AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Plaintiff appealed against the district court's decision, which granted summary judgment in favor of the Defendant, thereby dismissing the Plaintiff's claims. The specifics of the claims and the events leading to the lawsuit are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Bernalillo County: Summary judgment granted in favor of the Defendant, dismissing the Plaintiff's claims.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant: The Plaintiff did not provide new information in opposition to the proposed disposition of the case, effectively not contesting the summary affirmance proposed by the court (para 1).
• Defendant-Appellee: The Defendant agreed with the court's proposed affirmance of the district court's decision granting summary judgment and dismissing the Plaintiff's claims (para 1).

Legal Issues

• (N/A)

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order granting summary judgment and dismissing the Plaintiff's claims (para 2).

Reasons

• KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge, with JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge, and MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge, concurring: The Court of Appeals decided to affirm the district court's decision based on the Plaintiff's failure to provide new information or clearly point out errors in fact or law in opposition to the court's proposed disposition. The court referenced previous cases to support the principle that the burden is on the party opposing the proposed disposition to identify errors when a case is decided on the summary calendar. The Plaintiff's failure to respond to the proposed disposition of the issue was deemed an abandonment of the issue, leading to the affirmation of the district court's decision (paras 1-2).