56 result(s)
-
1.
Chisholm v. Chisholm - 2022 NSSC 270 - 2022-01-28
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh McLeod for Nancy (Chisholm) Donovan By the Court: Introduction [...] I was basically called a liar by Hugh. I proved it to you that she does not pay her bills on time, that there was disconnected notice and she hooked it up in December and this all happened in March and they’re asking me to rely, you’re asking me why I don’t want my sister to be there, my sister can’t be trusted.
-
2.
MacVicar Estate v. MacDonald - 2019 NSCA 90 - 2019-11-20
Court of Appeal - DecisionDuncan MacEachern and Hugh McLeod, for the respondent Reasons for judgment (Saunders and Farrar, JJ.A.):
-
3.
MacDonald v. MacVicar Estate - 2019 NSSC 108 - 2019-03-12
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh McLeod, for the Plaintiff, Kim MacDonald Lisa Richards, for the Respondent, Estate [...] [26] In his supplementary brief, Mr. McLeod states at paragraph 3, page 2: [...] The question is was it reasonable for Mr. McLeod to call these witnesses.
-
4.
Hussey v. Hussey Estate - 2018 NSSC 329 - 2018-12-05
Supreme Court - DecisionInstead, she later had her Will completed in consultation with solicitor, Hugh R. McLeod. [...] 11. THAT I realize this is an unequal division which has troubled me for many years and as a result of this I have had the occasion to seek the advice of two lawyers but have decided to take the advice of Hugh R. McLeod and that is to do what I want and to my own self be true.
-
5.
MacDonald v. MacVicar - 2018 NSSC 272 - 2018-09-20
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh McLeod, for the Plaintiff, Kim MacDonald Lisa Richards, for the Respondent, Ralph MacVicar
-
6.
Chapman v. Chapman - 2018 NSSC 212 - 2018-09-07
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh McLeod, Counsel for Malcolm Chapman Introduction [1] The Parties, Victoria Chapman, age 81, and Malcolm Chapman, age 80, were married on October 15, 2005.
-
7.
MacDonald v. MacVicar - 2018 NSSC 271 - 2018-09-07
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh McLeod, for the Plaintiff, Kim MacDonald Lisa Richards, for the Respondent, Ralph MacVicar
-
8.
MacLeod v. MacLeod - 2017 NSSC 237 - 2017-09-07
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh McLeod for the Applicant Nicole Campbell for the Respondent By the Court:
-
9.
Keating Construction Company v. Ross - 2015 NSSC 173 - 2015-06-15
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, for the Applicant Ian Parker, for the Respondents By the Court:
-
10.
Harriss v. Keating Construction Company - 2014 NSSC 135 - 2014-04-10
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, for the Defendants By the Court: [1] I rendered a Decision in this matter on March 6, 2014 followed by a Supplementary Decision on March 21, 2014.
-
11.
Harriss v. Keating Construction Company - 2014 NSSC 106 - 2014-03-21
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, for the Defendants By the Court: [1] Introduction: On March 6, 2014, I rendered a written decision in this matter.
-
12.
Harriss v. Keating Construction Company - 2014 NSSC 84 - 2014-03-06
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, for the Defendants CONTENTS Paragraphs I Chronology and Background
-
13.
Baird v. Barkhouse - 2014 NSSC 74 - 2014-02-24
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, for the Plaintiff/Respondent Guy LaFosse, Q.C., for the Defendant/Applicant
-
14.
Baird v. Barkhouse - 2013 NSSC 425 - 2013-12-23
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for the plaintiff/respondent Guy LaFosse, Q.C., for the defendant/applicant
-
15.
Morrison v. Morrison Estate - 2012 NSSC 451 - 2012-12-31
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, Counsel for Kenneth Morrison By the Court: [1] This is a Decision on Costs in relation to my ruling on August 30, 2012. [...] [25] The primary issue in the Application was whether the actions of the Executor, in not accepting an undertaking from Kenneth Morrison’s solicitor, Mr. McLeod, to pay the Estate expenses, was unreasonable.
-
16.
Harris v. Keating Construction Company Ltd. - 2012 NSSC 425 - 2012-11-21
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod, Counsel for the Defendants By the Court: [1] The following is my decision in regard to the Defendants' motion for disclosure of documents pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 15.02. [...] In support of the Motion, the Defendants' Solicitor, Hugh R. McLeod, filed an Affidavit, containing letters by the Plaintiffs' counsel to the Defendants' counsel. [...] The letters outline Mr. McLeod's request for the documentation, but provide little else in terms of evidence to support the Motion.
-
17.
Baird v. Barkhouse - 2012 NSSC 339 - 2012-09-26
Supreme Court - DecisionReceived from Mr. McLeod on September 5, 2012 Written Decision: September 26, 2012 [...] Counsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for the Plaintiff Guy LaFosse, Q.C., for the Defendant
-
18.
Baird v. Barkhouse - 2012 NSSC 289 - 2012-07-30
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for the Plaintiff Guy LaFosse, Q.C.,Jonathan Patterson (articled clerk) for the Defendant
-
19.
White v. MacDonald - 2011 NSSC 323 - 2011-08-19
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh R. McLeod for the Respondents By the Court: INTRODUCTION: [1] This is an appeal made pursuant to Section 32 of the Small Claims Court Act, RSNS 1989, c. 430.
-
20.
Beaton v. MacNeil - 2011 NSSC 302 - 2011-07-28
Supreme Court - DecisionHugh McLeod, Counsel for the Respondent By the Court: [1] Marlene Beaton, the mother, applies for custody, prospective and retroactive child maintenance, spousal support, a declaration of ownership of property and a division of property based on unjust enrichment.
-
21.
Fitzgerald v. Royal Sun Alliance Insurance Company - 2011 NSSC 132 - 2011-03-31
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Hugh McLeod, for the plaintiff Kevin Quigley, for the defendant [...] On that date, Royal received a letter from Hugh McLeod, Counsel for the Plaintiff, addressed to Bluenose Insurance wherein Mr. McLeod advised that Fitzgerald had been injured on February 21, 2010 and wanted to open up a "Section B and Section D claim." [...] In fact, Fitzgerald did not report the Incident to Royal, in writing or otherwise, until April 13, 2010 when Fitzgerald's Counsel, Hugh McLeod, wrote to Bluenose Insurance and advised that Fitzgerald had been injured on February 21, 2010 and wanted to open up a "Section B and Section D claim."
-
22.
Nyiti v. Cape Breton University - 2009 NSCA 69 - 2009-06-17
Court of Appeal - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for the appellant Nancy F. Bareaux and Krista Smith, for the respondent
-
23.
Nyiti v. Cape Breton University - 2009 NSCA 54 - 2009-05-21
Court of Appeal - DecisionCounsel: Hugh R. McLeod, for the appellant Nancy F. Barteaux and Krista Smith, for the respondent
-
24.
Westcott v. Dumont - 2009 NSSC 102 - 2009-03-30
Supreme Court - DecisionMr. Hugh McLeod, Counsel for Marilyn Westcott Introduction [1] We adjourned until today’s date for the decision on costs and for direction
-
25.
Westcott v. Dumont - 2009 NSSC 22 - 2009-01-27
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Mr. Hugh R. McLeod, counsel for Ms. Westcott Ms. Candee McCarthy, counsel for Mr. Dumont