56 result(s)
-
1.
Harris v. Keating Construction Company Ltd. - 2012 NSSC 425 - 2012-11-21
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, Counsel for the Defendants By the Court: [1] The following is my decision in regard to the Defendants' motion for disclosure of documents pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 15.02. [...] In support of the Motion, the Defendants' Solicitor, Hugh R. McLeod, filed an Affidavit, containing letters by the Plaintiffs' counsel to the Defendants' counsel. [...] The letters outline Mr. McLeod's request for the documentation, but provide little else in terms of evidence to support the Motion.
-
2.
MacKinlay v. MacKinlay Estate - 1993 NSCA 115 - 1993-07-08
Court of Appeal - DecisionTHE ESTATE OF HUGH PALMER ) MACKINLAY ) Respondent ) Appeal Heard: [...] In McLeod v. McNab, [1891] P.C. 471 Lord Hannen in delivering the judgment of the Privy Council stated at p. 474: [...] The Estate of Hugh Palmer ) MacKinlay ) ) JONES, ) J.A. Respondent )
-
3.
Fitzgerald v. Royal Sun Alliance Insurance Company - 2011 NSSC 132 - 2011-03-31
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Hugh McLeod, for the plaintiff Kevin Quigley, for the defendant [...] On that date, Royal received a letter from Hugh McLeod, Counsel for the Plaintiff, addressed to Bluenose Insurance wherein Mr. McLeod advised that Fitzgerald had been injured on February 21, 2010 and wanted to open up a "Section B and Section D claim." [...] In fact, Fitzgerald did not report the Incident to Royal, in writing or otherwise, until April 13, 2010 when Fitzgerald's Counsel, Hugh McLeod, wrote to Bluenose Insurance and advised that Fitzgerald had been injured on February 21, 2010 and wanted to open up a "Section B and Section D claim."
-
4.
Hillier v. Mann - 2001 NSSC 180 - 2001-11-23
Supreme Court - DecisionCOUNSEL: Hugh R. McLeod for the Plaintiff C. Patricia Mitchell for the Defendant [...] [“Emphasis Mr. McLeod”] [8] The issue that the court should decide the loss of future damages and drug expense was raised by Mr. McLeod during the time the jury was deliberating on its verdict. [...] The letter was directed to Mr. McLeod, and the full text is as follows:
-
5.
Baird v. Barkhouse - 2012 NSSC 339 - 2012-09-26
Supreme Court - DecisionReceived from Mr. McLeod on September 5, 2012 Written Decision: September 26, 2012 [...] Counsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for the Plaintiff Guy LaFosse, Q.C., for the Defendant
-
6.
Hussey v. Hussey Estate - 2018 NSSC 329 - 2018-12-05
Supreme Court - DecisionInstead, she later had her Will completed in consultation with solicitor, Hugh R. McLeod. [...] 11. THAT I realize this is an unequal division which has troubled me for many years and as a result of this I have had the occasion to seek the advice of two lawyers but have decided to take the advice of Hugh R. McLeod and that is to do what I want and to my own self be true.
-
7.
Simpson Estate v. Cox - 2006 NSCA 125 - 2006-11-14
Court of Appeal - DecisionCounsel: Hugh McLeod, for the appellant Dionysia Mack and J. Scott Barnett, for the respondent
-
8.
Wescott v. Dumont - 2006 NSSC 335 - 2006-10-25
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for Marilyn Wescott Harvey M. McPhee, for Jean Yves Dumont [...] Wescott’s counsel, Hugh MacLeod then made an Interlocutory Notice, Application Inter-Parties on the 5th day of April, 2006 for an Order that the defendant, Dumont has no insurable interest in the property and further the Defendant, Dumont has no interest in Policy No. 5840036, pursuant to Civil Procedure Rules 12.01(2)(b);
-
9.
