52 result(s)
-
26.
Fraser v. 3102602 NS Ltd. - 2020 NSSC 187 - 2020-06-30
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern, for the Plaintiff Roderick Jeffrie, Defendant By the Court: [...] Mr. Jeffrie provided no explanation for his failure to respond to Mr. MacEachern’s efforts to communicate with him. [...] He has ignored his obligation to make documentary disclosure which Mr. MacEachern has now waived.
-
27.
Nova Scotia (Community Services) v. J.R. - 2010 NSSC 222 - 2010-05-26
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern, Solicitor for the Respondent, J.R Editorial Notice
-
28.
R. v. Polley - 2013 NSCA 156 - 2013-12-19
Court of Appeal - DecisionThe Honourable Justice Duncan R. Beveridge Motion Heard: December 19, 2013, in Chambers [...] [34] MacEachern C.J. B.C. in R. v. Nguyen (1997), 119 C.C.C. (3d) 269, who after reviewing a number of authorities, wrote of the appropriate approach to the issue of bail pending appeal:
-
29.
R. v. Fraser - 2012 NSPC 55 - 2012-02-07
Provincial Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern, for the Defence Summary The defendant was charged with fishing in a closed, contaminated area.
-
30.
Ahmed v. Naseem - 2016 NSSC 74 - 2016-03-23
Supreme Court - DecisionSubmissions: September 30, 2015 and October 30, 2015 by Duncan H. MacEachern [...] Counsel: Duncan H. MacEachern for Mohammed Ahmed Diana M. Musgrave for Iram Naseem
-
31.
Chisholm v. Chisholm - 2022 NSSC 271 - 2022-05-19
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern for Nancy (Chisholm) Donovan By the Court: Introduction
-
32.
3102602 Nova Scotia Limited v. Fraser - 2021 NSCA 13 - 2021-01-29
Court of Appeal - DecisionDuncan H. MacEachern, for the respondent Decision: [1] The Appellant (“the Company”) and the Respondent (“Fraser”) were engaged in litigation in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia following the transfer of Fraser’s crab fishing license allocation to the use of the Company.
-
33.
MacDonald v. Earle - 2010 NSSC 151 - 2010-05-28
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan H. MacEachern, Esq. for the Reginato Defendants Andrew Earle and Shirley Earle - Self-Represented [...] When questioned by Mr. MacEachern, he testified that some of the $57,800.00 was for wood product removed from other properties.
-
34.
Fraser v. 3102602 Nova Scotia Ltd. - 2015 NSSC 207 - 2015-07-15
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern, for the Plaintiff Brian Awad, for the Defendant
-
35.
Elgebeily, Zaynluke v. Mezza - 2023 NSSC 399 - 2023-11-14
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern for Elgebeily Restaurant Ltd. and Zaynluke Restaurant Ltd.
-
36.
McIntyre v. McNeil Estate - 2010 NSSC 135 - 2010-04-01
Supreme Court - DecisionCounsel: Duncan H. MacEachern, counsel for the Plaintiffs Darlene MacRury, counsel for the Defendant Estate
-
37.
MacGillivary v. Ross - 2008 NSSC 339 - 2008-11-18
Supreme Court - DecisionMr. Duncan MacEachern, counsel for Mr. Ross By the Court: I INTRODUCTION
-
38.
MacVicar Estate v. MacDonald - 2019 NSCA 90 - 2019-11-20
Court of Appeal - DecisionDuncan MacEachern and Hugh McLeod, for the respondent Reasons for judgment (Saunders and Farrar, JJ.A.): [...] [256] In terms of the caselaw and what constitutes a total disability, I find that Rogers J. described the relevant inquiry in MacEachern v. Co-Operative Fire and Casualty Co, (1986), 75 N.S.R. (2d) 271, and affirmed at (1978), 79 NSR (2d) 127: [...] Mr. MacEachern appeared to concede that because Murray, J. had seen fit to reduce the damages he awarded for future loss of income by 15 percent for contingencies, there was no logical reason why the same 15 percent reduction would not also apply to the damages he awarded for pension loss, since that award was directly
-
39.
