AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the Defendant's appeal from the revocation of his probation. Specific events leading to the probation revocation are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Curry County: Probation of the Defendant was revoked.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant: The Defendant opposed the proposed summary disposition of affirming the probation revocation, although specific arguments are not detailed in the provided text (N/A).
• Appellee: The State, presumably, argued in favor of affirming the probation revocation, though specific arguments are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the Defendant has shown error in the proposed summary disposition affirming the revocation of his probation.

Disposition

• The appeal from the revocation of the Defendant's probation was affirmed (para 3).

Reasons

• Per Ives, J. (Attrep, J., and Yohalem, J., concurring):
  The Court decided to affirm the district court's ruling on the Defendant's probation revocation. The Defendant's memorandum in opposition to the Court's notice of proposed disposition did not present any persuasive facts, authority, or argument to demonstrate error in the proposed summary disposition. The Court referenced previous case law stating the burden is on the party opposing the proposed disposition to clearly point out errors in fact or law, and merely repeating earlier arguments does not fulfill this requirement (paras 1-3).