AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves an appeal by the Plaintiff against a district court order that granted the Defendant's motion for summary judgment. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Bernalillo County, Beatrice J. Brickhouse, District Judge: Granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant: The Plaintiff's arguments or submissions in opposition to the Defendant's motion for summary judgment are not specified in the provided text.
• Defendant-Appellee: Filed a memorandum in support of the district court's decision to grant the motion for summary judgment (para 1).

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment should be affirmed.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (para 2).

Reasons

• Jonathan B. Sutin, Judge (Linda M. Vanzi, Judge, and J. Miles Hanisee, Judge, concurring): The Court decided to affirm the district court's decision based on the Plaintiff's failure to file a memorandum in opposition to the Defendant's motion for summary judgment, following the issuance of a calendar notice proposing to affirm the district court's order. The Court referenced Rule 12-210(D)(3) NMRA, which implies that failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the proposed disposition, citing Frick v. Veazey as precedent (para 1).