Family Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

                                       IN THE FAMILY COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                          Citation: C.A.L. v. P.M.L., 2009 NSFC 20

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20090831

                                                                                                                           Docket: 08Y061548

                                                                                                                           Registry:  Yarmouth

 

Between:

                                                                         C.A.L.

                                                                                                                                              Applicant

                                                                             v.

 

                                                                         P.M.L.

                                                                                                                                          Respondent

 

                                                          LIBRARY HEADER

 

Judge:             The Honourable John D. COMEAU

Chief Judge of the Family Court of Nova Scotia

 

Heard:                        Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, August 5, 2009

 

Written Decision:       August 31, 2009          

 

Issue:                                    Child and spousal support. Determination of income. Self-employed

                                     earnings.

 

Summary:                The respondent is a self-employed fisherman who is the sole shareholder

                                    of a limited company set up to run his business of fishing.  He also set up

a family trust as a form of tax planning.  The parties separated after a

fifteen year marriage and each one has custody of one of the two children

of the marriage.  The Applicant request child and spousal support.  The

parties entered into an interim consent order in December of 2008 for

the payment of child and spousal support.  There are arrears with

respect to this order, the amount of which is disputed.  The Respondent

supplied both corporate and personal income and expenses.  Valuation

of assets, some which have been amortized ( depreciated) have been

considered. 

                                   

  

 

 

 

 

 


                                  

Result:                      The Court imputes the respondents income at $75,000 per annum and

discussed the prospective notice of determinations of annual income.

The Court considered Wilcox v. Snow, 1999 NSCA 163 which dealt with

how to determine self-employed income.  The applicants income was

found to be $12,000 per annum.  Child support was determined based on a \                         shared parenting scenario and set off income as outlined in Contino v.

Contino, 2005 S.C.C. 63.  The applicant was entitled to spousal support

(economic dependency) and it was determined by using the spousal

support advisory guidelines.  The set off amount of $583 a month was

ordered for child support and spousal support of $737 both payable to

the applicant

 

 

 

. THIS INFORMATION SHEET DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE COURT'S DECISION.  QUOTES MUST BE FROM THE DECISION, NOT THIS LIBRARY SHEET.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.