AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The Defendant was convicted of three counts of aggravated assault upon a peace officer with a deadly weapon, assault with intent to commit a violent felony (robbery), aggravated fleeing from law enforcement, shooting at or from a motor vehicle, and conspiracy to commit a felony.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Sandoval County, George P. Eichwald, District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellant: The Defendant argued that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions (para 2).
  • Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Defendant's convictions.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the Defendant's convictions (para 3).

Reasons

  • Per Roderick T. Kennedy, J. (James J. Wechsler, J., M. Monica Zamora, J., concurring): The Court considered the Defendant's memorandum in opposition but found no new evidence, facts, arguments, or issues beyond those addressed in its notice of proposed disposition. The Court reiterated that it does not re-weigh evidence or substitute its judgment for that of the jury. The jury's role is to resolve conflicts in evidence and determine the weight and credibility of the evidence and testimony. Based on these principles, the Court affirmed the Defendant's convictions (paras 2-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.