Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

CASE NO.                                     VOL. NO.                                            PAGE

 

RUBY BANKS                                                                                 THE PORTAGE LA PRAIRIE

                                                                         - and -            MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

                                                                                                                                                           

(Appellant)                                                                                                                  (Respondent)

 

                                                                             

CA 155159                                               Halifax, N.S.                                                FLINN, J.A.

                                                                                                                                                           

                                        [Cite as: Banks v. Portage La Prairie Mutual

                                             Insurance Company, 1999 NSCA 137]

 

 

APPEAL HEARD:                                 November 10, 1999

 

JUDGMENT DELIVERED:                 November 10, 1999

 

WRITTEN RELEASE OF ORAL:       November 16, 1999

 

 

SUBJECT:         Continuing Section B benefits - failure of the insured to prove entitlement - the Insurance Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 231, Part IV, Section B

 

SUMMARY:        The appellant brought action against her insurer for continuing income replacement benefits under the provisions of Section B to Part IV of the Insurance Act.  The trial judge concluded that the appellant had not discharged the burden of proof that, on a balance of probabilities, the appellant was prevented from engaging in any occupation or employment for which she is reasonably suited.  He came to that conclusion because of his findings that the preponderance of medical evidence, and the evidence of the appellant, did not satisfy him that she was unable to do much of the work that she did before the accident.

 

RESULT:            Appeal dismissed.  The trial judge made no reversible error in his conclusion or in his evidentiary findings on which that conclusion is based.

 

 

 

 

  This information sheet does not form part of the court’s decision.  Quotes must be from the judgment, not this cover sheet.  The full court judgment consists of 2 pages.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.