Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal

Citation: R. v. Cromwell, 2016 NSCA 84

Date: 20161110

Docket: CAC 431387

Registry: Halifax

Between:

Aidan David Cromwell

Appellant

v.

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

 

 

Judge:

The Honourable Justice Elizabeth Van den Eynden

Appeal Heard:

May 16, 2016, in Halifax, Nova Scotia

Subject:

Post-offence conduct.  Limiting instructions to jury.

Summary:

A jury found Mr. Cromwell guilty of second-degree murder.  Mr. Cromwell appealed, alleging, among other grounds, that the trial judge erred in his instructions to the jury on post-offence conduct.  The Court found the instructions were inadequate and amounted to an error of law.  The error could have materially affected the jury’s deliberations and could not be saved by the curative proviso.  This issue is dispositive of the appeal.

Issues:

Did the trial judge err by failing to provide a proper limiting instruction to the jury on the use of post-offence conduct?

 

Result:

Appeal allowed.  Conviction set aside and new trial ordered.

This information sheet does not form part of the court’s judgment.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet. The full court judgment consists of 12 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.