Family Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

                                      IN THE FAMILY COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                           Citation: M.L.A.R., v.G.T.R., 2011 NSFC 7

 

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20110322

                                                                                                                Docket: FYMCA - 038252

                                                                                                                            Registry: Yarmouth

 

Between:

                                                                 MLAR and WER

                                                                                                                                          - Applicants

                                                                             v.

                                                                  GTR(F) and JPJ

                                                                                                                                      - Respondents

 

 

                                                         LIBRARY HEADING

 

 

Judge:             The Honourable Judge John D. Comeau    

 

Heard:                        Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, February 2, 2011

 

Decision Date:           March 2, 2011

 

 

 

Issue:            Duty of parents and guardians to provide child support and a contribution to                   special expenses.  Apportionment of special expenses between parents and                        guardians.

 

Summary:    The guardians had de facto custody of a child 18 months after his birth (February16 1996).  They applied for custody in 2005 and the matter was adjourned without date after numerous court appearances.  In November of 2010 the guardians applied for child support and special expenses for orthodontic treatment.

 

Result:          As a remedial solution the custody application was brought forward by the Court.                          It was in the childs best interest that custody be granted to the guardians as of 2005.  The parents did not oppose this.  Child support was ordered to be paid by the parents as per the child support tables.  This did not amount to excessive child support because of the parents minimal income.

 

 

 


 

Special expenses were apportioned three ways with the guardians being required                         to pay for the childs contribution (see section 7(2) of the N.S. Child                  Maintenance Guidelines).

 

As a result of the parties being unrepresented the Court provided them with a                      payment schedule.

 

 

 

 

THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.