed justified an emergency intervention.  Accordingly, the Court ordered the termination of the Emergency Protection Order.

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.            QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.