AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves Julieanna Seibert as the Plaintiff-Appellee and Margaret Segura as the Defendant-Appellant. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• Court of Appeals, March 28, 2016: Held the matter in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's disposition in Padilla v. Torres (para 1).

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant (Margaret Segura): Represented herself pro se. The specific arguments she made are not detailed in the provided text.
• Appellee (Julieanna Seibert): Represented by Michael W. Kelly. The specific arguments made by the appellee are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the issues presented in this matter are addressed by the Court’s opinion in Padilla v. Torres (para 3).

Disposition

• The district court's decision is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the metropolitan court for a new trial in accordance with Padilla (paras 6-7).

Reasons

• Per Curiam: The Supreme Court of New Mexico decided to withdraw its March 28, 2016, order that held the matter in abeyance, influenced by its decision in Padilla v. Torres. The Court concluded that the issues presented in the current matter were addressed by the opinion in Padilla, leading to the reversal of the district court's decision and remand for a new trial in accordance with the principles established in Padilla (paras 1-7). The decision was concurred by Chief Justice David K. Thomson, Justices Michael E. Vigil, C. Shannon Bacon, Julie J. Vargas, and Briana H. Zamora.