A.K.W. Homes Ltd. v. County Realty Ltd. - 1995 NSCA 9 - 1995-02-03
Court of Appeal - Decision) A. K. W. HOMES LIMITED ) Hugh R. McLeod ) for the Appellant Appellant )
-
10.
Nyiti v. Cape Breton University - 2009 NSCA 69 - 2009-06-17
Court of Appeal - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for the appellant Nancy F. Bareaux and Krista Smith, for the respondent
-
11.
Waterside Auto Sales v. Halifax Nissan - 2003 NSSC 24 - 2003-01-29
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, Esq., for the Plaintiff / Defendant by Counterclaim
-
12.
Mike's Laundromat Ltd.v. Buns and Son Realty Ltd. - 2003 NSSC 66 - 2003-03-26
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for the Applicant No one appearing for the Respondent
-
13.
Hillier v. Mann - 2002 NSCA 109 - 2002-09-10
Court of Appeal - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod for the appellant C. Patricia Mitchell and Ian C. Pickard for the respondent
-
14.
Morrison v. Morrison Estate - 2012 NSSC 451 - 2012-12-31
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, Counsel for Kenneth Morrison By the Court: [1] This is a Decision on Costs in relation to my ruling on August 30, 2012. [...] [25] The primary issue in the Application was whether the actions of the Executor, in not accepting an undertaking from Kenneth Morrison’s solicitor, Mr. McLeod, to pay the Estate expenses, was unreasonable.
-
15.
Simpson Estate v. Cox - 2006 NSSC 116 - 2006-04-07
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, Counsel for the Plaintiff Dennise Mack, Counsel for the Defendant
-
16.
Homewood Enterprises Ltd. v. 147486 Canada Ltd. - 2002 NSSC 126 - 2002-05-09
Supreme Court - DecisionCOUNSEL: Hugh R. McLeod, Esq., for the Respondent/Plaintiff Steven G. Zatzman, Esq., for the Applicant/Defendant
-
17.
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company v. Hillier - 2005 NSCA 151 - 2005-11-24
Court of Appeal - DecisionHugh McLeod, for the respondent Reasons for judgment: [1] This is an appeal from an unsuccessful summary judgment application.
-
18.
MacNeil v. Black - 1998 NSCA 48 - 1998-02-13
Court of Appeal - DecisionBRENDA MACNEIL ) Hugh McLeod ) for the Appellant Appellant ) ) - and - )
-
19.
Yates v. Currie - 1993 NSCA 116 - 1993-06-17
Court of Appeal - DecisionTRUCKING ) Hugh R. McLeod ) for the Appellant Appellant ) ) - and - )
-
20.
Harriss v. Keating Construction Company - 2014 NSSC 106 - 2014-03-21
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, for the Defendants By the Court: [1] Introduction: On March 6, 2014, I rendered a written decision in this matter.
-
21.
Westcott v. Dumont - 2009 NSSC 102 - 2009-03-30
Supreme Court - DecisionMr. Hugh McLeod, Counsel for Marilyn Westcott Introduction [1] We adjourned until today’s date for the decision on costs and for direction
-
22.
MacDonald v. MacVicar Estate - 2019 NSSC 108 - 2019-03-12
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh McLeod, for the Plaintiff, Kim MacDonald Lisa Richards, for the Respondent, Estate [...] [26] In his supplementary brief, Mr. McLeod states at paragraph 3, page 2: [...] The question is was it reasonable for Mr. McLeod to call these witnesses.
-
23.
MacKinnon v. Bonnar - 2006 NSSC 55 - 2006-02-22
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for the plaintiff Tony Mozvik, for the defendant
-
24.
Kelly v. Dillon - 1995 NSCA 7 - 1995-10-26
Court of Appeal - Decision) - and - ) Hugh R. McLeod ) for the respondent ) GLENDA MARIE DILLON )
-
25.
Baird v. Barkhouse - 2014 NSSC 74 - 2014-02-24
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, for the Plaintiff/Respondent Guy LaFosse, Q.C., for the Defendant/Applicant