R. v. McCormick - 2012 NSCA 58 - 2012-05-31
Court of Appeal - DecisionJudge: The Honourable Justice Duncan R. Beveridge Application Heard: May 24, 2012, in Halifax, Nova Scotia, In Chambers [...] [35] MacEachern C.J.B.C. in R. v. Nguyen (1997), 119 C.C.C. (3d) 269 reviewed a number of authorities and concluded:
-
40.
R. v. Janes - 2011 NSCA 10 - 2011-01-17
Court of Appeal - DecisionJudge: The Honourable Justice Duncan R. Beveridge Motion Heard: January 13 &17, 2011, in Halifax, Nova Scotia [...] [30] Chief Justice MacEachern in R. v. Nugyen (1997) 119 C.C.C. (3d) 269 reviewed a number of authorities and concluded:
-
41.
Batdorf v. MacLean - 2010 NSSC 462 - 2010-12-21
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan H. MacEachern, for the defendants By the Court: I. INTRODUCTION
-
42.
Warner v. O'Leary - 2014 NSSC 159 - 2014-05-02
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern, for the Applicant Alisha Brown-Fagan, for the Respondent
-
43.
White v. Stevens-White - 2013 NSSC 368 - 2013-11-07
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern, for the Respondent By the Court: [1] Introduction
-
44.
Chiasson v. Chiasson - 2006 NSSC 139 - 2006-05-08
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern, for the Respondent By the Court: [1] Lise Chiasson commenced divorce proceedings on November 30, 2004.She sought custody, access, child support, spousal support and a division of property, in accordance with the Separation Agreement entered into between herself and the Respondent, Jamie Chiasson, dated
-
45.
R. v. W.F. - 2023 NSSC 278 - 2021-08-17
Supreme Court - Decision[18] Duncan J (as he then was) took note of Dwernychuk in R. v. Wiles, 2009 NSSC 17, where the accused was charged with an over-80 and impaired driving causing bodily harm. [...] Justice Duncan advised counsel that in his view this objection was answered by R. v. Rilling, [1976] 2 SCR 183, by which the certificate would be admissible regardless of the lack of reasonable and probable grounds. [...] After hearing further submissions – in which, inter alia, the Crown waived its right to notice, and the parties agreed that no further evidence would be required on the Charter issue – Duncan J concluded that “[n]otwithstanding the restrictive philosophy expressed in R. v. Dwernychuk ...
-
46.
Bidart Estate v. Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Company - 2018 NSCA 52 - 2018-06-15
Court of Appeal - DecisionDuncan H. MacEachern and Nicholas E. Burke, for the appellant Stephanie Myles, for the respondent
-
47.
R. v. L.K.M. - 2024 NSSC 189 - 2024-06-28
Supreme Court - Decision[para. 52] The ‘Duncan’ credit is not a deduction from the otherwise appropriate sentence but is one of the factors to be taken into account in determining the appropriate sentence. [...] Respectfully, the Crown’s position is that potential Duncan credit would be limited to only these 32 [sic] days;[12] [...] ” per MacEachern, C.J.B.C. in R. v. Mafi (2000), 2000 BCCA 135 (CanLII), 142 C.C.C. (3d) 449 (C.A.)).
-
48.
Landry v. Chisholm - 2022 NSSC 207 - 2022-07-19
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern and Nicholas Burke, for the Plaintiff Ian Parker and Michelle Lahey, for the Defendant
-
49.
Bain v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General) - 2012 NSSC 355 - 2012-10-10
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan MacEachern, Counsel of Record for the Attorney General (without appearing) [...] In it were two (2) letters from Leslie A. Bain, one to Duncan MacKay of the Sydney Presbytery Committee, and the second to the surveyor, L.M. Harvey.
-
50.
Bidart Estate v. Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Company - 2017 NSSC 126 - 2017-05-15
Supreme Court - DecisionDuncan H. MacEachern and Nicholas E. Burke, for the Plaintiff Stephanie Myles and Ian Parker, for the Defendant